Nucleophilicity relationship

E. Structure Nucleophilicity Relationship of Carbon Free Radicals... 

The high positional and substrate selectivity of the homol5dic substitutions of protonated heteroaromatic bases with nucleophilic carbon free radicals is one of the main factors determining the S5mthetic success of these reactions. In this section it will be shown that the selectivity is mainly determined by the influence of polar effects. As the extent of these effects is much larger than that previously observed in all the other reactions of the same radicals, these reactions have provided very useful models for determining the structure nucleophilicity relationship of the most common carbon free radicals. 

Although isothiazole (pK = 1.90) is less basic than thiazole, its rale of quaternization by dinitrophenyl acetate in water at 52°C is approximately 2.5 times higher (447). This deviation from the Bronsted relationship (A log k - 0.ApK, with positive) is interpreted as a consequence of the or effect of the adjacent sulfur lone pair in isothiazole that is responsible for its higher nucleophilicity (448, 449). 

A more unusual fact observed in thiazole chemistiy is that also the other positions (4 and 5) are activated toward the nucleophilic substitution, as found independently by Metzger and coworkers (46) and by Todesco and coworkers (30, 47). Some kinetic data are reported in Table V-2. As the data in Table V-2 indicate, no simple relationship between nucleophilic reactivity and charge density, or other parameters available from more or less sophisticated calculation methods, can be applied. As a... 

The nucleophilic reactivity of 2-halogenothiazoles is strongly affected by the substituent effect, depending on the kind of substitution reaction. Positions 4 and 5 can be considered as meta and para , respectively, with regard to carbon 2 and to groups linked to it consequently, it is possible to correlate the reactivity data with Hammett s relationships. 

Monomer Reactivity. The poly(amic acid) groups are formed by nucleophilic substitution by an amino group at a carbonyl carbon of an anhydride group. Therefore, the electrophilicity of the dianhydride is expected to be one of the most important parameters used to determine the reaction rate. There is a close relationship between the reaction rates and the electron affinities, of dianhydrides (12). These were independendy deterrnined by polarography. Stmctures and electron affinities of various dianhydrides are shown in Table 1. 

An especially interesting case of oxygen addition to quinonoid systems involves acidic treatment with acetic anhydride, which produces both addition and esterification (eq. 3). This Thiele-Winter acetoxylation has been used extensively for synthesis, stmcture proof, isolation, and purification (54). The kinetics and mechanism of acetoxylation have been described (55). Although the acetyhum ion is an electrophile, extensive studies of electronic effects show a definite relationship to nucleophilic addition chemistry (56). 

Reactions. Although carbapenems are extremely sensitive to many reaction conditions, a wide variety of chemical modifications have been carried out. Many derivatives of the amino, hydroxy, and carboxy group of thienamycin (2) have been prepared primarily to study stmcture—activity relationships (24). The most interesting class of A/-derivatives are the amidines which are usually obtained in good yield by reaction of thienamycin with an imidate ester at pH 8.3. Introduction of this basic but less nucleophilic moiety maintains or improves the potency of the natural material while greatiy increasing the chemical stabiUty. Thus /V-formimidoyl thienamycin [64221-86-9] (MK 0787) (18), C 2H yN204S, (25) was chosen for clinical evaluation and... 

Scheme 4 shows in a general manner cyclocondensations considered to involve reaction mechanisms in which nucleophilic heteroatoms condense with electrophilic carbonyl groups in a 1,3-relationship to each other. The standard method of preparation of pyrazoles involves such condensations (see Chapter 4.04). With hydrazine itself the question of regiospecificity in the condensation does not occur. However, with a monosubstituted hydrazine such as methylhydrazine and 4,4-dimethoxybutan-2-one (105) two products were obtained the 1,3-dimethylpyrazole (106) and the 1,5-dimethylpyrazole (107). Although Scheme 4 represents this type of reaction as a relatively straightforward process, it is considerably more complex and an appreciable effort has been expended on its study (77BSF1163). Details of these reactions and the possible variations of the procedure may be found in Chapter 4.04. 

A very important relationship between stereochemistry and reactivity arises in the case of reaction at an 5 carbon adjacent to a chiral center. Using nucleophilic addition to the carbonyl group as an example, it can be seen that two diastereomeric products are possible. The stereoselectivity and predictability of such reactions are important in controlling stereochemistry in synthesis. 

A number of years ago an empirical relationship, now called Cram Jr rule, was recognized. When R, R, and R differ in size, and the molecule is oriented such that the largest group is anti to the carbonyl oxygen, the major product arises from addition of the nucleophile syn to the smaller substituent. ... 

One of the most important and general trends in organic chemistry is the increase in carbocation stability with additional alkyl substitution. This stability relationship is fundamental to imderstanding many aspects of reactivity, especially of nucleophilic... 

The term nucleophilicity refers to the effect of a Lewis base on the rate of a nucleophilic substitution reaction and may be contrasted with basicity, which is defined in terms of the position of an equilibrium reaction with a proton or some other acid. Nucleophilicity is used to describe trends in the kinetic aspects of substitution reactions. The relative nucleophilicity of a given species may be different toward various reactants, and it has not been possible to devise an absolute scale of nucleophilicity. We need to gain some impression of the structural features that govern nucleophilicity and to understand the relationship between nucleophilicity and basicity. ... 

There is clearly a conceptual relationship between the properties called nucleophilicity and basicity. Both describe a process involving formation of a new bond to an electrophile by donation of an electron pair. The pA values in Table 5.7 refer to basicity toward a proton. There are many reactions in which a given chemical species might act either as a nucleophile or as a base. It is therefore of great interest to be able to predict viiether a chemical species Y P will act as a nucleophile or as a base under a given set of circumstances. Scheme 5.4 lists some examples. 

The nucleophilic catalysis mechanism only operates when the alkoxy group being hydrolyzed is not much more basic than the nucleophilic catalyst. This relationship can be imderstood by considering the tetrahedral intermediate generated by attack of the potential catalyst on the ester ... 

For these two limiting cases let us write Br nsted-type relationships for variation in the nucleophile, namely. 

We consider first the Sn2 type of process. (In some important Sn2 reactions the solvent may function as the nucleophile. We will treat solvent nucleophilicity as a separate topic in Chapter 8.) Basicity toward the proton, that is, the pKa of the conjugate acid of the nucleophile, has been found to be less successful as a model property for reactions at saturated carbon than for nucleophilic acyl transfers, although basicity must have some relationship to nucleophilicity. Bordwell et al. have demonstrated very satisfactory Brjinsted-type plots for nucleophilic displacements at saturated carbon when the basicities and reactivities are measured in polar aprotic solvents like dimethylsulfoxide. The problem of establishing such simple correlations in hydroxylic solvents lies in the varying solvation stabilization within a reaction series in H-bond donor solvents. 

I, pp. 162-8 jencks PP- uses the selectivity—reactivity relationship between Br nsted slopes and nucleophilic reactivity to distinguish between general acid catalysis and specific acid—general base catalysis. 

The rate of reaction of a series of nucleophiles with a single substrate is related to the basicity when the nucleophilic atom is the same and the nucleophiles are closely related in chemical type. Thus, although the rates parallel the basicities of anilines (Tables VII and VIII) as a class and of pyridine bases (Tables VII and VIII) as a class, the less basic anilines are much more reactive. This difference in reactivity is based on a lower energy of activation as is the reactivity sequence piperidine > ammonia > aniline. Further relationships among the nucleophiles found in this work are morpholine vs. piperidine (Table III) methoxide vs. 4-nitrophenoxide (Table II) and alkoxides vs. piperidine (Tables II, III, and VIII). Hydrogen bonding in the transition state and acid catalysis increase the rates of reaction of anilines. Reaction rates of the pyridine bases are decreased by steric hindrance between their alpha hydrogens and the substituents or... 

---