Nonideal flow in reactors 267

FIG. 19-6 Some examples of nonideal flow in reactors. (Fig. Ill in Levenspiel, Chemical Reaction Engineering, John Wiley ir Sons, 1999.)... 

A mathematical model for nonideal flow in a vessel provides a characterization of the mixing and flow behavior. Although it may appear to be an independent alternative to the experimental measurement of RTD, the latter may be required to determine the parameters) of the model. The ultimate importance of such a model for our purpose is that it may be used to assess the performance of the vessel as a reactor (Chapter 20). 

Our treatment of Chemical Reaction Engineering begins in Chapters 1 and 2 and continues in Chapters 11-24. After an introduction (Chapter 11) surveying the field, the next five Chapters (12-16) are devoted to performance and design characteristics of four ideal reactor models (batch, CSTR, plug-flow, and laminar-flow), and to the characteristics of various types of ideal flow involved in continuous-flow reactors. Chapter 17 deals with comparisons and combinations of ideal reactors. Chapter 18 deals with ideal reactors for complex (multireaction) systems. Chapters 19 and 20 treat nonideal flow and reactor considerations taking this into account. Chapters 21-24 provide an introduction to reactors for multiphase systems, including fixed-bed catalytic reactors, fluidized-bed reactors, and reactors for gas-solid and gas-liquid reactions. 

Obviously, many such combinations can be assembled and the intelligent application of a given combined model to interpretation of nonideal flows in a particular reactor must rely on additional information concerning geometric properties such as stirrer placement, feed inlet and product withdrawal placement, corners or internal structural elements leading to dead volumes, and so on. A certain amount of intuition is also a useful commodity in each modeling. ... 

In the next section, some models of nonideal flow through reactors will be introduced. Each model will contain a parameter (or parameters) that may have to be determined from tracer response experiments. For a given model, the unknown parameters usually can be determined from the moments of the tracer curve. 

Different reactor networks can give rise to the same residence time distribution function. For example, a CSTR characterized by a space time Tj followed by a PFR characterized by a space time t2 has an F(t) curve that is identical to that of these two reactors operated in the reverse order. Consequently, the F(t) curve alone is not sufficient, in general, to permit one to determine the conversion in a nonideal reactor. As a result, several mathematical models of reactor performance have been developed to provide estimates of the conversion levels in nonideal reactors. These models vary in their degree of complexity and range of applicability. In this textbook we will confine the discussion to models in which a single parameter is used to characterize the nonideal flow pattern. Multiparameter models have been developed for handling more complex situations (e.g., that which prevails in a fluidized bed reactor), but these are beyond the scope of this textbook. [See Levenspiel (2) and Himmelblau and Bischoff (4).]... 

These two types of deviations occur simultaneously in actual reactors, but the mathematical models we will develop assume that the residence time distribution function may be attributed to one or the other of these flow situations. The first class of nonideal flow conditions leads to the segregated flow model of reactor performance. This model may be used... 

ILLUSTRATION 11.6 USE OF THE DISPERSION MODEL TO DETERMINE THE CONVERSION LEVEL OBTAINED IN A NONIDEAL FLOW REACTOR... 

A stirred-tank flow reactor may be single-stage or multistage. As an ideal backmix flow reactor, it is referred to as a CSTR or multistage CSTR this is treated in Chapter 14. Nonideal flow effects are discussed in Chapter 20. 

Ideal flow is introduced in Chapter 2 in connection with the investigation of kinetics in certain types of ideal reactor models, and in Chapter 11 in connection with chemical reactors as a contrast to nonideal flow. As its name implies, ideal flow is a model of flow which, in one of its various forms, may be closely approached, but is not actually achieved. In Chapter 2, three forms are described backmix flow (BMF), plug flow (PF), and laminar flow (LF). 

In general, each form of ideal flow can be characterized exactly mathematically, as can the consequences of its occurrence in a chemical reactor (some of these are explored in Chapter 2). This is in contrast to nonideal flow, a feature which presents one of the major difficulties in assessing the design and performance of actual reactors, particularly in scale-up from small experimental reactors. This assessment, however, may be helped by statistical approaches, such as provided by residence-time distributions. It... 

Equation 13.5-2 is the segregated-flow model (SFM) with a continuous RTD, E(t). To what extent does it give valid results for the performance of a reactor To answer this question, we apply it first to ideal-reactor models (Chapters 14 to 16), for which we have derived the exact form of E(t), and for which exact performance results can be compared with those obtained independently by material balances. The utility of the SFM lies eventually in its potential use in situations involving nonideal flow, wheic results cannot be predicted a priori, in conjunction with an experimentally measured RTD (Chapters 19 and 20) in this case, confirmation must be done by comparison with experimental results. 

In this chapter, we consider nonideal flow, as distinct from ideal flow (Chapter 13), of which BMF, PF, and LF are examples. By its nature, nonideal flow cannot be described exactly, but the statistical methods introduced in Chapter 13, particularly for residence time distribution (RTD), provide useful approximations both to characterize the flow and ultimately to help assess the performance of a reactor. We focus on the former here, and defer the latter to Chapter 20. However, even at this stage, it is important to realize that ignorance of the details of nonideal flow and inability to predict accurately its effect on reactor performance are major reasons for having to do physical scale-up (bench —> pilot plant - semi-works -> commercial scale) in the design of a new reactor. This is in contrast to most other types of process equipment. 

The TIS and DPF models, introduced in Chapter 19 to describe the residence time distribution (RTD) for nonideal flow, can be adapted as reactor models, once the single parameters of the models, N and Pe, (or DL), respectively, are known. As such, these are macromixing models and are unable to account for nonideal mixing behavior at the microscopic level. For example, the TIS model is based on the assumption that complete backmixing occurs within each tank. If this is not the case, as, perhaps, in a polymerization reaction that produces a viscous product, the model is incomplete. 

The tanks-in-series (TIS) model for a reactor with nonideal flow uses the ITS flow model described in Section 19.4.1 and illustrated in Figure 19.11. The substance A is now a reacting species (e.g., A - products) instead of a tracer. 

In this section, we apply the axial dispersion flow model (or DPF model) of Section 19.4.2 to design or assess the performance of a reactor with nonideal flow. We consider, for example, the effect of axial dispersion on the concentration profile of a species, or its fractional conversion at the reactor outlet. For simplicity, we assume steady-state, isothermal operation for a simple system of constant density reacting according to A - products. 

In the quantitative development in Section 24.4 below, we assume the flow to be ideal, but more elaborate models are available for nonideal flow (Chapter 19 see also Kastanek et al., 1993, Chapter 5). Examples of types of tower reactors are illustrated schematically in Figure 24.1, and are discussed more fully below. An important consideration for the efficiency of gas-liquid contact is whether one phase (gas or liquid) is dispersed in the other as a continuous phase, or whether both phases are continuous. This is related to, and may be determined by, features of the overall reaction kinetics, such as rate-determining characteristics of mass transfer and intrinsic reaction. 

In a bubble-column reactor for a gas-liquid reaction, Figure 24.1(e), gas enters the bottom of the vessel, is dispersed as bubbles, and flows upward, countercurrent to the flow of liquid. We assume the gas bubbles are in PF and the liquid is in BMF, although nonideal flow models (Chapter 19) may be used as required. The fluids are not mechanically agitated. The design of the reactor for a specified performance requires, among other things, determination of the height and diameter. 

We deliberately separate the treatment of characterization of ideal flow (Chapter 13) and of nonideal flow (Chapter 19) from the treatment of reactors involving such flow. This is because (1) the characterization can be applied to situations other than those involving chemical reactors and (2) it is useful to have the characterization complete in the two locations so that it can be drawn on for whatever reactor application ensues in Chapters 14-18 and 20-24. We also incorporate nonisothermal behavior in the discussion of each reactor type as it is introduced, rather than treat this behavior separately for various reactor types. 

The main difficulties of design of catalytic reactors reduce to the following two questions (1) How do we account for the nonisothermal behavior of packed beds and (2) How do we account for the nonideal flow of gas in fluidized beds. 

---