Normalization of wave functions

Next, for the log term (which normalizes the wave function), we have to choose, as in Eq. (15), suitable functions P t) that will correct the behavior of that term along the large semicircles. Among the multiplicity of choices, the following are the most rewarding (since they completely cancel the log term) ... 

So far there have not been any restrictions on the MOs used to build the determinantal trial wave function. The Slater determinant has been written in terms of spinorbitals, eq. (3.20), being products of a spatial orbital times a spin function (a or /3). If there are no restrictions on the form of the spatial orbitals, the trial function is an Unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) wave function. The term Different Orbitals for Different Spins (DODS) is also sometimes used. If the interest is in systems with an even number of electrons and a singlet type of wave function (a closed shell system), the restriction that each spatial orbital should have two electrons, one with a and one with /3 spin, is normally made. Such wave functions are known as Restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF). Open-shell systems may also be described by restricted type wave functions, where the spatial part of the doubly occupied orbitals is forced to be the same this is known as Restricted Open-shell Hartree-Fock (ROHF). For open-shell species a UHF treatment leads to well-defined orbital energies, which may be interpreted as ionization potentials. Section 3.4. For an ROHF wave function it is not possible to chose a unitary transformation which makes the matrix of Lagrange multipliers in eq. (3.40) diagonal, and orbital energies from an ROHF wave function are consequently not uniquely defined, and cannot be equated to ionization potentials by a Koopman type argument. 

A variation of wave function coefficients is subject to constraints like maintaining orthogonality of the MOs, and normalization of the MOs and the total wave function. 

The variation principle then says that the energy E0 of the ground state is the lower bound of the quantity Eq. II.6 for arbitrary normalized trial wave functions W and that further all eigenfunctions satisfy the relation... 

A final example is the concept of QM state. It is often stated that the wave function must be square integrable because the modulus square of the wave function is a probability distribution. States in QM are rays in Hilbert space, which are equivalence classes of wave functions. The equivalence relation between two wave functions is that one wave function is equal to the other multiplied by a complex number. The space of QM states is then a projective space, which by an infinite stereographic projection is isomorphic to a sphere in Hilbert space with any radius, conventionally chosen as one. Hence states can be identified with normalized wave functions as representatives from each equivalence class. This fact is important for the probability interpretation, but it is not a consequence of the probability interpretation. 

It is important to distinguish between mmetiy properties of wave functions on one hand and those of density matrices and densities on the other. The symmetry properties of wave functions are derived from those of the Hamiltonian. The "normal" situation is that the Hamiltonian commutes with a set of symmetry operations which form a group. The eigenfunctions of that Hamiltonian must then transform according to the irreducible representations of the group. Approximate wave functions with the same symmetry properties can be constructed, and they make it possible to simplify the calculations. 

For larger systems, where MP4 calculations are no longer tractable, it is necessary to use scaling procedures. The present results make it possible to derive adapted scaling factors to be applied to the force constant matrix for each level of wave function. They can be determined by comparison of the raw calculated values with the few experimental data, each type of vibration considered as an independent vibrator after a normal mode analysis. 

As we have seen in earlier sections, wave functions can be used to perform useful calculations to determine values for dynamical variables. Table 2.2 shows the normalized wave functions in which the nuclear charge is shown as Z (Z = 1 for hydrogen) for one electron species (H, He+, etc.). One of the results that can be obtained by making use of wave functions is that it is possible to determine the shapes of the surfaces that encompass the region where the electron can be found some fraction (perhaps 95%) of the time. Such drawings result in the orbital contours that are shown in Figures 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5. 

Substituting from the table of associated Laguerre polynomials (1.17) the first few normalized radial wave functions are ... 

In materials in which a metal-insulator transition takes place the antiferromagnetic insulating state is not the only non-metallic one possible. Thus in V02 and its alloys, which in the metallic state have the rutile structure, at low temperatures the vanadium atoms form pairs along the c-axis and the moments disappear. This gives the possibility of describing the low-temperature phase by normal band theory, but this would certainly be a bad approximation the Hubbard U is still the major term in determining the band gap. One ought to describe each pair by a London-Heitler type of wave function... 

All terms on the left vanish except that for n = due to orthogonality property of wave functions and from the conditions of normalization,... 

This phenomenon of vibronic coupling can be treated very effectively by using group theoretical methods. As will be shown in Chapter 10, the vibrational wave function of a molecule can be written as the product of wave functions for individual modes of vibration called normal modes, of which there will be 3n - 6 for a nonlinear, /i-atomic molecule. That is, we can... 

As shown in Section 5.1, the wave functions must form bases for irreducible representations of the symmetry group of the molecule, and the same holds, of course, for all kinds of wave functions, vibrational, rotational, electronic, and so on. Let us now see what representations are generated by the vibrational wave functions of the normal modes. Inserting Hn(Va4,) into 10.6-1, we obtain... 

For a normalized Cl wave function of the type (3 15), expanded in the determinant basis, we obtain the energy as die expectation value of the Hamiltonian (3 24) ... 

The inactive and external orbital spaces have the same properties as for CAS wave functions. The RAS 1 space consists of orbitals in which a certain number of holes may be created. One could for example allow single and double excitations out of this orbital space. Normally, all these orbitals would be doubly occupied in a CAS calculation. The RAS 2 space has the same properties as the active orbital space in a CAS wave function all possible occupations and spin couplings are allowed. Finally the RAS 3 space is allowed to be occupied with up to a given number of electrons. A variety of wave functions can be created using the RAS concept. For example, by making the RAS 2 space empty, one arrives at a conventional singles and doubles (triples,... 

For convenience we shall normalize our wave function to 1 before we make any calculation of the energy. Then... 

The method of CFP is an elegant tool for the construction of wave functions of many-electron systems and the establishment of expressions for matrix elements of operators corresponding to physical quantities. Its major drawback is the need for numerical tables of CFP, normally computed by the recurrence method, and the presence in the matrix elements of multiple sums with respect to quantum numbers of states that are not involved directly in the physical problem under consideration. An essential breakthrough in this respect may be finding algebraic expressions for the CFP and for the matrix elements of the operators of physical quantities. For the latter, in a number of special cases, this can be done using the eigenvalues of the Casimir operators [90], however, it would be better to have sufficiently simple but universal formulas for the CFP themselves. 

Normalize the wave functions of the 2A2 and 2B, states of allyl radical (Eqs. 7.2 and 7.3 in the main text) by assuming zero-overlap between AOs. Then calculate the weights of each determinant by squaring their coefficients. From these reproduce quantitatively the spin density distribution for both states, given qualitatively in Fig. 7.3b. 

Normalizing the wave function for the 2A2 ground state of allyl, we get... 

At this stage, we have an isolated matrix element which expresses the momentum conservation law. In addition, owing to the normalization, intranuclear wave functions of all nuclei, except the radioactive one and its daughter nucleus, have disappeared. Further factorization of the matrix element, Eq. (A.14), is presented in the main text [see the four paragraphs preceding Eq. (12)]. It leads to the following simplifications in Eq. (A.14) (1) it is possible to compute the wave function of the radioactive nucleus Pnucl>II for the equilibrium position of its center of mass Rn = R° (2) the wave functions of the leptons may be assigned the values they have on the surface of the radioactive nucleus. This factorizes the matrix element, Eq. (A.14), further ... 

DODS) is also sometimes used. If the interest is in systems with an even number of electrons and a singlet type of wave function (a closed shell system), the restriction that each spatial orbital should have two electrons, one with a and one with j3 spin, is normally made. Such wave functions are known as Restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF). Open-shell systems may also be described by restricted type wave functions, where the spatial part of the doubly occupied orbitals is forced to be the same this is known as Rp.strirted Open-shell Hartree-Fock (RQHF). For open-shell species a UHF treatment... 

---