D Orbital calculation

Figure 34. Gations, dihedral angles, and symmetry of the tetrachlorocuprates complexes at ambient pressure. The d orbital calculated structures (A-D) reported in the lower section correspond to the different geometries of the CuCl complex.

Fig. 16. Ground-state parameters gf (A) and rhombic splitting 6 (B) for a % ground state as a function of the axial (A) and rhombic (v) splitting of the fjg set of d orbitals, calculated from a ligand field Hamiltonian with X = -80 cm .

For Iran sition metals th c splittin g of th c d orbitals in a ligand field is most readily done using HHT. In all other sem i-ctn pirical meth -ods, the orbital energies depend on the electron occupation. HyperCh em s m oiccii lar orbital calcii latiori s give orbital cri ergy spacings that differ from simple crystal field theory prediction s. The total molecular wavcfunction is an antisymmetrized product of the occupied molecular orbitals. The virtual set of orbitals arc the residue of SCT calculations, in that they are deemed least suitable to describe the molecular wavefunction, ... 

I nple J A and D L Beveridge, 1970. Approximate Molecular Orbital Theory. New York, McGraw-Hill. Riduirds W G and D L Cooper 1983. Ab initio Molecular Orbital Calculations for Qieniists. 2nd Edition. Oxford, Clarendon Press. 

A very important difference between H2 and molecular orbital calculations is electron correlation. Election correlation is the term used to describe interactions between elections in the same molecule. In the hydrogen molecule ion, there is only one election, so there can be no election correlation. The designators given to the calculations in Table 10-1 indicate first an electron correlation method and second a basis set, for example, MP2/6-31 G(d,p) designates a Moeller-Plesset electron coiTclation extension beyond the Hartiee-Fock limit canied out with a 6-31G(d,p) basis set. 

Practically all CNDO calculations are actually performed using the CNDO/ 2 method, which is an improved parameterization over the original CNDO/1 method. There is a CNDO/S method that is parameterized to reproduce electronic spectra. The CNDO/S method does yield improved prediction of excitation energies, but at the expense of the poorer prediction of molecular geometry. There have also been extensions of the CNDO/2 method to include elements with occupied d orbitals. These techniques have not seen widespread use due to the limited accuracy of results. 

You can use multiple basis sets in a single molecular system. The Apply Basis Set in HyperChem applies the currently selected basis set to the selected atoms or to all the atoms in HyperChem if there is no current selection. For example, some heavy atoms might have a 6-3IG basis set (s and p only) while other heavy atoms might use a 6-3IG basis set (with d-orbitals). This is an unusual but flexible option for ab initio calculations. 

There are two different sets of d-type functions (d orbitals) used in ab initio calculations. One 3d set consists of five 3d functions —... 

The Extended Hiickel method also allows the inclusion of d orbitals for third row elements (specifically. Si, P, S and Cl) in the basis set. Since there are more atomic orbitals, choosing this option results in a longer calculation. The major reason to include d orbitals is to improve the description of the molecular system. 

Normally, you would expects all 2p orbitals in a given first row atom to be identical, regardless of their occupancy. This is only true when you perform calculations using Extended Hiickel. The orbitals derived from SCE calculations depend sensitively on their occupation. Eor example, the 2px, 2py, and 2pz orbitals are not degenerate for a CNDO calculation of atomic oxygen. This is especially important when you look at d orbital splittings in transition metals. To see a clear delineation between t2u and eg levels you must use EHT, rather than other semiempirical methods. 

Recently Thiel and Voityuk have constructed a workable NDDO model which also includes d-orbitals for use in connection with MNDO, called MNDO/d. With reference to the above description for MNDO/AM1/PM3, it is clear that there are immediately three new parameters Cd, Ud and (dd (eqs. (3.82) and (3.83)). Of the 12 new one-centre two-electron integrals only one (Gjd) is taken as a freely varied parameter. The other 11 are calculated analytically based on pseudo-orbital exponents, which are assigned so that the analytical formulas regenerate Gss, Gpp and Gdd. 

The details of the functional form and parameterization have not yet been published. The advantage is that basis sets involving d-orbitals are readily included (defining the SAMID method), making it possible to perform calculations on a larger fraction of the periodic table. The SAMI method explicitly uses the minimum STO-3G basis set, but it is in principle also possible to use extended basis sets with this model. The acmal calculation of the integrals makes the SAMI method somewhat slower than the MNDO/ AM1/PM3, but only by a factor of 2. The SAMI/SAMID methods have been parameterized for the elements H, Li, C, N, O, F, Si, P, S, Cl, Fe, Cu, Br and 1. 

Recently H. L. Jones and D. L. Beveridge have presented molecular orbital calculations on the electronic structure of 2,3-pyrid5me explaining the exclusive formation of 2-aminopyridine from this intermediate [Tetrahedron Letters No. 24, 1577 (1964)]. 

Three LMTO envelopes were used with the tail energies -0.01 Ry, -1 Ry and -2.3 Ry. In the first two of them, s,p,d orbitals were included and in the last one only. s and p were used. It was necessary to treat the Ti 3p and 3-s states in the semi-core state, i.e. to do a so called 2-panel calculation. The basis set for the second panel consisted of 3-s, 3p, 3d orbitals on the Ti sites and 3-s, 3p orbitals on the Si sites. The same quality k-mesh was used in all calculations to ensure maximum cancellation of numerical errors and to obtain accurate energy differences. 

Meanwhile orbitals cannot be observed either directly, indirectly since they have no physical reality contrary to the recent claims in Nature magazine and other journals to the effect that some d orbitals in copper oxide had been directly imaged (Scerri, 2000). Orbitals as used in ab initio calculations are mathematical figments that exist, if anything, in a multi-dimensional Hilbert space.19 Electron density is altogether different since it is a well-defined observable and exists in real three-dimensional space, a feature which some theorists point to as a virtue of density functional methods. 

Parr, R. G., Craig, D. P., and Ross, I. G., J. Chem. Phys. 18, 1561, Molecular orbital calculations of the lower excited electronic levels of benzene, configuration interaction included." One of the most complete nonempirical calculations concerning n electrons. 

Calculations for trigonal bipyramidal ML4(NO) systems with axial NO-like [Ir(NO)(PPh3)3H+] give a d orbital sequence of xz,yz < x2 — y2, xy < z2 so that in such an IrNO 8 system, the z2 orbital is unoccupied not only does bending not produce any stabilization but in fact dxz, dyz — 7r back-bonding is lost, favouring a linear Ir—N—O bond. 

Molecular orbital calculations for transition metal compounds. D. R. Davies and G. A. Webb, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1971, 6, 95-146 (267). 

Table 9 shows the PP MO results for this interesting series of highly strained three-membered cyclic molecules. Here a detailed comparison is possible with the best results of an all-electron study, including d functions10 (also reported in Table 9). An analysis of this table reveals how all trends in population analysis, both in charges and overlap populations, are the same in the AE + d and in the simple PP calculations, with very few and very minor exceptions. PP predicts a charge donation to the aliphatic groups, while AE predicts a withdrawal, mainly due to the availability of d orbitals on sulphur, which can allocate extra electronic charge. As outlined in the general notes on population analysis (Section III.D) comparisons should be carried out on a relative basis and,...

All other results are consistent with the picture of d orbitals as electron acceptors that strengthen the S—O bond. S—O BOPs are larger, and C—S ones are smaller, in the calculations with d orbitals C—C BOPs show a decrease as the number of oxygen atoms... 

Clearly, there exists a good agreement between theoretical predictions (and calculations) based on the participation of sulfur 3d-orbitals and available experimental results. Thus, the important role of the sulfur d-orbitals in determining the structure and, consequently, the chemistry of sulfones and sulfoxides in general, and of strained smallring sulfones and sulfoxides in particular, has been established. 

---