Multipolar operators

The three components of the rotational tensor linear order. These symmetry strains are shown in fig. 4. p = corresponds to the fully symmetric volume strain. Deformations of the local environment lead to deformations of the 4f-charge cloud, microscopically one therefore has a coupling of strains to multipolar operators Op of the 4f shell. These are polynomials in J, and of degree 1 = 2, 4 and 6 which again transform as irreducible point-group representations. In the cubic case the quadrupolar (/ = 2) operators are ... 

The lshi2uka cell (39—41), another multipolar cell that has been ia use by Showa Titanium (Toyama, Japan), is a cylindrical cell divided ia half by a refractory wall. Each half is further divided iato an electrolysis chamber and a metal collection chamber. The electrolysis chamber contains terminal and center cathodes, with an anode placed between each cathode pair. Several bipolar electrodes are placed between each anode—cathode pair. The cell operates at 670°C and a current of 50 kA, which is equivalent to a 300 kA monopolar cell. 

The Alcan process has been used commercially by Osaka Titanium Co. ia Amagasaki, Japan. Multipolar ceUs of 1000 t/yr capacity are ia operation. Energy consumption is about 9.5—10 kWh/kg of magnesium metal (111). 

The algebra of U(4) can be written in terms of spherical tensors as in Table 2.1. This is called the Racah form. The square brackets in the table denote tensor products, defined in Eq. (1.25). Note that each tensor operator of multipolarity X has 2X+ 1 components, and thus the total number of elements of the algebra is 16, as in the uncoupled form. 

The number of multipole parameters is reduced by the requirements of symmetry. As discussed in chapter 3, the only allowed multipolar functions are those having the symmetry of the site, which are invariant under the local symmetry operations. For example, only / = even multipoles can have nonzero populations on a centrosymmetric site, while for sites with axial symmetry the dipoles must be oriented along the symmetry axis. For a highly symmetric site having 6 mm symmetry, the lowest allowed / 0 is d66+ all lower multipoles being forbidden by the symmetry. The index-picking rules listed in appendix D give the information required for selection of the allowed parameters. 

Multipolarity l is the quantity of the angular momentum type. However, in electron transition theory it normally characterizes the rank of the tensor of the corresponding operator that is why further on we shall denote it as k. 

There exists another more consistent way of obtaining the electron transition operators. We can start with the quantum-electrodynamical description of the interaction of the electromagnetic field with an atom. In this case we find the relativistic operators of electronic transitions with respect to the relativistic wave functions. After that they may be transformed to the well-known non-relativistic ones, accounting for the relativistic effects, if necessary, as corrections to the usual non-relativistic operators. Here we shall consider the latter in more detail. It gives us a closed system of universal expressions for the operators of electronic transitions, suitable to describe practically the radiation in any atom or ion, including very highly ionized atoms as well as the transitions of any multipolarity and any type of radiation (electric or magnetic). 

By evaluating the commutator of Q q with Hnr the generalization of the acceleration form of the transition operator to cover the case of electric multipole transitions of any multipolarity was obtained [77]. Unfortunately, the resultant operator has a much more complex and cumbersome form than Q q and Q q, since it contains both one-electron and two-electron parts. 

All selection rules are contained in the expressions for matrix elements of the electron transition operators. Therefore, not knowing them cannot cause the occurrence of false transitions, because they will be automatically equal to zero. However, studies of the selection rules allow us in many cases to determine the transition type and multipolarity (Ek or Mk), and to estimate their relative intensities without carrying out accurate... 

As we have seen from the selection rules for non-relativistic magnetic dipole (M1) radiation, these transitions are permitted only between levels of one and the same configuration. However, this is not so for higher multipolarities (k > 1). Therefore we present here the appropriate formulas to cover the general cases needed in practice. So, it may be of use to have the following expression for the submatrix element of the operator of Mfc-transitions between the levels of two different two-shell configurations ... 

Several methods can be distinguished within the framework of the perturbative approach. Some [29-37] are based on a multipolar expansion of the operator i.e. the interaction potential of the two species, others rely on the linear response theory [38,39]. 

If we restrict ourselves to only the multipolar mechanism of formation of the dipole moment, then using the gradient formula we obtain for the pth spherical component (v = 0, 1) of the operator of the dipole moment induced by the multipole moment Qim of molecule 1 in polarizable molecule 2 the following expression ... 

Alternatively, the Hamiltonian for fhe radiation field in multipolar formalism may be written explicitly in terms of fhe Maxwell field operators. From the second term of Eq. (2), fhe Hamiltonian density for the electromagnetic field is... 

Fourier series mode expansions for the multipolar electric displacement and magnetic field operators may be written in terms of fhe creation and destruction operators as... 

Earlier in this section it was commented on how the minimal-coupling QED Hamiltonian is obtained from fhe classical Lagrangian function. A few words are in order regarding the derivation of the multipolar Hamiltonian (6). One method involves the application of a canonical transformation to the minimal-coupling Hamiltonian [32]. In classical mechanics, such a transformation renders the Poisson bracket and Hamilton s canonical equations of motion invariant. In quantum mechanics, a canonical transformation preserves both the commutator and Heisenberg s operator equation of motion. The appropriate generating function that converts H uit is propor-... 

It would be relatively easy to extend here our computer symbolic calculations to the hyperpolarizability part of the pair polarizability [see Eqs. (5) and (7)]. However, from all our numerical computations done for N2, C02, and CF4, it results that nonlinear part of the pair polarizability has a weak influence on the resulting spectrum (for details, see Refs. 8, 13, and 15-18). Bearing in mind these results in this review, we restrict our discussion to multipolar light scattering mechanisms. Formula (22) allows us to write the following simple symbolic program in Mathematica calculating the analytical form of the autocorrelation function (16) for a selected dipole-arbitrary order multipole induction operator ... 

Coefficients tpIf 12 Involved in the Rayleigh Isotropic and Depolarized light Scattering Correlation Functions Fzx(t) = 2N j2 j2 cp Sn(t) Rj1(t) Rj2(t) for the Successive Multipolar Induction Operators... 

Coefficients (pj 1 - 2 Involved in Raman Isotropic and Depolarized Light Scattering Correlation Functions Fu.(t) = Y.N,h,h wli 1 12 SN(t)Rj1(t)Rh(t)F+ for Successive Multipolar Induction Operators... 

Here // < is the Hamiltonian for the radiation field in vacuo, flmo the field-free Hamiltonian for molecule , and //m( is a term representing molecular interaction with the radiation. It is worth emphasising that the basic simplicity of Eq. (1) specifically results from adoption of the multipolar form of light-matter interaction. This is based on a well-known canonical transformation from the minimal-coupling interaction [17-21]. The procedure results in precise cancellation from the system Hamiltonian of all Coulombic terms, save those intrinsic to the Hamiltonian operators for the component molecules hence no terms involving intermolecular interactions appear in Eq. (1). 

Here rs. and 4. are the coordinate vectors of electrons i and / belonging to ions S and A, respectively / is the nuclear separation and if is the dielectric constant. The various multipolar terms appear from a power series expansion of the denominator. This expansion was expressed by Kushida (17) in terms of tensor operators. The leading terms are the electric dipole-dipole (EDD), dipole-quadrupole (EQD) and quadrupole-quadrupole (EQQ) interaction. These have radial dependence of/ -3,/ -4 and/ -5 respectively. 

Section III focuses on problems of system topology and documents, using results obtained from a series of model calculations, how the separate influences of system size, dimensionality, and reaction pathway(s) can be disentangled, and the principal effects on reaction efficiency quantified. With these factors clarified. Section IV demonstrates how these trends and correlations change when a multipolar potential is operative between reaction partners, both confined to a compartmentalized system. More general diffusion-reaction systems are described in Section V, where effects arising from nonrandom distributions of reaction centers and, secondly, the influence of multipolar potentials in influencing catalytic processes in crystalline and semiamorphous zeolites are explored. The conclusions drawn from these studies are then summarized in Section VI. 

A number of further insights can be drawn if the effect of a multipolar potential operative between coreactants in finite zeolite structures (crystallites) is considered. These studies will be reviewed in Section IV and Section V.B. 

---