Nucleation theoretical treatment

As mentioned in Section IX-2A, binary systems are more complicated since the composition of the nuclei differ from that of the bulk. In the case of sulfuric acid and water vapor mixtures only some 10 ° molecules of sulfuric acid are needed for water oplet nucleation that may occur at less than 100% relative humidity [38]. A rather different effect is that of passivation of water nuclei by long-chain alcohols [66] (which would inhibit condensation note Section IV-6). A recent theoretical treatment by Bar-Ziv and Safran [67] of the effect of surface active monolayers, such as alcohols, on surface nucleation of ice shows the link between the inhibition of subcooling (enhanced nucleation) and the strength of the interaction between the monolayer and water. 

Both homogeneous and heterogeneous mechanisms requite relatively high supersaturation, and they exhibit a high order dependence on supersaturation. These factors often lead to production of excessive fines ia systems where primary aucleatioa mechanisms are important. The classical theoretical treatment of primary nucleation results ia the expressioa (5) ... 

The classical theoretical treatment of primary nucleation that produces a spherical nucleus results in the expression ... 

Theoretical treatment of nucleation processes has evolved along two directions. Hettema and McFeaters (1996) refer to these, respectively, as clas sic nucleation theory and the kinetic approach. The kinetic a pproach is based on a set of time-dependent... 

Nucleation is the science investigating the kinetics and thermodynamics of the formation of a new phase of a material at a size just sufficient to be stable. In addition to their role in new particle formation, nucleation processes are also critical to an accurate understanding of a number of other atmospheric events, including cloud droplet activation on CCN, ice formation, and the deliquescence/efflorescence of particles. In this section we focus on the nucleation of new particles through homogeneous nucleation, i.e., from gaseous precursors. The theoretical treatment of new particle nucleation, as well as field and laboratory measurements of nanoparticle formation, are addressed. 

It is obvious that much more experimental work is needed. No theoretical treatment of transition boiling has ever been given. A convincing explanation of why there should be a smooth decrease in h with an increase in AT has never appeared. It is possible to explain the effect in terms of film thickness, but this is a superficial explanation based on the false assumption of a stable film. It is also possible to explain that transition boiling is a mixture of nucleate and film boiling, but this is contrary to photographic evidence. 

The pertinence of transition state theory to nucleation and growth is obvious. This was first pointed out as applicable to the graining behavior of sugar syrups at the Bristol conference in 1949 and considerably elaborated since.2 jjjg continued growth of the crystal, already formed as the critical nucleus or added as seed, is also amenable to the same sort of theoretical treatment the reaction complex being the two-dimensional nucleus, screw... 

Most theoretical treatments of nucleation and crystal growth are based on a model of stepwise addition of molecules to an embryo, up to a critical size, at which the properties of the embryo (e.g. its surface free energy) are equated with those of the known solid phase, i.e. the crystal. ... 

In this section, we introduce a new terminology, the monomer, which is the minimum building unit of a crystal and can both be solvated in solution and precipitate to form crystal. This monomer concept is more convenient and simpler than the conventional term, solute for the theoretical treatment of the nucleation process, because often the solute in solution and the constituent of crystal are not identical. In the remainder of this chapter, the monomer is referred to as M in the equations. 

The nucleation and growth of many anodic films on mercury or on amalgam substrates gives rise to potentiostatic transients which follow the shapes predicted by Equation (9.46) or (9.47) [17], and Fig. 9.17 compares an experimental transient for the growth of monolayers of HgS with the reduced variable curve for progressive nucleation. In many systems electrocrystallisation of subsequent monolayers takes place, and theoretical treatments for this case, involving extensions of the theory outlined here, have appeared in the literature [18]. 

Eder and Wlochowicz [192] crystallized PE at constant cooling rates ranging from 0.5 to 10°C/min. Their experimental data did not conform to the theoretical treatment developed by Ozawa [177]. The authors attributed the deviation from the equation to factors such as secondary crystallization (for polyethylene it may be greater than 40% of the total [140]), dependence of the lamellar thickness on crystallization temperature, and occurrence of different mechanisms of nucleation. However, it is worth commenting that the occurrence of different kinds of nucleation would not affect the validity of Ozawa s equation, but only the value of the Avrami exponent. 

The Kolmogoroff-Avrami formalism can be used without restrictions in the case of 3D, 2D and ID crystallization in three-, two- and onedimensional space, respectively [5.19]. However, the method cannot be applied directly to the nucleation, growth and coalescence of 3D clusters on a plane substrate. The reason is that such clusters caimot grow in the direction perpendicular to the substrate and therefore the spread of the 3D deposit is not random in space [5.53]. Since the formulation of a rigorous theoretical model encounters principle difficulties, here we do not consider this complex case of mass electrocrystaUization. However, theoretical treatment of the nucleation, growth and overlap of circular cones, hemispheres and three-dimensional clusters with more complex geometrical forms can be found in [5.29, 5.53-5.61],... 

Theoretical models available in the literature consider the electron loss, the counter-ion diffusion, or the nucleation process as the rate-limiting steps they follow traditional electrochemical models and avoid any structural treatment of the electrode. Our approach relies on the electro-chemically stimulated conformational relaxation control of the process. Although these conformational movements179 are present at any moment of the oxidation process (as proved by the experimental determination of the volume change or the continuous movements of artificial muscles), in order to be able to quantify them, we need to isolate them from either the electrons transfers, the counter-ion diffusion, or the solvent interchange we need electrochemical experiments in which the kinetics are under conformational relaxation control. Once the electrochemistry of these structural effects is quantified, we can again include the other components of the electrochemical reaction to obtain a complete description of electrochemical oxidation. 

Much of the treatment of nucleation catalysis in the literature is still qualitative, especially analysis of influences such as mechanical shock and ultrasonic vibrations. Heterogeneous nucleation (i.e., catalytic effects of foreign nuclei), however, has received some theoretical attention, building on the early work of Volmer (V6). Considering vapor condensation on a catalyst surface, he proposed using an interfacial contact angle as a mathematical parameter, defined by the equation... 

---