Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Multi-density approach approximations

In this chapter we will provide a critical review of the use of 2- and 4-component relativistic Hamiltonians combined with all-electron methods and appropriate basis sets for the study of lanthanide and actinide chemistry. These approaches provide in principle the more rigorous treatment of the electronic structure but typically demand large computational resources due to the large basis sets that are required for accurate energetics. A complication is furthermore the open-shell nature of many systems of practical interest that make black box application of conventional methods impossible. Especially for calculations in which electron correlation is explicitly considered one needs to find a balance between the appropriate treatment of the multi-reference nature of the wave function and the practical limitations encountered in the choice of an active space. For density functional theory (DFT) calculations one needs to select the appropriate density functional approximation (DFA) on basis of assessments for lighter elements because little or no high-precision experimental information on isolated molecules is available for the f elements. This increases the demand for reliable theoretical ( benchmark ) data in which all possible errors due to the inevitable approximations are carefully checked. In order to do so we need to understand how f elements differ from the more commonly encountered main group elements and also from the d elements with which they of course share some characteristics. [Pg.55]

For multi-electron systems, it is not feasible, except possibly in the case of helium, to solve the exact atom-laser problem in 3 -dimensional space, where n is the number of electrons. One might consider using time-dependent Hartree Fock (TDHF) or the time-dependent local density approximation to represent the state of the system. These approaches lead to at least njl coupled equations in 3-dimensional space which is much more attractive computationally. For example, in TDHF the wave function for a closed shell system can be approximated by a single Slater determinant of time dependent orbitals,... [Pg.154]

A set of observed data points is assumed to be available as samples from an unknown probability density function. Density estimation is the construction of an estimate of the density function from the observed data. In parametric approaches, one assumes that the data belong to one of a known family of distributions and the required function parameters are estimated. This approach becomes inadequate when one wants to approximate a multi-model function, or for cases where the process variables exhibit nonlinear correlations [127]. Moreover, for most processes, the underlying distribution of the data is not known and most likely does not follow a particular class of density function. Therefore, one has to estimate the density function using a nonparametric (unstructured) approach. [Pg.65]

In the following it will be outlined, how the parity violating potentials are computed within a sum-over-states approach, namely on the uncoupled Hartree-Fock (UCHF) level, and within the configuration interaction singles approach (CIS) which is equivalent to the Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA), that avoids, however, the sum over intermediate states. Then a further extension is discussed, namely the random phase approximation (RPA) and an implementation along similar lines within a density functional theory (DFT) ansatz, and finally a multi-configuration linear response approach is described, which represents a systematic procedure that... [Pg.233]

The Bayesian time-domain approach presented in this chapter addresses this problem of parametric identification of linear dynamical models using a measured nonstationary response time history. This method has an explicit treatment on the nonstationarity of the response measurements and is based on an approximated probability density function (PDF) expansion of the response measurements. It allows for the direct calculation of the updated PDF of the model parameters. Therefore, the method provides not only the most probable values of the model parameters but also their associated uncertainty using one set of response data only. It is found that the updated PDF can be well approximated by an appropriately selected multi-variate Gaussian distribution centered at the most probable values of the parameters if the problem is... [Pg.161]

To apply the theory as an infinite-order perturbation theory we must approximate ggs (1... n H-1) in such a way that the infinite sum over all chain graphs can be performed. For this we take the same approach as in Section IV.B and approximate the multi-body correlation functions with Eq. (36). Like Eq. (81), the superposition Eq. (36) treats higher-order effects in a density-independent way by incorporating purely geometric constraints in the association model. Wrth Eq. (36), the infinite sum in Eq. (71) for M oo can be approximated as follows ... [Pg.32]


See other pages where Multi-density approach approximations is mentioned: [Pg.1081]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.826]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.792]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.623]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.1718]    [Pg.47]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.27 , Pg.28 ]




SEARCH



Density approximate

Multi-density approach

© 2024 chempedia.info