Optimization linear parameters

Instead of using repeated solution of a suitable eigenvalue equation to optimize the orbitals, as in conventional forms of SCF theory, we have found it more convenient to optimize by a gradient method based on direct evaluation of the ener functional (4), ortho normalization being restored after every parameter variation. Although many iterations are required, the energy evaluation is extremely rapid, the process is very stable, and any constraints on the parameters (e.g. due to spatial symmetry or choice of some type of localization) are very easily imposed. It is also a simple matter to optimize with respect to non-linear parameters such as orbital exponents. 

Non-linear parameter estimation is far from a trivial task, even though it is greatly simplified by the availability of user-friendly program packages such as (a) ACSL-OPTIMIZE, (b) MADONNA, (c) a set of BASIC programs (supplied with the book of Nash and Walker-Smith, 1987) or (d) by mathematical software (MATLAB). MADONNA has only limited possibilities for parameter estimation, but MADONNA programs can easily be translated into other more powerful languages. 

The minimum of ssq is near the true values slope= 6 and intercepts20 that were used to generate the data (see Data mxb. m). ssq is continuously increasing for parameters moving away from their optimal values. Analysing that behaviour more closely, we can observe that the valley is parabolic in all directions. In other words, any vertical plane cutting through the surface results in a parabola. In particular, this is also the case for vertical planes parallel to the axes, i.e. ssq versus only one parameter is also a parabola. This is a property of so-called linear parameters. 

Method Linear Parameters to Optimize Direct Use in High Dimensions Data Need to Be Autoscaled... 

The structure of the parametric UA for the 4-RDM satisfies the fourth-order fermion relation (the expectation value of the commutator of four annihilator and four creator operators [26]) for any value of the parameter which is a basic and necessary A-representability condition. Also, the 4-RDM constructed in this way is symmetric for any value of On the other hand, the other A-representability conditions will be affected by this value. Hence it seems reasonable to optimize this parameter in such a way that at least one of these conditions is satisfied. Alcoba s working hypothesis [48] was the determination of the parameter value by imposing the trace condition to the 4-RDM. In order to test this working hypothesis, he constructed the 4-RDM for two states of the BeHa molecule in its linear form Dqo/,. The calculations were carried out with a minimal basis set formed by 14 Hartree-Fock spin orbitals belonging to three different symmetries. Thus orbitals 1, 2, and 3 are cr orbitals 4 and 5 are cr and orbitals 6 and 7 are degenerate % orbitals. The two states considered are the ground state, where... 

M is an positive integer number. Optimal c,- and a, values are found by solving the Hartree-Fock equations in an analytical form, i.e., varying the energy functional with respect to these parameters. Determining non-linear parameters a,- is rather difficult. Therefore quite often they are chosen to be the same for all shells with the given l values. An efficient method of... 

Newman, M. M., "On Attempts to Reduce the Sensitivity of the Optimal Linear Regulator to a Parameter Change,",... 

If the retention vs. composition relationships for the solutes i, i + 1 and j are known, then the gradient parameters A, B and k can readily be calculated for the optimum gradient according to equation 6.6. Not unexpectedly, the value of the shape parameter K turns out to be of little significance for an optimization procedure in which only three solutes affect the result [624]. Therefore, it may be sufficient to optimize the parameters A and B for a linear gradient (k— 1). 

We turn now to the problem of optimizing the non-linear parameters in a wavefunction. As mentioned in the introduction, for non-linear parameters (such as orbital exponents or nuclear positions) traditionally, non-derivative methods of optimization are used. However, if we wish to use a gradient method, for example, we must be able to obtain the required derivatives, subject to the constraints on the non-linear parameters and also subject to the condition that the constraints on the linear parameters continue to be bound during the variant of the non-linear parameters. In the usual closed-shell case, Fletcher5 showed how the linear constraint restriction could be incorporated, providing that one started from a minimum in the linear parameters. Assuming for the moment no particular constraints on the non-linear variables, then starting from a linear-minimum it is easy to see that... 

Procedures 2 and 3 are very convenient when looking for a quick test on the efficiency of adding or not a new CETO set to the expansion (4.4), while optimizing the non-linear parameters. All the procedure becomes simpler when only one function is added, because in this case one has m=l. The (nxm) matrices appear to be column vectors (nxl) and the square (mxm) a and x matrices become (1x1), scalars that is 0=1 and x=(l -t.). ... 

Of course, other choices can be made at the moment to define the / functions, demanding a greater non-linear parameter optimization work. For example, one can propose the general basis set element form ... 

Recover the initial normalization factors and exponents. S.4. Non>linear Parameter Optimization... 

So far only the function forms and the optimization of linear parameters have been discussed, but the WO-CETO chosen basis set in order to expand the exponential product (4.1), even in the simplest form used here, demands optimization of some nonlinear parameters. In this subsection, the related problems are described and discussed. 

S.4.2. Non-linear Parameter Optimization Procedure Description One function at a Time... 

The optimization of basis set non-linear parameters, appearing in equation (5.2), constitute one of the main steps in the preliminary work before many center integral evaluation. There will be described only a step by step procedure in order to optimize non-linear parameters of the involved fimctions one by one. 

In order to have a visualization of the degree of covering of the e B function in terms of the relative error committed when developii the proposed approach, Figure 5.1 shows the error between values and a linear combination Ljq, defined using equation (5.2), after complete linear and non-linear parameter optimization. 

As we have shown in Section 2.A., the extension of the minimum to DZ basis set brings about the decrease in energy. For this extension, of course, a new set of exponents is required. Exponent optimization of STO basis sets, particularly extended basis sets, is not simple, though all one-center integrals appearing in the SCF atomic problem are expressible in closed analytical forms. It involves the optimization of a number of nonlinear parameters, in addition to the same number of linear parameters in eqn. (2.1), Excellent mathematical a-... 

The task is to optimize the local and non-linear parameters for another basis set, (j), which consists of M FSGOs to produce as accurately as possible the pair functions of Gaussian and second order energy of (1), where M < M — N.To start the procedure we have to choose arbitrary FSGOs and construct, = Q ), where Q = a)(a. Wdefine a new set of M orthogonal excited orbitals a via a ) = 4> ), where T is transformation matrix. In order to have optimized virtual orbitals, we write the Fock matrix F = Fo + F, and we have the following expression to F which is similar to the well-known Roothaan equation,... 

Optimization of linear and non-linear parameters in a trial wavefunction by the method of simulated annealing... 

It is not difficult to see that the problem of simultcmeous optimization of linear and non-linear parameters addressed by us eamller in this section has a direct bearing on the MC-SCF method. The only difference lies in the fact that in the conventional MC-SCF scheme, one expands the MC-SCF orbitals in terms of a finite basis set and optimizes the orbital expansion coefficients and not the exponents, to get at the optimal orbital... 

An effective optimization of the linear parameters in can now be performed by globally minimizing a cost function 9 where f is either... 

The methodologies described in the previous section can be invoked to handle the problem of optimization of linear and non-linear parameters in trial J irrespective of the details of the trial function, if the... 

Use of Davis basis set Optimization of linear parameters only... 

Use of STOs Optimization (cyclic or simultaneous) of many linear and a single non-linear parameters... 

---