Multistep methods implicit

For simultaneous solution of (16), however, the equivalent set of DAEs (and the problem index) changes over the time domain as different constraints are active. Therefore, reformulation strategies cannot be applied since the active sets are unknown a priori. Instead, we need to determine a maximum index for (16) and apply a suitable discretization, if it exists. Moreover, BDF and other linear multistep methods are also not appropriate for (16), since they are not self-starting. Therefore, implicit Runge-Kutta (IRK) methods, including orthogonal collocation, need to be considered. 

The multistep method (5.25) is explicit if bQ = 0, otherwise it is implicit. These latter are the best ones due to their improved stability properties. To use an implicit formula, however, we need an initial estimate of yi+1. The basic idea of the predictor - corrector methods is to estimate y1+1 by a p-th order explicit formula, called predictor, and then to refine yi+1 by a p-th order implicit formula, which is said to be the corrector. 

Various integration methods were tested on the dynamic model equations. They included an implicit iterative multistep method, an implicit Euler/modified Euler method, an implicit midpoint averaging method, and a modified divided difference form of the variable-order/variable-step Adams PECE formulas with local extrapolation. However, the best integrator for our system of equations turned out to be the variable-step fifth-order Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg method. This explicit method was used for all of the calculations presented here. 

Predictor-Corrector methods have been constructed attempting to combine the best properties of the explicit and implicit methods. The multistep methods are using information at more than two points. The additional points are ones at which data has already been computed. In one view, Adams methods arise from underlying quadrature formulas that use data outside of specifically approximate solutions computed prior to t . 

In the current terminology for multistep methods, the use of the explicit method is denoted as P (prediction), the calculation of the functions f with E (evaluation), and the correction obtained by means of an implicit method with C (correction). 

If bm 7 0, we have an implicit or closed method, since w,+i occurs on both sides of Equation 9.60. The implicit method constitutes the second of the two types of multistep methods. For example. 

In practice, implicit multistep methods are used to improve upon approximations obtained by explicit methods. This combination is the so-called predictor-corrector method. Predictor-corrector methods employ a single-step method, such as the Runge-Kutta of order 4, to generate the starting values to an explicit method, such as an Adams-Bashforth. Then the approximation from the explicit method is improved upon by use of an implicit method, such as an Adams-Moulton method. Also, there are variable step size algorithms associated with the predictor-corrector strategy in the literature [5,25]. 

The computational cost of the LU-SSOR scheme is comparable to that of the two-step explicit scheme. The damping properties of the error of the LU-SSOR method tend to be a bit worse when compared to explicit multistep methods, such as the simplified Runge-Kutta method. However, implicit or semi-implicit methods are preferred to solve stiff systems of equations. 

ODE45 Runge-Kutta fourth-order method with fifth-order error prediction. ODE23s Rosenbrock. Implicit low-order method for stiff problems. ODE113 Adams method. Multistep method. 

Figure 4.1 Absolute value of error constants for different multistep methods. (For fc = 1 the Adams-Moulton method is the implicit Euler method.)...

Neither the Runge-Kutta nor tiie Adams Bashforth methods can handle stiff differential equations well. The Adams-Moulton method is an implicit multistep method that can handle stiff problems better (stiff problems are dicussed later in this chapter). The two-step Adams-Moulton method (third-order accurate) is... 

The implicit multistep methods add stability but require more computation to evaluate the implicit part. In addition, the error coefficient of the Adams-Moulton method of order k is smaller than that of the Adams Bashforth method of the same order. As a consequence, the implicit methods should give improved accuracy. In fact, the error coefficient for the imphcit fourth-order Adams Moulton method is 19/720, and for the explicit fourth-order Adams Bashforth method it is 251/720. The difference is thus about an order of magnitude. Pairs of exphcit and implicit multistep methods of the same order are therefore often used as predictor-corrector pairs. In this case, the explicit method is used to calculate the solution,, at v +i. Furthermore, the imphcit method (corrector) uses y + to calculate /(x +i,y +i), which replaces /(x +i,y +i). This allows the solution, y +i, to be improved using the implicit method. The combination of the Adams Bashforth and the Adams Moulton methods as predictor orrector pairs is implemented in some ODE solvers. The Matlab odel 13 solver is an example of a variable-order Adams Bashforth Moulton multistep solver. 

Another way of classifying the integration techniques depends on whether or not the method is explicit, semi-implicit, or implicit. The implicit and semi-implicit methods play an important role in the numerical solution of stiff differential equations. To maintain the continuity of the section, we will first describe the explicit integration techniques in the context of one-step and multistep methods. The concept of stiffness and implicit methods are considered in a separate subsection, which also marks the end of this section. 

For example, in the case of the third-order multistep algorithm of the family of explicit Adams-Bashforth methods and of implicit Adams-Moulton methods,... 

To improve the accuracy of the method an implicit multistep scheme is taken into consideration ... 

In Fig. 4.8 the stability region of the three stage Radau Ila method is displayed. One realizes that the stability of the Radau method is much alike the stability of the implicit Euler method, though the three stage Radau method has order 5. Again we note the property i (0) = 1 which corresponds to zero stability in the multistep case. 

---