Out-of-pocket expenses

Costs. There are two cost elements in doing marketing research studies professional charges and out-of-pocket expenses. The actual cost of any study is entirely dependent upon the number of interviews and the type of interviews. In practice, a 100-person interview study will cost 30,000 to 50,000. However, if a 50 x 10 investment is involved, the market study is cheap insurance. 

Book-Bas s Depreciation. The book-basis depreciation is arbitrarily determined by management on a year-to-year basis, subject to acceptable accounting practice. This is not an out-of-pocket expense. It is simply a charge for the recovery of capital ia earnings calculations and is available as capital for reinvestment or distribution. Some consistent treatment for recovery of capital must be assumed ia profitabiUty analysis. 

What is the out-of-pocket expense for a blender whose price is 89.95, plus a 6% sales tax ... 

The payment of reasonable honoraria and reimbursement of out of pocket expenses, including travel, for speakers, is permissible. 

Time and Materials. This is more of a consulting business model. The customer is being charged for the total time spent by the CRO on a particular project. Material used, travel expenses, and other out-of-pocket expenses are also billed to the client. 

The budget for the out-of-pocket expenses for promotion typically represents not more than 0.5% of sales. 

June 22 An agreement between President Obama and the pharmaceutical drug industry proposes to reduce the cost of prescription drugs for Medicare beneficiaries by partially covering the donut hole, or the out-of-pocket expenses paid when purchases cost more than 2,700 and less than 6,154. 

Consider next some issues of motivation. An individual s preference can be inconsistent in various ways that do not imply any kind of split self. It is possible to make a person prefer A over and C over D, even if A is essentially the same option as D, and the same as C. For instance, Mr H. mows his own lawn. His neighbor s son would mow it for 8. He wouldn t mow his neighbor s same-sized lawn for 20 (Thaler 1980). The proposed explanation for this phenomenon is that people value out-of-pocket expenses differently from opportunity cost, thus creating a normatively unjustifiable presumption in favour of the status quo. Although this particular example may yield to another explanation (Section IX), many other cases certainly fit this distinction. Thus, credit card customers may be less deterred by a cash discount to non-users than by a surcharge to users, even if the two are substantively the same (Thaler 1980). If in such cases it is possible to induce preference reversal, it is not because two parts of the person have different preferences. Rather it is because the person reacts to the way in which the options are presented, and not simply to their substantive content. 

Out-of-pocket expenses per trip across the field may be less for mechanical tillage than for herbicides, but soil moisture loss is greater with tillage. No-till fallow is more profitable than mechanical fallow only if no-till fallow makes better use of the improved water infiltration through crop rotations with shorter fallow periods. Peterson et al. (1996) compared water-use efficiency for entire fallow cropping rotations. Three-year rotations (two harvested crops in 3 years) had consistently higher water-use efficiencies across the central and southern Great Plains than 2-year rotations (one harvested crop in two years). 

Cost sharing affects the total cost of prescription drug benefifs in two ways It affects the amount paid for each prescription, and if also affecfs utilization. According to the law of demand in economics, as price increases, demand fends to decrease. In fhe case of drug prescriptions, price is the member s out-of-pocket expense. As cost-sharing (i.e., out-of-pocket expense) increases, utilization decreases. 

On small projects, procurement could either be assigned to the contractor doing the detailed engineering or performed by the Owner. In-house execution will undoubtedly minimize out-of-pocket expenses and seems like the desired option. However, the approach will only be viable for very small projects or on locations where an experienced and well-staffed purchasing department is available. 

Patients are not paid to take part in clinical trials, though out of pocket expenses are frequently met. 

Payment of reasonable fees and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, including travel and accommodation, may be provided to healthcare professionals who are providing genuine services as speakers or presenters on the basis of a written contract with the company at the event. 

Remuneration must be in the form of an honorarium (fair and reasonable). Travel, accommodation and out-of-pocket expenses in providing the consulting service, where warranted, may be reimbursed. 

Thaler (1980) argues (hat neglect of opportunity costs and excessive focus on out-of-pocket expenses is a frequent source of cognitive Irrationality. The neglect of the opportunity costs that are created by the fact that decision making takes time is also an important and pervasive source of irrationality... 

Direct nonmedical costs are any costs for nonmedical services that are results of illness or disease but do not involve purchasing medical services. These costs are consumed to purchase services other than medical care and include resources spent by patients for transportation to and from health care facihties, extra trips to the emergency department, child or family care expenses, special diets, and various other out-of-pocket expenses. 

Although use of nonprescription medications can be viewed as a reduction in the cost of prescription medications, cost shifting to out of pocket expense greatly affects patients on fixed incomes. Many... 

Most insurance plans (80 percent) have both an annual deductible and an annual maximum limit on out-of-pocket expenses (491). 

The purpose and type of analysis undertaken will determine the categories for which cost data will need to be collected. For example, hospital costs may involve identifying costs of services, facihties and overheads, while community costs may involve costs associated with visits to GPs, nurses or other health professionals. From a third party perspective one may want to consider actual charges rather than costs because often third parties do not cover total health care costs. As regards patients it is important to place a value both on their time and that of their family, as well as to take into account any out-of-pocket expenses incurred. In such matters, however, it can be important to assess the relative importance of a cost item to the overall outcome since the cost of including some minor costs may not be justified by their significance in the total picture. 

Also don t forget, benefits may also include 401 (k) plans, stock options, and a vacation/holiday package. These are big issues. If a company offers little to no coverage, it can be a bad sign—and possibly a signal to keep looking. Deduct your out-of-pocket expenses from the offered salary before making a decision. 

---