Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Nanoparticles size distribution

Iridium and rhodium nanoparticles have also been studied in the hydrogenation of various aromatic compoimds. In all cases, total conversions were not observed in BMI PF6. TOFs based on mol of cyclohexane formed were 44 h for toluene hydrogenation with Ir (0) and 24 h and 5 h for p-xylene reduction with lr(0) or Rh(0) nanoparticles, respectively. The cis-1,4-dimethylcyclohexane is the major product and the cisitrans ratio depends on the nature of the metal 5 1 for lr(0) and 2 1 for Rh(0). TEM experiments show a mean diameter of 2.3 nm and 2.1 nm for rhodium and iridium particles, respectively. The same nanoparticle size distribution is observed after catalysis (Fig. 4). [Pg.268]

Figure 8. TEM and optical absorption of the sample implanted with 5 x 10 Au /cm (a) TEM cross-sectional micrograph (dashed lines represent the free surface and film-substrate interface) (b) nanoparticles size distribution (c) simulated optical spectra (1) Au cluster in a non-absorbing medium with n = 1.6 (2) Au cluster in polyimide (absorbing) (3) Au(core)-C(shell) cluster in a nonabsorbing medium with n = 1.6 (4) the experimental spectrum of Au-implanted polyimide sample, (d) X-ray diffraction patterns as a function of the implantation fiuence. Figure 8. TEM and optical absorption of the sample implanted with 5 x 10 Au /cm (a) TEM cross-sectional micrograph (dashed lines represent the free surface and film-substrate interface) (b) nanoparticles size distribution (c) simulated optical spectra (1) Au cluster in a non-absorbing medium with n = 1.6 (2) Au cluster in polyimide (absorbing) (3) Au(core)-C(shell) cluster in a nonabsorbing medium with n = 1.6 (4) the experimental spectrum of Au-implanted polyimide sample, (d) X-ray diffraction patterns as a function of the implantation fiuence.
Reed Justin A, Andrew C, Halaas HJ, Paul P, Alex R, Thomas MJ, Grieser F (2003) The effects of microgravity on nanoparticle size distributions generated by the ultrasonic reduction of an aqueous gold-chloride solution. Ultrason Sonochem 10(4—5) 285-289... [Pg.269]

Figure 2.11 TEM images and nanoparticle size distributions of nanopartides synthesized from a modified Brust arrested precipitation technique (a) under ambient conditions and (b) at an applied C02 pressure of 33.0 bar. Figure 2.11 TEM images and nanoparticle size distributions of nanopartides synthesized from a modified Brust arrested precipitation technique (a) under ambient conditions and (b) at an applied C02 pressure of 33.0 bar.
Figure 21.2 Assembly of mesosfructured hybrids, (a) Nanoparticles smaller than the darker gray block s R0 are miscible and assemble into a lamellar structure, (b) Nanoparticles larger than the darker gray block s R0 segregate, forming a nanoparticle-rich core around which lamellae assemble into an onion-type structure, (c) This can be used to generate compositionally heterogeneous nanostructures from tailored nanoparticle size distributions.10 (Reprinted with permission from S. C. Warren et al., Nature Mater. 2007, 6, 156-161. Copyright 2007 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.)... Figure 21.2 Assembly of mesosfructured hybrids, (a) Nanoparticles smaller than the darker gray block s R0 are miscible and assemble into a lamellar structure, (b) Nanoparticles larger than the darker gray block s R0 segregate, forming a nanoparticle-rich core around which lamellae assemble into an onion-type structure, (c) This can be used to generate compositionally heterogeneous nanostructures from tailored nanoparticle size distributions.10 (Reprinted with permission from S. C. Warren et al., Nature Mater. 2007, 6, 156-161. Copyright 2007 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.)...
Narayanan R, El-Sayed MA (2004) Effect of colloidal catalysis on the nanoparticle size distribution dendiimer-Pd vs PVP-Pd nanoparticles catalyzing the Suzuki coupling reaction. J Phys Chem B 108 8572... [Pg.413]

The stability of the catalyst allows several reuses with only slight loss of activity. A similar nanoparticles size distribution was observed before and after catalysis. [Pg.193]

The catalytic nanoparticles possess unique catalytic properties due to their large surface area and considerable number of surface atoms leading to an increased amount of active sites [1-3]. The catalytic properties of nanoparticles depend on the nanoparticle size, nanoparticle size distribution, and nanoparticle environment [4]. Moreover, the surface of nanoparticles plays an important role in catalysis, being responsible for their selectivity and activity. As was demonstrated in the last decade, the formation of nanoparticles in a nanostructured polymeric environment allows enhanced control over nanoparticle characteristics, yet the stabilizing polymer (its functionality) is of great importance, determining the state of the nanoparticle surface [5-8]. [Pg.93]

Fig. 5.3 TEM images, nanoparticle size distributions and electron diffraction patterns of 7-Fe20j silica aerogel nanocomposites prepared by the impregnation method using as metal precursors anhydrous ferrous acetate (Ac) and anhydrous ferrous acetylacetonate (Aac). Fig. 5.3 TEM images, nanoparticle size distributions and electron diffraction patterns of 7-Fe20j silica aerogel nanocomposites prepared by the impregnation method using as metal precursors anhydrous ferrous acetate (Ac) and anhydrous ferrous acetylacetonate (Aac).
Table 3 presents the data on nanoparticle size distribution for FP-7 sample after heat treatment at 500 C, 600°C, 650°C, 675°C, and 700°C. It is evident that increasing of temperature brought about the visible effect on the decreasing of the mean size of nanoparticles. Moreover, the particle size distribution for the sample was rather narrow when it was kept at 500°C compared to higher temperatures. [Pg.82]

Narayanan, R. and El-Sayed, M. A. Effect of Catalytic Activity on the MetaUic Nanoparticle Size Distribution Electron-Transfer Reaction between Fe(CN)6 and Thiosulfate Ions Catalyzed by PVP-Platinum Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B,107(45), 12416-12424 (2003). [Pg.419]

The above consideration of nanoparticles has been carried out in a supposition that they have more or less the same size. To be more precise, we assumed that the width of the nanoparticles sizes distribution function is smaller then its mean value. The mean value R is usually extracted from, e.g., X-Ray diffraction measurements [91] and it is supposed, that the size of all the particles corresponds to R. In this part we will show, that the neglection of sizes distribution can lead to incorrect results, when measurements are performed on the samples with essential scattering of sizes. Besides that, actually the size distribution defines the spectral lines inhomogeneous broadening. Moreover, it essentially influences the observed anomalies of many physical properties (like specific heat and dielectric or magnetic permittivity) of nanomaterials. Note that in real nanomaterials, like nanoparticles powders and/or nanogranular ceramics there is unavoidable size distribution which in general case should be taken into account. However, we will show below, that in perfect samples, where the width of size distribution is small, it is possible to suppose safely that all particles have the same size. In this part we primarily follow the approaches from the paper [92]. [Pg.138]

In general case the nanoparticles size distribution essentially influence all physical properties of nanomaterials. Its parameters Rq and a can be extracted from the measurements of their physical properties, as it was shown on the example of specific heat. [Pg.144]

Equation (3.106) allows to calculate /(co) for paramagnetic centers with axial symmetry crystalline field constant D being proportional to P or P. This includes the materials with phase transitions of the first or the second order (see Eq. 3.103) and for any type of nanoparticles size distribution function /(/ ). The EPR spectra for all above cases have been calculated in Ref. [101], All the spectfa have the same characteristic feature at particles size decrease. Namely, it is the broadening of the axial symmetry spectral lines and the increase of intensity of cubic spectral lines. Figure 3.31 illustrates this EPR spectra transformation under the influence of size distribution function parameters Rq,o) and critical radius Rc. [Pg.152]

Fig. 3.42 The distribution function of the activation energies for different parameters of nanoparticles size distribution function (Eq.3.131) A = 2nm(l) 10 nm (2) 20 nm (3) ... Fig. 3.42 The distribution function of the activation energies for different parameters of nanoparticles size distribution function (Eq.3.131) A = 2nm(l) 10 nm (2) 20 nm (3) ...
R. Narayanan, M.A. El-Sayed, Effect of Colloidal Catalysis on the Nanoparticle Size Distribution Dendrimer-Pd vs. PVP-Pd Nanoparticles Catalyzing the Suzuki Coupling Reaction, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 108, 8572, 2004. [Pg.234]

FIGURE 1.206 Comparison of the pore (voids between nanoparticles) size distributions calculated using four methods (1) NMR cryoporometry and (2) NMR relaxometry, (3) and (4) TSDC cryoporometry (aqueous suspensions at Cj, qq=3-1 wt%), and (5) PSD calculated using the nitrogen adsorption isotherm (SCV/SCR model, see Section 1.1.1). [Pg.235]

Typically, the higher the specific surface area of nanosilicas, the narrower the nanoparticle size distribution (Figure 4.36). This affects the penetration of silica nanoparticles in broad pores of AC microparticles (Figures 4.33 and 4.34) and decomposition of AC microparticles (Figure 4.35) during MCA. A-50 particles are observed in the mixture (Figure 4.35a) in contrast to A-300/AC and A-500/AC. [Pg.569]

FIGURE 4.36 Primary nanoparticle size distributions of silicas estimated from the adsorption data using the SCR procedure with the model of voids between spherical nanoparticles. (Adapted from A/ / /. Surf. ScL, 258, Gun ko, V.M., Zaulychnyy, Ya.V., Ilkiv, B.I. et al.. Textural and electronic characteristics of mechanochemically activated composites with nanosilica and activated carbon, 1115-1125,2011f, Copyright 2011, with permission from Elsevier.)... [Pg.570]


See other pages where Nanoparticles size distribution is mentioned: [Pg.1050]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.605]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.896]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.2341]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.817]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.567]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.260 ]




SEARCH



Metallic nanoparticle composites size distribution

Nanoparticle monodisperse size distribution

Nanoparticles distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info