Segregated-flow model

These two types of deviations occur simultaneously in actual reactors, but the mathematical models we will develop assume that the residence time distribution function may be attributed to one or the other of these flow situations. The first class of nonideal flow conditions leads to the segregated flow model of reactor performance. This model may be used... 

In the segregated flow model the contents of the volume elements of the fluid do not mix with one another as they move through the reactor. Each element may be considered as a small closed system that moves through the reactor. The different systems spend varying amounts of time in the reactor, giving rise to the measured residence time distribution func-... 

The basic premise of the segregated flow model is that the various fluid elements move through the reactor at different speeds without mixing with one another. Consequently, each little fluid element will behave as if it were a batch reactor operating at constant pressure. The conversions attained within the various fluid elements will be equal to those in batch reactors with holding times equal to the residence times of the different fluid elements. The average conversion level in the effluent is then given by... 

ILLUSTRATION 11.5 USE OF THE SEGREGATED FLOW MODEL TO DETERMINE THE CONVERSION LEVEL OBTAINED IN A NON-IDEAL FLOW REACTOR... 

Use the F(t) curve generated in Illustration 11.1 to determine the fraction conversion that will be achieved in the reactor if it is used to carry out a first-order reaction with a rate constant equal to 3.33 x 10 3 sec-1. Base the calculations on the segregated flow model. 

This result compares to a value of 0.666 predicted on the basis of the segregated flow model. Excellent agreement should be obtained for the first-order case if the dispersion parameter gives a good fit of the experimental F(t) curve. Agreement for reaction orders other than unity will not be nearly as good. 

Use the F(t) curve for two identical CSTR s in series and the segregated flow model to predict the conversion achieved for a first-order reaction with k = 0.4 ksec-1. The space time for an individual reactor is 0.9 ksec. Check your results using an analysis for two CSTR s in series. 

Quantitative molecular-property relationship Segregated-flow model Reduced folate carrier protein... 

K. S., A new physiologically based, segregated-flow model to explain route-dependent intestinal metabolism, Drug. Metab. Dispos. 2000, 28, 224-235. 

In this chapter, we focus on the characteristics of the ideal-flow models themselves, without regard to the type of process equipment in which they occur, whether a chemical reactor, a heat exchanger, a packed tower, or some other type. In the following five chapters, we consider the design and performance of reactors in which ideal flow occurs. In addition, in this chapter, we introduce the segregated-flow model for a reactor as one application of the flow characteristics developed. 

The chapter begins with a reiteration and extension of terms used, and the types of ideal flow considered. It continues with the characterization of flow in general by age-distribution functions, of which residence-time distributions are one type, and with derivations of these distribution functions for the three types of ideal flow introduced in Chapter 2. It concludes with the development of the segregated-flow model for use in subsequent chapters. 

Equation 13.5-2 is the segregated-flow model (SFM) with a continuous RTD, E(t). To what extent does it give valid results for the performance of a reactor To answer this question, we apply it first to ideal-reactor models (Chapters 14 to 16), for which we have derived the exact form of E(t), and for which exact performance results can be compared with those obtained independently by material balances. The utility of the SFM lies eventually in its potential use in situations involving nonideal flow, wheic results cannot be predicted a priori, in conjunction with an experimentally measured RTD (Chapters 19 and 20) in this case, confirmation must be done by comparison with experimental results. 

To simplify the treatment for an LFR in this chapter, we consider only isothermal, steady-state operation for cylindrical geometry, and for a simple system (A - products) at constant density. After considering uses of an LFR, we develop the material-balance (or continuity) equation for any kinetics, and then apply it to particular cases of power-law kinetics. Finally, we examine the results in relation to the segregated-flow model (SFM) developed in Chapter 13. 

Micromixing between these two extremes (partial segregation) is possible, but not considered here. A model for (1) is the segregated-flow model (SFM) and for (2) is the maximum-mixedness model (MMM) (Zwietering, 1959). We use these in reactor models in Chapter 20. 

In addition to these two macromixing reactor models, in this chapter, we also consider two micromixing reactor models for evaluating the performance of a reactor the segregated flow model (SFM), introduced in Chapters 13 to 16, and the maximum-mixedness model (MMM). These latter two models also require knowledge of the kinetics and of the global or macromixing behavior, as reflected in the RTD. 

For n > 1, the segregated flow model provides the upper bound on conversion, and the maximum-mixedness model defines the lower bound. 

For n < 1, the maximum-mixedness model sets the upper bound, while the lower bound is determined by the segregated-flow model. 

Comparison of the segregated-flow and maximum-mixedness models, with identical RTD functions, shows that the former gives better performance. This is consistent with the observations of Zwietering (1959), who showed that for power-law kinetics of order n > 1, the segregated-flow model produces the highest conversion. 

Compare this result with that predicted by the segregated-flow model. 

P5.07.04. MM AND SEGREGATED FLOW MODELS. NUMERICAL TRACER RESPONSE DATA... 

In some important cases, limiting models for chemical conversion are the segregated flow model represented by the equation... 

---