Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Moving electrode electrolyte controllers

Important features of a slip-ring motor Starting of slipring motors Hypothetical procedure to calculate the rotors resistance Speed control of slip-ring motors Moving electrode electrolyte starters and controllers... [Pg.996]

The concept of controlling the molecular architecture at the electrode/electrolyte interface was not known until 30 years ago. Electrodes that can be prepared by deliberately immobilizing selected chemicals to display the desired electrochemical and other properties of the immobilized species are called chemically modified electrodes (CMEs). Since the emergence of CMEs, the field of electrochemistry has moved from traditional studies confined to inert electrode materials (such as bare C, Au, Hg, and Pt) at the interface. [Pg.4376]

Rotating electrodes may be inconvenient in some applications when further devices like spectrometers shall be coupled with them in hyphenated techniques or because of noise caused by the inherently necessary contact brushes. Consequently, attempts have been made to move the electrolyte solution instead in a controlled fashion. In the case of the wall-tube electrode, a jet of electrolyte solution from a nozzle with diameter d is directed towards a circular electrode with radius r (with d larger than the electrode diameter 2r) embedded at distance h in insulating material as depicted below (Fig. 7). [Pg.272]

The kinetics of ion backspillover on the other hand will depend on two factors On the rate, I/nF, of their formation at the tpb and on their surface diffusivity, Ds, on the metal surface. As will be shown in Chapters 4 and 5 the rate of electrochemically controlled ion backspillover is normally limited by I/nF, i.e. the slow step is their transfer at the tpb. Surface diffusion is usually fast. Thus, as shown in Chapter 5, for the case of Pt electrodes where reliable surface O diffusivity data exist, obtained by Gomer and Lewis several years ago,76 Ds is at least 4.-10 11 cm2/s at 400°C and thus an O2 ion can move at least 1 pm per s on a Pt(lll) or Pt(110) surface. Therefore ion backspillover from solid electrolytes onto electrode surface is not only thermodynamically feasible, but can also be quite fast on the electrode surface. But does it really take place This we will see in the next Chapter. [Pg.106]

Electrooxidation of the pyrrole unit results in the formation of a pyrrole polymer that coats the electrode surface as it is formed. The amount of polymer deposited can be controlled by the number of CV cycles into the pyrrole oxidation wave. With 30, thick polymer layers give broad CV waves in the quinone voltage region, but thinner layers produce a well-resolved wave for the quinone 0/—1 reduction, which is reasonably stable when the electrodes are placed into fresh electrolyte solution with no 30. As in solution, addition of different urea derivatives causes this wave to shift positive. The relative magnitude of the shifts mirror that seen in solution. Furthermore, the 2 moves back to the original potential when the derivatized electrode is put back into a blank solution containing no urea. [Pg.24]

Polypyrrole Film Formation in Glucose Oxidase Enzyme Solution. Cyclic voltammograms recorded in the GOD and pyrrole solution showed an anodic peak current (E = 1.08 V), which suggested the polymerization of pyrrole in the above solution. However, the polymerization potential moved toward the more positive direction compared to the polymerization potential of PPy doped with Cl ( pa < 1.0 V). This is due to the fact that the polymerization is more difficult to take place in enzyme solution than in Cl solution because the enzyme solution is a much weaker electrolyte than NaCl it may also be due to the less conductive nature of the PPy-GOD film as compared to that of the PPy-Cl film. The polymerization current level was much lower in the enzyme solution than in the Cl solution because of the poor charge-transport property of the enzyme protein molecules. It was found that the constant current method was more suitable than the controlled potential method for making the PPy-GOD film on the GC electrode. [Pg.141]

The scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) technique introduced in recent years by Allen Bard is another area where the smallness of the electrode is essential [38]. The principle in SECM is a mobile UME inserted in an electrolyte solution. The UME is normally operated in a potentiostatic manner in an unstirred solution so that the current recorded is controlled solely by the spherical diffusion of the probed substance to the UME. The current can be quantified from Eqs. 48, 49, or 89 as long as the electrode is positioned far from other interfaces. However, if a solid body is present in the electrolyte solution, the diffusion of the substance to the UME is altered. For instance, when the position of the UME is lowered in the z direction, that is, towards the surface of the object, the diffusion will be partially blocked and the current decreases. By monitoring of the current while the electrode is moved in the x-y plane, the topology of the object can be graphed. The spatial resolution is about 0.25 pm. In one investigation carried out by Bard et al, the... [Pg.543]

The working fluid in an electrochemical system is the electrolyte. When an electric potential is applied across two electrodes in a system, the positive ions of the electrolyte will move toward the cathode, while the negative ions move toward the anode. Hie movement of the ions is controlled by (1) migration due to the electric field, (2) diffusion because of the ion... [Pg.1223]

The barrel-plunger cell design (Figs. 4.45 and 4.46) allows the working electrode to be withdrawn into the bulk electrolyte during the potential step and then returned to the window to record the spectrum. The electrode can be moved manually [422], as shown in Figs. 4.45 and 4.46, or by computer control [423]. Since its development by Pons et al. [424], this technique has been widely applied [356, 425-428]. [Pg.367]


See other pages where Moving electrode electrolyte controllers is mentioned: [Pg.81]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.671]    [Pg.696]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.853]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.605]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.4678]   


SEARCH



Electrode control

Electrode controlling

Electrode electrolytes

Moving electrodes

© 2024 chempedia.info