Particle polarization

Another hmitation to be considered is the volume that the DEP force can affec t. This factor can be controlled by the design of electrodes. As an example, consider elec trodes of cylindrical geometry. A practical example of this would be a cylinder with a wire running down the middle to provide the two electrodes. The field in such a system is proportional to 1/r. The DEP force is then Fdep VlE I =< 1/r, so that any differences in particle polarization might well be masked merely by positional differences in the force. At the outer cyhnder the DEP force may even be too small to affect the particles appreciably. The most desirable electrode shape is one in which the force is independent of position within the nonuniform field. This fisomotive electrode system is shown in Fig. 22-33. 

The major difference between both techniques concerns the use of constant single particle energies in Eq. (49). Therefore, the contributions of single particle polarization is included in the higher terms. We will use this method in Section V/A2 for bigger clusters. 

In the case of the polarization insertions the calculations may be simplified by simultaneous consideration of the insertions of both the electron and muon polarization loops [18, 19]. In such an approach one explicitly takes into account internal symmetry of the problem at hand with respect to both particles. So, let us preserve the factor 1/(1 - - m/M) in (9.9), even in calculation of the nonrecoil polarization operator contribution. Then we will obtain an extra factor m /m on the right hand side in (9.12). To facilitate further recoil calculations we could simply declare that the polarization operator contribution with this extra factor m /m is the result of the nonrecoil calculation but there exists a better choice. Insertion in the external photon lines of the polarization loop of a heavy particle with mass M generates correction to HFS suppressed by an extra recoil factor m/M in comparison with the electron loop contribution. Corrections induced by such heavy particles polarization loop insertions clearly should be discussed together with other radiative-recoil... 

The contribution of the muon polarization operator was already considered above. One might expect that contributions of the diagrams in Fig. 10.8 with the heavy particle polarization loops are of the same order of magnitude as the contribution of the muon loop, so it is natural to consider this contribution here. Respective corrections could easily be calculated by substituting the expressions for the heavy particle polarizations in the unsubtracted skeleton integral in (10.3). The contribution of the heavy lepton t polarization operator was obtained in [37, 38] both numerically and analytically... 

Muon and heavy particle polarization contributions to h3rperfine splitting in muonium were considered in Subsubsect. 9.3.1.2 and Subsect. 10.2.7. 

Electro- and magnetooptical phenomena in colloids and suspensions are widely used for structure and kinetics analysis of those media as well as practical applications in optoelectronics [143,144]. The basic theoretical model used to study optical anisotropy of the disperse systems is the noninteracting Brownian particle ensemble. In the frame of this general approximation, several special cases according to the actual type of particle polarization response to the applied field may be distinguished (1) particles with permanent dipole moments, (2) linearly polarizable particles, (3) nonlinearly polarizable particles, and (4) particles with hysteretic dipole moment reorientation. 

Coefficients for the polarization created on a single small particle a by an electric field of magnitude E. (The coefficient a is sometimes broken into a contribution that is due to the field orientation of permanent dipoles /xaipoie and a contribution that is due to the field s induction of a transient dipole on a polarizable particle.) Polarization = amks-Emks or cgs cgs in either unit system. Similarly fi or /3mps or Pegs for single small particle b. 

It is again a special chemical surface design of polymer latex particles which is delineated in the contribution by A. Elaissari. Here, special routes have been developed to modify both the particle polarity, the surface charge and its chemical functionality to reveal specific binding with DNA and peptides. Obviously, such species are highly relevant for particle-based diagnostic and particle-based cell separation. 

From measured CVP s and ESA s (sec. 4.5c) the -potential and/or other electroklnetlc characteristics must be derived, but the theoiy Is not simple. One of the reasons Is that fields and particle polarization are not necessarily In phase so that mobilities, conductivities, etc. become complex quantities. Electroklnetlc potentials enter because the inertia difference between the particles and the liquid in which they are embedded leads to shear. In the theories the usual assumption is made that there Is a slip plane of which the potential is... 

Information about this sum of the dipolar and non-dipolar associations is given e.g. by measurements of vapour pressure and viscosity, as they are functions of the free elementary particles Polarization experiments giving the electric moment per unit volume can only give us information about the dipolar association, as the non-dipolar association merely gives experimental effects of the second order. 

Figure 8.2 Interactions between particles polarized by an electric field. Particles whose separation is perpendicular to the field repel each other, while those whose separation is parallel to the field attract. (From Halsey and Martin 1993, Copyright Jared Schneidman Design, used with permission.)...

There do exist recent quantum chemical techniques which are size consistent. Among them, the Random Phase Approximation (RPA), its variants such as the Second-Order Polarization Propagator Approximation (SOPPA) [10], and the Coupled Cluster Approximation (CCA) [11] axe the most prominent and being widely used. In the SOPPA method, electron correlation effects are included in the two-particle polarization propagator to second order. The coupled cluster method uses an exponential ansatz through which higher-order exci-... 

Several factors contribute to the field-induced structural anisotropy that leads to optical anisotropy and hence to birefringence. All involve the particles polarization by the field and the partial alignment of their resultant dipole moments parallel to E. The resultant dipole moment / of a particle is the vector sum of its permanent and induced dipole moments. At the molecular level, electronic and atomic polarization occurs, the extent of which depends on the nature and symmetry of the molecule and on its polarizabilities (a and ax) along the parallel and perpendicular directions relative to the electric field or, for cylindrical symmetry, along the molecular axes a and b (a and a ). Naturally, the concept of the polarizability tensor is applicable to an assembly of molecules as a whole, e.g., a colloidal particle, as well. For such systems, and also for macromolecules and polyelectrolytes in an insulating medium, interfacial polarization may also have a major or even dominant contribution to the resultant dipole moment. 

Dielectrophoresis (DEP) is the motion observed of a dielectric particle polarized in a nonuniform... 

Dielectrophoresis, Fig. 2 Schcanatic diagram of how different dielectric particles polarize if they have a much highra- (a) or much lower (b) polarizability than the suspending fluid medium. If the polarizability is higher, more charges are produced on the inside of the particle/ fluid interface and there is a net dipole araoss the particle that is parallel to the applied field. If the polarizability is lower, mme charges are produced on the outside of the interface and the net dipole points in the opposite direction, against the field... 

Electro-orientation involves the alignment of a nonspherical particle in a uniform electric field (Fig. 4b). When an ellipsoidal particle polarizes, the dipole moment will align the particle parallel with the electric field. Typically this alignment occurs with the nonspherical particle s... 

CEN EN 1430. 2009. Bitumen and bituminous binders — Determination of particle polarity of bituminous emulsions. Brussels CEN. 

This test is performed in order to determine the bitumen particle polarity of the bitumen emulsion and, hence, the type of emulsion (cationic or anionic). 

---