Orbital first-order

These interactions are second order in PAB, so they are weaker than those occurring between degenerate orbitals (first order in PAB). The more stabilized a, the easier is the reaction between A and B. To maximize this stabilization, the numerator PAB2 must be increased and/or the denominator (EA° — EB°) decreased. Since Mulliken s approximation (p. 13) takes PAB proportional to the overlap between VPA° and we can see that ... 

Mixing of Degenerate Orbitals—First-Order Perturbations... 

To arrive at the electronic configuration of an atom the appropriate number of electrons are placed in the orbitals in order of energy, the orbitals of lower energy being filled first (Aufbau principle ), subject to the proviso that for a set of equivalent orbitals - say the three p orbitals in a set - the electrons are placed one... 

You can order the molecular orbitals that arc a solution to etjtia-tion (47) accordin g to th eir en ergy, Klectron s popii late the orbitals, with the lowest energy orbitals first. normal, closed-shell, Restricted Hartree hock (RHK) description has a nia.xirnuin of Lw o electrons in each molecular orbital, one with electron spin up and one w ith electron spin down, as sliowm ... 

The zeroth-order Gaussian function has s-orbital angular symmetry the three first-order iTiiissian functions have p-orbital symmetry. In normalised form these are ... 

When the states P1 and P2 are described as linear combinations of CSFs as introduced earlier ( Fi = Zk CiKK), these matrix elements can be expressed in terms of CSF-based matrix elements < K I eri IOl >. The fact that the electric dipole operator is a one-electron operator, in combination with the SC rules, guarantees that only states for which the dominant determinants differ by at most a single spin-orbital (i.e., those which are "singly excited") can be connected via electric dipole transitions through first order (i.e., in a one-photon transition to which the < Fi Ii eri F2 > matrix elements pertain). It is for this reason that light with energy adequate to ionize or excite deep core electrons in atoms or molecules usually causes such ionization or excitation rather than double ionization or excitation of valence-level electrons the latter are two-electron events. 

If, as is eommon, the atomie orbital bases used to earry out the MCSCF energy optimization are not explieitly dependent on the external field, the third term also vanishes beeause (9xv/3)i)o = 0. Thus for the MCSCF ease, the first-order response is given as the average value of the perturbation over the wavefunetion with X=0 ... 

Note that in this case the spin-orbit coupling is included already in zero order. Including the first-order term from an expansion of K defines the Eirst-Order Regular Approximation (FORA) method. 

For comparison with the usual second-order perturbation in the spin-orbit coupling, we assume that the first order calculation has taken all first-order effects into account as in Eq.(l 1). The second-order perturbation due to the interaction operator W is given by... 

Furthermore, LandS s theory only represents a first-order approximation, and the L and S quantum numbers only behave as good quantum numbers when spin-orbit coupling is neglected. It is interesting to note that the most modem method for establishing the atomic ground state and its configuration is neither chemical nor spectroscopic in the usual sense of the word but makes use of atomic beam techniques (38). 

This theorem follows from the antisymmetry requirement (Eq. II.2) and is thus an expression for Pauli s exclusion principle. In the naive formulation of this principle, each spin orbital could be either empty or fully occupied by one electron which then would exclude any other electron from entering the same orbital. This simple model has been mathematically formulated in the Hartree-Fock scheme based on Eq. 11.38, where the form of the first-order density matrix p(x v xx) indicates that each one of the Hartree-Fock functions rplt y)2,. . ., pN is fully occupied by one electron. 

These rules follow directly from the quantum-mechanical theory of perturbations and the resolution of the secular equations for the orbital interaction problem. The (small) interaction between orbitals of significantly different energ is the familiar second order type interaction, where the interaction energy is small relative to the difference between EA and EB. The (large) interaction between orbitals of same energy is the familiar first order type interaction between degenerate or nearly degenerate levels. 

Consider again the electron-transfer reaction O + ne = R the actual electron transfer step involves transfer of the electron between the conduction band of the electrode and a molecular orbital of O or R (e.g., for a reduction, from the conduction band into an unoccupied orbital in O). The rate of the forward (reduction) reaction, Vf, is first order in O ... 

If the perturbation function shows cubic symmetry, and in certain other special cases, the first-order perturbation energy is not effective in destroying the orbital magnetic moment, for the eigenfunction px = = i py leads to the same first-order perturbation terms as pi or pv or any other combinations of them. In such cases the higher order perturbation energies are to be compared with the multiplet separation in the above criterion. 

The approach we have adopted for the d configuration began from the so-called strong-field limit. This is to be contrasted to the weak-field scheme that we describe in Section 3.7. In the strong-field approach, we consider the crystal-field splitting of the d orbitals first, and then recognize the effects of interelectron repulsion. The opposite order is adopted in the weak-field scheme. Before studying this alternative approach, however, we must review a little of the theory of free-ion spectroscopy... 

Within the first-order estimations made here, it is apparent that no change in d-d repulsion energy accompanies the hydration process. Second-order adjustments would, of course, take account of the change in mean i/-orbital radius on complex formation. Let us agree to stop at the simple level of correction here. Overall, therefore, the significant Coulombic change on hydration concerns the loss of exchange stabilization. 

Here Uj and Uj are Cartesian unit vectors, a) and j3) are localized orbitals that are doubly occupied in the HF ground state, jm) and n) are virtual orbitals. Rq is the position vector of the local gauge origin assigned to orbital a) and = (r — R ) x p is the angular momentum relative to Re- Superscript 1 denotes terms to first order in the fluctuation potential, and = [A — is the principal propagator at the zero energy... 

An appealing way to apply the constraint expressed in Eq. (3.14) is to make connection with Natural Orbitals (31), in particular, to express p as a functional of the occupation numbers, n, and Natural General Spin Ckbitals (NGSO s), yr,, of the First Order Reduced Density Operator (FORDO) associated with the N-particle state appearing in the energy expression Eq. (3.8). In order to introduce the variables n and yr, in a well-defined manner, the... 

---