Pair-interaction terms

The parameters l0, Kb, 0o, K , K,p, n, 8, ay, by, qit qy and r belong to the fit parameters, which can be determined by fitting of Equation 1.1 to a sufficient set of data calculated by QM and/or determined experimentally (e.g., X-ray scattering, IR spectroscopy, heats of formation). From a numeric point of view the pair interaction terms (van der Waals and Coulomb) are most demanding. In this connection the typical size of polymer packing models is limited to typically 3000-10000 atoms (leading to lateral sizes of bulk models of a few nm), although in other connections now also models with up to 100000 atoms have been used. 

The operator of biquadratic exchange involves not only the pair-interaction terms but also the triad-interaction ones... 

Pair Interaction Term (5(A, ) This final term is similar to the asymmetry term. In short, the nuclear spin of the particles has two possibilities spin-up or spin-down. Just like in the asymmetry term, there s a net benefit when all the spins are paired (the same number of spin-ups and spin-downs). The only way to have a perfect pairing of spin-up and spin-down is to have an even number of particles, so when Z and N are both even, you have more energy than when either Z or A is odd, which has more energy than when both Z and N are odd. 

The coulomb term involves the repulsion between the positively charged protons that weakens the attractions, so it is a negative term. The asymmetry and pair interaction terms, on the other hand, are a little more tricky. They hinge off of a basic assumption Your atom wants to have equal numbers of protons and neutrons, but most likely has an odd number of either Z or N. This translates into the asymmetry term is always zero unless Z doesn t equal N, in which case the asymmetry weakens the attractions causing the binding energy to go down. Similarly, the pair interaction term assumes a starting point of one term (either... 

In this version of theory, Muthukumar suggests the possibility of replacing the ternary contact term in Equation 3 by the effective pair interaction term... 

To conclude, compared to the exact theory of electrons and photons sketched in chapter 7 and in accordance with Eq. (3.252), we may consider approximate pair interaction terms of Coulomb-Breit type for incorporation into the first-quantized many-electron Hamiltonian in the following section 8.2. 

Similarly, the pair interaction terms can be decomposed following ... 

The latter equation includes a so-called nonbond term which is part of almost all force fields. It adds an explicit atom-atom pair interaction term (equation 2) for the interactions between atoms in a molecule which are separated by at least three or four bonds ... 

This situation, despite the fact that reliability is increasing, is very undesirable. A considerable effort will be needed to revise the shape of the potential functions such that transferability is greatly enhanced and the number of atom types can be reduced. After all, there is only one type of carbon it has mass 12 and charge 6 and that is all that matters. What is obviously most needed is to incorporate essential many-body interactions in a proper way. In all present non-polarisable force fields many-body interactions are incorporated in an average way into pair-additive terms. In general, errors in one term are compensated by parameter adjustments in other terms, and the resulting force field is only valid for a limited range of environments. 

Imagine a model hydrogen molecule with non-interacting electrons, such that their Coulomb repulsion is zero. Each electron in our model still has kinetic energy and is still attracted to both nuclei, but the electron motions are completely independent of each other because the electron-electron interaction term is zero. We would, therefore, expect that the electronic wavefunction for the pair of electrons would be a product of the wavefunctions for two independent electrons in H2+ (Figure 4.1), which I will write X(rO and F(r2). Thus X(ri) and T(r2) are molecular orbitals which describe independently the two electrons in our non-interacting electron model. 

One of the major ingredient for the understanding of alloy phase stability is the configurational energy. Models have been proposed to represent the configurational energies in terms of effective multisite interactions, in particular effective pair interactions (EPls). 

For simplicity we limit ourselves to the on-site terms and pair interactions only, although triplets, quadruplets, etc., can be studied along the same lines. 

The form of the functions may be closely similar to that of the molecular orbitals used in the simple theory of metals. If there are M interatomic positions in the crystal which might be occupied by any one of the N electron-pair bonds, then the M functions linear aggregates that approximate the solutions of the wave equation with inclusion of the interaction terms representing resonance. This combination can be effected with use of Bloch factors ... 

For large systems, the computation of the energy can require 98% or more of the total computational effort, and within the energy computation, the pair interaction energy (van der Waals and electrostatic terms) can represent more than 90% of the total effort. For this reason, the aspects of the program that deal with the generation of the nonbond list and the computation of the nonbond energy are of critical importance. 

The equations to be fulfilled by momentum space orbitals contain convolution integrals which give rise to momentum orbitals ( )(p-q) shifted in momentum space. The so-called form factor F and the interaction terms Wij defined in terms of current momentum coordinates are the momentum space counterparts of the core potentials and Coulomb and/or exchange operators in position space. The nuclear field potential transfers a momentum to electron i, while the interelectronic interaction produces a momentum transfer between each pair of electrons in turn. Nevertheless, the total momentum of the whole molecule remains invariant thanks to the contribution of the nuclear momenta [7]. 

Attempts have been made to put the VSEPR model on a quantitative basis by describing the interaction between electron pairs in terms of force law of the type... 

The first sum is over all pairs i, j of the set N2, and similar definitions apply to higher terms. The retention of higher order than pair interactions is essential for the problem at hand, but the... 

The statistical thermodynamic approach of Pitzer (14), involving specific interaction terms on the basis of the kinetic core effect, has provided coefficients which are a function of the ionic strength. The coefficients, as the stoichiometric association constants in our ion-pairing model, are obtained empirically in simple solutions and are then used to predict the activity coefficients in complex solutions. The Pitzer approach uses, however, a first term akin to the Debye-Huckel one to represent nonspecific effects at all concentrations. This weakens somewhat its theoretical foundation. 

---