Nuclear structure theory

It is known from nuclear structure theory that nuclei with I > 1 also have an electric quadrupole moment Q, which is a measure of the asphericity of the nucleus. Nuclear quadrupole moments affect the rate of magnetic dipole relaxation, and nuclei with Q 0 are candidates for NQR measurements (see Table 3.3). 

It should be mentioned that Emrich/62/, in the context of many—body nuclear structure theory, also arrived at eq.(5.3.18) for EE, but unfortunately he missed the earlier works. There is also a related earlier paper by Coester/128/. 

This approach, which has been investigated in nuclear structure theory [44], has however not been applied so far for atoms or molecules. 

Realistic nuclear structure theory has traditionally been formulated in a framework which is tailored to the features of the simple mean-field shell model including its strong single-particle (sp) spin-orbit potential [1,2]. The introduction of a small model space which supposedly includes the essential configurations to describe the low-energy excitations, plays a central role in this traditional approach. An important early example of this method is provided by the seminal work of... 

The intrinsic spins of stable nuclei have been determined experimentally, and the values have been explained with modem nuclear structure theory. Tables such as that in Appendix E are available for looking up the spin (I value) of a particular nucleus. The mles of angular momentum coupling are an aid in remembering the intrinsic spins of certain common nuclei. For instance, the helium nucleus, with its even number of protons and neutrons, has an integer spin, I = 0. In terms of the number of protons and neutrons, the carbon-12 nucleus is simply three helium nuclei. It should have an even-integer spin, and it also turns out to be an I = 0 nucleus. The carbon-13 nucleus has one more neutron and thereby has a half-integer spin, I = 1/2. 

Although a separation of electronic and nuclear motion provides an important simplification and appealing qualitative model for chemistry, the electronic Sclirodinger equation is still fomiidable. Efforts to solve it approximately and apply these solutions to the study of spectroscopy, stmcture and chemical reactions fonn the subject of what is usually called electronic structure theory or quantum chemistry. The starting point for most calculations and the foundation of molecular orbital theory is the independent-particle approximation. 

Full quantum wavepacket studies on large molecules are impossible. This is not only due to the scaling of the method (exponential with the number of degrees of freedom), but also due to the difficulties of obtaining accurate functions of the coupled PES, which are required as analytic functions. Direct dynamics studies of photochemical systems bypass this latter problem by calculating the PES on-the-fly as it is required, and only where it is required. This is an exciting new field, which requires a synthesis of two existing branches of theoretical chemistry—electronic structure theory (quantum chemistiy) and mixed nuclear dynamics methods (quantum-semiclassical). 

The equilibrium geometries produced by electronic structure theory correspond to the spectroscopic geometry R, which assumes that there is no nuclear motion. Contrast this to the Rg geometry, defined via the vibrationally-averaged nuclear positions. 

I have found that the assumption that in atomic nuclei the nucleons are in large part aggregated into clusters arranged in closest packing leads to simple explanations of many properties of nuclei. Some aspects of the closest-packing theory of nuclear structure are presented in the following paragraphs.1... 

No simple explanation of the onset of deformation at N = 90 has been advanced. I have found that a simple explanation is provided by the close-packed-spheron theory of nuclear structure. 

During recent decades a great amount of knowledge about the properties of atomic nuclei has been gathered. An extensive theory of nucleonic interactions and nuclear structure [liquid-drop theory (7), shell theory (2, 3), unified theory (4), cluster theory (5—7)] has been developed... 

The close-packed-spheron theory of nuclear structure may be described as a refinement of the shell model and the liquid-drop model in which the geometric consequences of the effectively constant volumes of nucleons (aggregated into spherons) are taken into consideration. The spherons are assigned to concentric layers (mantle, outer core, inner core, innermost core) with use of a packing equation (Eq. I), and the assignment is related to the principal quantum number of the shell model. The theory has been applied in the discussion of the sequence of subsubshells, magic numbers, the proton-neutron ratio, prolate deformation of nuclei, and symmetric and asymmetric fission. 

The introduction of the Bom-Oppenheimer approximation (BOA) set the stage for the development of electronic structure theory and molecular dynamics as separate disciplines. Certainly this separation has been fruitful and has in large measure fostered the rapid development of the fields. However, it is also clear that a comprehensive approach to chemistry must remain cognizant of the interplay between electronic structure and nuclear dynamics. Inferring dynamical behavior... 

Wigner rotation/adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation matrices, 92 Electronic structure theory, electron nuclear dynamics (END) structure and properties, 326-327 theoretical background, 324-325 time-dependent variational principle (TDVP), general nuclear dynamics, 334-337 Electronic wave function, permutational symmetry, 680-682 Electron nuclear dynamics (END) degenerate states chemistry, xii-xiii direct molecular dynamics, structure and properties, 327 molecular systems, 337-351 final-state analysis, 342-349 intramolecular electron transfer,... 

In this minimal END approximation, the electronic basis functions are centered on the average nuclear positions, which are dynamical variables. In the limit of classical nuclei, these are conventional basis functions used in molecular electronic structure theory, and they follow the dynamically changing nuclear positions. As can be seen from the equations of motion discussed above the evolution of the nuclear positions and momenta is governed by Newton-like equations with Hellman-Feynman forces, while the electronic dynamical variables are complex molecular orbital coefficients that follow equations that look like those of the time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) approximation [24]. The coupling terms in the dynamical metric are the well-known nonadiabatic terms due to the fact that the basis moves with the dynamically changing nuclear positions. 

At present, the two-step theory is still accepted, but it leaves out the question of receptor location within the cell so as to be able to cover all members of a family. The receptor, in the absence of hormone, is found associated with other proteins (hsp90, p59, and perhaps others) and very weakly bound to cell structures (nuclear or cytoplasmatic). The arrival of hormones transforms the receptor, freeing it from other proteins, giving it a greater affinity for nuclear structures, and causing it to achieve an active state as a transcription factor (Beato et al. 1996 Beato 1989). The difference is that the receptors not... 

The MO theory differs greatly from the VB approach and the basic MO theory is an extension of the atomic structure theory to molecular regime. MOs are delocalized over the nuclear framework and have led to equations, which are computationally tractable. At the heart of the MO approach lies the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) formahsm... 

Each of the semi-classical trajectory surface hopping and quantum wave packet dynamics simulations has its pros and cons. For the semi-classical trajectory surface hopping, the lack of coherence and phase of the nuclei, and total time per trajectory are cons whereas inclusion of all nuclear degrees of freedom, the use of potentials direct from electronic structure theory, the ease of increasing accuracy by running more trajectories, and the ease of visualization of results are pros. For the quantum wave packet dynamics, the complexity of setting up an appropriate model Hamiltonian, use of approximate fitted potentials, and the... 

Equation (8.1) [which may be compared to (1.246)] defines gN, the nuclear g factor. Note that the protonic charge and mass, e and mp> are used in (8.1), rather than the charge and mass of the nucleus in question. Whereas the electronic g factor can be predicted accurately from theory, theories of nuclear structure are not sufficiently developed to allow the prediction of gN for nuclei. Experimental values of /, gN, and percent abundance for some nuclei are given in the Appendix, Table A.6. 

---