Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Parameter analysis kinetic parameters, significance

If the unbound drug concentrations in plasma are higher than their K values on the transporters, then transporter function may be significantly affected [106], Following a pharmacokinetic analysis of the effect of probenecid on the hepatobiliary excretion of methotrexate, it has been shown the extent of an in vivo drug-drug interaction can be quantitatively predicted from the kinetic parameters for transport across the sinusoidal and bile canalicular membranes determined in vitro [107]. [Pg.299]

The method of lines and system identification are not restricted in their applicability. System identification is preferred because the order of the resulting state space model is significantly lower. Another advantage of system Identification is that it can directly be applied on experimental data without complicated analysis to determine the kinetic parameters. Furthermore, no model assumptions are required with respect to the form of the kinetic expressions, attrition, agglomeration, the occurence of growth rate dispersion, etc. [Pg.157]

Figure 8 shows a pair of typical time-resolved fluorescence decay traces for 100 / M pyrene in supercritical CO2 (Tr = 1.02 pr = 1.17). Note that the ordinate is logarithmic. The upper and lower panels show results for selective observation in the monomer (400 +. 10 nm) and excimer (460 + 10 nm) regions of the pyrene emission spectrum. Several interesting features are apparent from these traces. First, both decay processes are not single exponential. Second, the excimer emission has a significant contribution from a species that "grows in" between 30 - 75 ns this is a result of the excimer taking time to form (i.e., k in Figure 1). Third, the fits between the experimental data and the model shown in Figure 1 are good. Detailed analysis of these decay traces (10,11,21-26) yields the entire ensemble of photophysical kinetic parameters for the pyrene excimer in supercritical C02. Figure 8 shows a pair of typical time-resolved fluorescence decay traces for 100 / M pyrene in supercritical CO2 (Tr = 1.02 pr = 1.17). Note that the ordinate is logarithmic. The upper and lower panels show results for selective observation in the monomer (400 +. 10 nm) and excimer (460 + 10 nm) regions of the pyrene emission spectrum. Several interesting features are apparent from these traces. First, both decay processes are not single exponential. Second, the excimer emission has a significant contribution from a species that "grows in" between 30 - 75 ns this is a result of the excimer taking time to form (i.e., k in Figure 1). Third, the fits between the experimental data and the model shown in Figure 1 are good. Detailed analysis of these decay traces (10,11,21-26) yields the entire ensemble of photophysical kinetic parameters for the pyrene excimer in supercritical C02.
Numerous reports are available [19,229-248] on the development and analysis of the different procedures of estimating the reactivity ratio from the experimental data obtained over a wide range of conversions. These procedures employ different modifications of the integrated form of the copolymerization equation. For example, intersection [19,229,231,235], (KT) [236,240], (YBR) [235], and other [242] linear least-squares procedures have been developed for the treatment of initial polymer composition data. Naturally, the application of the non-linear procedures allows one to obtain more accurate estimates of the reactivity ratios. However, majority of the calculation procedures suffers from the fact that the measurement errors of the independent variable (the monomer feed composition) are not considered. This simplification can lead in certain cases to significant errors in the estimated kinetic parameters [239]. Special methods [238, 239, 241, 247] were developed to avoid these difficulties. One of them called error-in-variables method (EVM) [239, 241, 247] seems to be the best. EVM implies a statistical approach to the general problem of estimating parameters in mathematical models when the errors in all measured variables are taken into account. Though this method requires more information than do ordinary non-linear least-squares procedures, it provides more reliable estimates of rt and r2 as well as their confidence limits. [Pg.61]

Non-isothermal measurements (Chapter 2) have yielded valuable information about reaction temperatures and the successive steps in the removal of water from crystalline hydrates, e g. oxalates [14], sulfates [15-17]. DTA and DSC studies have sometimes provided additional information on the recrystallization of the dehydrated product [18]. The problems of relating kinetic parameters obtained by non-isothermal measurements to those from isothermal experiments are discussed in Chapter 5. The effects of heat transfer and diffusion of water vapour may be of even greater consequence in non-isothermal work. Rouquerol [19,20] has suggested that some of the above problems may be significantly decreased through the use of constant rate thermal analysis. [Pg.220]

Lovera OM, Heizler MT, Harrison TM (1993) Argon diffusion domains in K-feldspar, II Kinetic parameters ofMH-10. Contrib Mineral Petrol 113 381-393 Lovera OM, Grove M, Harrison TM, Mahon KI (1997) Systematic analysis of K-feldspar "" Ar/ Ar step heating results I. Significance of activation energy determinations. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61 3171-3192... [Pg.814]

This work presents an analysis of kinetic parameters, used in a dynamic structured model for the acrylic acid production process. Through this procedure, it was possible to identify the parameters with the most significant impact on the model to represent well the process of acrylic acid production. [Pg.678]

On a practical level, the heuristic approach includes first collecting all the possible data during the experiments as a function of the parameters which are deemed to be important, i.e. concentrations, temperature, pressures, pH, catalyst concentration, volume, etc. Then the rate constants are estimated by regression analysis and the adequacy of the model is judged based on some criteria (like residual sums and parameter significance, which will be discussed further). If a researcher is not satisfied, then additional experiments are performed, followed by parameter estimation and sometimes simulations outside the studied parameter domain. The latter procedure provides the possibility to test the predictive power of a kinetic model. The kinetic model is then gradually improved and the experimental plan is modified, if needed. This process continues until the researcher is satisfied with the kinetic model. [Pg.425]

X 10" s as described above, this eliminates the possibility of an infinite number of optimal parameter sets. The values of the kinetic parameters obtained from this analysis which simultaneously describe both the TPD of adsorbed C and the TPR of coadsorbed A and B in an optimal fashion are summarized in Table 2 the four parameters optimized through this process shown in italics. As was observed above for the TPD results of A and B, these parameters are significantly lower than the values used to generate the nonuniform surface data (see Table 1). [Pg.348]

Now we can really see why the CSTR operated at steady state is so different from the transient batch reactor. If the inlet feed flow rates and concentrations are fixed and set to be equal in sum to the outlet flow rate, then, because the volume of the reactor is constant, the concentrations at the exit are completely defined for fixed kinetic parameters. Or, in other words, if we need to evaluate kab and kd, we simply need to vary the flow rates and to collect the corresponding concentrations in order to fit the data to these equations to obtain their magnitudes. We do not need to do any integration in order to obtain the result. Significantly, we do not need to have fast analysis of the exit concentrations, even if the kinetics are very fast. We set up the reactor flows, let the system come to steady state, and then take as many measurements as we need of the steady-state concentration. Then we set up a new set of flows and repeat the process. We do this for as many points as necessary in order to obtain a statistically valid set of rate parameters. This is why the steady-state flow reactor is considered to be the best experimental reactor type to be used for gathering chemical kinetics. [Pg.390]

The effect of experimental conditions on the characteristics of the recorded data should be thoroughly investigated before any analysis is begun. Where the influence of experimental conditions is slight, reaction rate kinetic parameters can be estimated, but should not be assigned any physical significance and should only be used for comparison within a given set of samples. In all other... [Pg.89]

Intrinsic kinetic expressions based on an elementary mechanism have been proposed for modelling the data here presented. This kinetie model is coupled to the solution of mass conservation equation inside the active catalytic layer. Fifteen kinetic parameters arise from the model and nine of them could be satisfactorily fitted with the available experimental tests at 40°C. The most significant conclusions arising from the analysis of the results are ... [Pg.534]


See other pages where Parameter analysis kinetic parameters, significance is mentioned: [Pg.284]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.551]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.13]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.706 , Pg.707 ]




SEARCH



Analysis parameters

Kinetic analysis

Kinetic parameters

Kinetics parameters

Kinetics significance

Parameter significance

Significant parameters

© 2024 chempedia.info