Multistep methods explicit

The multistep method (5.25) is explicit if bQ = 0, otherwise it is implicit. These latter are the best ones due to their improved stability properties. To use an implicit formula, however, we need an initial estimate of yi+1. The basic idea of the predictor - corrector methods is to estimate y1+1 by a p-th order explicit formula, called predictor, and then to refine yi+1 by a p-th order implicit formula, which is said to be the corrector. 

Various integration methods were tested on the dynamic model equations. They included an implicit iterative multistep method, an implicit Euler/modified Euler method, an implicit midpoint averaging method, and a modified divided difference form of the variable-order/variable-step Adams PECE formulas with local extrapolation. However, the best integrator for our system of equations turned out to be the variable-step fifth-order Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg method. This explicit method was used for all of the calculations presented here. 

Predictor-Corrector methods have been constructed attempting to combine the best properties of the explicit and implicit methods. The multistep methods are using information at more than two points. The additional points are ones at which data has already been computed. In one view, Adams methods arise from underlying quadrature formulas that use data outside of specifically approximate solutions computed prior to t . 

In order to construct higher-order approximations one must use information at more points. The group of multistep methods, called the Adams methods, are derived by fitting a polynomial to the derivatives at a number of points in time. If a Lagrange polynomial is fit to /(t TO, V )i. .., f tn, explicit method of order m- -1. Methods of this tirpe are called Adams-Bashforth methods. It is noted that only the lower order methods are used for the purpose of solving partial differential equations. The first order method coincides with the explicit Euler method, the second order method is defined by ... 

A /(-order Runge-Kutta method requires at least p calculations of the system f(y, t) at each integration step the same-order explicit multistep method needs a single system evaluation. 

In the current terminology for multistep methods, the use of the explicit method is denoted as P (prediction), the calculation of the functions f with E (evaluation), and the correction obtained by means of an implicit method with C (correction). 

This method requires that the positions (and forces) be known at two successive points h apart in time in order to initialize the iteration. These might be generated by using the Verlet method or some other self-starting scheme. Beeman s algorithm is explicit since, given q , q - andp , one directly obtains q + and then, q i, and thus p +i, with only one new force evaluation. Because it is a partitioned multistep method, its analysis is more involved than for the one-step methods, and, in particular its qualitative features are difficult to relate to those of the flow map. The order of accuracy of the scheme above can be shown to be three. 

If bm = 0, we have an explicit or open method, in which w,+i is explicitly given in terms of previously determined values. The explicit method constitutes one of the two types of multistep methods. For example. 

In practice, implicit multistep methods are used to improve upon approximations obtained by explicit methods. This combination is the so-called predictor-corrector method. Predictor-corrector methods employ a single-step method, such as the Runge-Kutta of order 4, to generate the starting values to an explicit method, such as an Adams-Bashforth. Then the approximation from the explicit method is improved upon by use of an implicit method, such as an Adams-Moulton method. Also, there are variable step size algorithms associated with the predictor-corrector strategy in the literature [5,25]. 

The computational cost of the LU-SSOR scheme is comparable to that of the two-step explicit scheme. The damping properties of the error of the LU-SSOR method tend to be a bit worse when compared to explicit multistep methods, such as the simplified Runge-Kutta method. However, implicit or semi-implicit methods are preferred to solve stiff systems of equations. 

Among the explicit multistep methods, the Adams-Bashforth methods are the most widely used. The second-order (global error) Adams-Bashforth two-step method is... 

The implicit multistep methods add stability but require more computation to evaluate the implicit part. In addition, the error coefficient of the Adams-Moulton method of order k is smaller than that of the Adams Bashforth method of the same order. As a consequence, the implicit methods should give improved accuracy. In fact, the error coefficient for the imphcit fourth-order Adams Moulton method is 19/720, and for the explicit fourth-order Adams Bashforth method it is 251/720. The difference is thus about an order of magnitude. Pairs of exphcit and implicit multistep methods of the same order are therefore often used as predictor-corrector pairs. In this case, the explicit method is used to calculate the solution,, at v +i. Furthermore, the imphcit method (corrector) uses y + to calculate /(x +i,y +i), which replaces /(x +i,y +i). This allows the solution, y +i, to be improved using the implicit method. The combination of the Adams Bashforth and the Adams Moulton methods as predictor orrector pairs is implemented in some ODE solvers. The Matlab odel 13 solver is an example of a variable-order Adams Bashforth Moulton multistep solver. 

Another way of classifying the integration techniques depends on whether or not the method is explicit, semi-implicit, or implicit. The implicit and semi-implicit methods play an important role in the numerical solution of stiff differential equations. To maintain the continuity of the section, we will first describe the explicit integration techniques in the context of one-step and multistep methods. The concept of stiffness and implicit methods are considered in a separate subsection, which also marks the end of this section. 

For example, in the case of the third-order multistep algorithm of the family of explicit Adams-Bashforth methods and of implicit Adams-Moulton methods,... 

Euler s and RK methods are also known as one-step techniques which use function values only in a single step, that is, in the preceding step. However, in the multistep techniques, evaluation of each step requires function values from more than one of the preceding steps. The benefit of the multistep techniques is the use of additional information to obtain more accurate solutions. The Adams-Bashforth methods for explicit solution of Equation 11.1 are multi-step in nature and are given in second and fourth orders in Equations 11.19 and 11.20, respectively, as follows ... 

Multistep generalizations of this approach have first been introduced and discussed by Arevalo [Are93], extrapolation methods based on this idea were introduced by Lubich [Lub91] and resulted in the code MEXX [LENP95]. Ostermann investigated half-explicit extrapolation methods for index-3 problems [Ost90]. 

---