Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Neutron reflectivity surface

The polymer concentration profile has been measured by small-angle neutron scattering from polymers adsorbed onto colloidal particles [70,71] or porous media [72] and from flat surfaces with neutron reflectivity [73] and optical reflectometry [74]. The fraction of segments bound to the solid surface is nicely revealed in NMR studies [75], infrared spectroscopy [76], and electron spin resonance [77]. An example of the concentration profile obtained by inverting neutron scattering measurements appears in Fig. XI-7, showing a typical surface volume fraction of 0.25 and layer thickness of 10-15 nm. The profile decays rapidly and monotonically but does not exhibit power-law scaling [70]. [Pg.402]

In neutron reflectivity, neutrons strike the surface of a specimen at small angles and the percentage of neutrons reflected at the corresponding angle are measured. The an jular dependence of the reflectivity is related to the variation in concentration of a labeled component as a function of distance from the surface. Typically the component of interest is labeled with deuterium to provide mass contrast against hydrogen. Use of polarized neutrons permits the determination of the variation in the magnetic moment as a function of depth. In all cases the optical transform of the concentration profiles is obtained experimentally. [Pg.50]

Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the neutron reflectivity measurement with the neutrons incident on the surface and refiected at an angle 6 with respect to the surface. The angie 62 is the angle of refraction. The specimen in this case is a uniform film with thickness d, on a substrate. Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the neutron reflectivity measurement with the neutrons incident on the surface and refiected at an angle 6 with respect to the surface. The angie 62 is the angle of refraction. The specimen in this case is a uniform film with thickness d, on a substrate.
The measurements of concentration gradients at surfaces or in multilayer specimens by neutron reflectivity requires contrast in the reflectivity fiDr the neutrons. Under most circumstances this means that one of the components must be labeled. Normally this is done is by isotopic substitution of protons with deuterons. This means that reflectivity studies are usually performed on model systems that are designed to behave identically to systems of more practical interest. In a few cases, however (for organic compounds containing fluorine, for example) sufficient contrast is present without labeling. [Pg.666]

Neutron reflectivity measures the variation in concentration normal to the surface of the specimen. This concentration at any depth is averaged over the coherence length of the neutrons (on the order of 1 pm) parallel to the sur ce. Consequendy, no information can be obtained on concentration variadons parallel to the sample surface when measuring reflectivity under specular conditions. More imponantly, however, this mandates that the specimens be as smooth as possible to avoid smearing the concentration profiles. [Pg.666]

The interface properties can usually be independently measured by a number of spectroscopic and surface analysis techniques such as secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), specular neutron reflection (SNR), forward recoil spectroscopy (FRES), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), infrared (IR) and several other methods. Theoretical and computer simulation methods can also be used to evaluate H t). Thus, we assume for each interface that we have the ability to measure H t) at different times and that the function is well defined in terms of microscopic properties. [Pg.354]

Li ZX, Dong CC, and Thomas RK. 1999. Neutron reflectivity studies of the surface excess of Gemini surfactants at the air-water interface. Langmuir 15(13) 4392 -396. [Pg.56]

The use of neutron reflectivity at liquid interfaces, which is a method sensitive to both surface roughness and surfactant layer thickness, was reviewed with the examples of polydimethylsiloxane-surfactant layers.633 Sum-frequency generation (SFG) vibrational spectroscopy was applied to study surface restructuring behavior of PDMS in water in an attempt to understand antifouling properties of silicones.6 ... [Pg.683]

Lenzen, R., Triimper, J. (1978), Reflection of X rays by neutron star surfaces , Nature 271, 216. [Pg.71]

Figure 8.6 Comparison of the influence of non-ionic Ci2E6 (hexaoxyethyl-ene ft-dodecyl ether) or anionic SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) on adsorbed amount of p-lactoglobulin at the air-water interface (0.1 wt% protein, pH = 6, ionic strength = 0.02 M, 25 °C) as determined by neutron reflectivity measurements. Protein surface concentration is plotted against the aqueous phase surfactant concentration ( ) Ci2E6 ( ) SDS. Reproduced from Dickinson (2001) with permission. Figure 8.6 Comparison of the influence of non-ionic Ci2E6 (hexaoxyethyl-ene ft-dodecyl ether) or anionic SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) on adsorbed amount of p-lactoglobulin at the air-water interface (0.1 wt% protein, pH = 6, ionic strength = 0.02 M, 25 °C) as determined by neutron reflectivity measurements. Protein surface concentration is plotted against the aqueous phase surfactant concentration ( ) Ci2E6 ( ) SDS. Reproduced from Dickinson (2001) with permission.
The effect on structure of confining block copolymers in thin films has been examined, largely using neutron reflectivity and atomic force microscopy. A number of features that result from the constraint of reduced dimensionality have been reported, such as the observation of islands and holes at the surface... [Pg.5]

Fig. 2.54 Neutron reflectivity profile for a symmetric PS-dPMMA diblock (Mw 30 kg moP1) as a function of incident wavevector (Russell 1990). The inset shows the scattering length density (b/V, the neutron scattering length per unit volume) profile normal to the film surface that was used to calculate the reflectivity profile shown as the solid line, This is typical of a block copolymer film containing a multilayer stack, with lamellae parallel to the surface. Fig. 2.54 Neutron reflectivity profile for a symmetric PS-dPMMA diblock (Mw 30 kg moP1) as a function of incident wavevector (Russell 1990). The inset shows the scattering length density (b/V, the neutron scattering length per unit volume) profile normal to the film surface that was used to calculate the reflectivity profile shown as the solid line, This is typical of a block copolymer film containing a multilayer stack, with lamellae parallel to the surface.
Fig. 2.59 Neutron reflectivity profiles for a PS-riPMMA symmetric diblock copolymer (Mw = 29.7kgmor ) film of total thickness 5232 A (Menelle et al. 1992). Experiments were performed on samples annealed at the temperatures shown. The solid lines were computed using the scattering length density profiles shown in the insets, which show that the surface induces lamellar order even above the bulk ODT 157 8°C (the air-polymer interface is located at z - 0). [Pg.115]

The effect of constraints introduced by confining diblock copolymers between two solid surfaces was examined by Lambooy et al. (1994) and Russell et al. (1995). They studied a symmetric PS-PMMA diblock sandwiched between a silicon substrate, and silicon oxide evaporated onto the top (homopolymer PMMA) surface. Neutron reflectivity showed that lamellae formed parallel to the solid interfaces with PMMA at both surfaces. The period of the confined multilayers deviated from the bulk period in a cyclic manner as a function of the confined film thickness, as illustrated in Fig. 2.60. First-order transitions were observed at t d0 = (n + j)d0, where t is the film thickness and d0 is the bulk lamellar period, between expanded states with n layers and states with (n + 1) layers where d was contracted. Finally, the deviation from the bulk lamellar spacing was found to decrease with increasing film thickness (Lambooy et al. 1994 Russell et al. 1995). These experimental results are complemented by the phenomenologi-... [Pg.116]

Forciniti, D., and Hamilton, W. A. (2005). Surface enrichment of proteins at quartz/water interfaces a neutron reflectivity study. J. Col. Interface Sci. 285,458-468. [Pg.136]


See other pages where Neutron reflectivity surface is mentioned: [Pg.660]    [Pg.663]    [Pg.666]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.732]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.1121]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.1019]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.14]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.28 ]




SEARCH



Neutron reflectance

Neutron reflection

Neutron reflectivity

Neutron reflectivity surface layer thickness

Neutron reflectivity surface roughness

Surface reflectance

Surface reflectivity

© 2024 chempedia.info