Molecular properties linear response

Linear response function approaches were introduced into the chemistry literature about thirty years ago Ref. [1,2]. At that time they were referred to as Green functions or propagator approaches. Soon after the introduction it became apparent that they offered a viable and attractive alternative to the state specific approaches for obtaining molecular properties as excitation energies, transition moments and second order molecular properties. 

Besides the elementary properties of index permutational symmetry considered in eq. (7), and intrinsic point group symmetry of a given tensor accounted for in eqs. (8)-(14), much more powerful group-theoretical tools [6] can be developed to speed up coupled Hartree-Fock (CHF) calculations [7-11] of hyperpolarizabilities, which are nowadays almost routinely periformed in a number of studies dealing with non linear response of molecular systems [12-35], in particular at the self-consistent-field (SCF) level of accuracy. 

When Jens Oddershede was elected a Fellow of the American Physical Society in 1993, the citation read For contribution to the theory, computation, and understanding of molecular response properties, especially through the elucidation implementation of the Polarization Propagator formalism. Although written more than a decade ago, it is still true today. The common thread that has run through Jens work for the past score of years is development of theoretical methods for studying the response properties of molecules. His primary interest has been in the development and applications of polarization propagator methods for direct calculation of electronic spectra, radiative lifetime and linear and non-linear response properties such as dynamical dipole polarizabilities and... 

The static dipole polarizability is the linear response of an atomic or molecular system to the application of a weak static electric field [1], It relates to a great variety of physical properties and phenomena [2-5]. Because of its importance, there have been numerous ab initio calculations of isolated atomic and molecular polarizabilities [6-14]. Particular theoretical attention has been dedicated to the polarizability of free atomic anions [15-21] because of its fragility and difficulty in obtaining direct experimental results. In recent years theoretical studies have... 

In this chapter, we therefore consider whether it is possible to eliminate spin-orbit coupling from four-component relativistic calculations. This is a situation quite different from that of more approximate relativistic methods where a considerable effort is required for the inclusion of spin-orbit coupling. We have previously shown that it is indeed possible to eliminate spin-orbit coupling from the calculation of spectroscopic constants [12,13]. In this chapter, we consider the extension of the previous result to the calculation of second-order electric and magnetic properties, i.e., linear response functions. Although the central question of this article may seem somewhat technical, it will be seen that its consideration throws considerable light on the fundamental interactions in molecular systems. We will even claim that four-component relativistic theory is the optimal framework for the understanding of such interactions since they are inherently relativistic. 

Abstract The computational study of excited states of molecular systems in the condensed phase implies additional complications with respect to analogous studies on isolated molecules. Some of them can be faced by a computational modeling based on a continuum (i.e., implicit) description of the solvent. Among this class of methods, the polarizable continuum model (PCM) has widely been used in its basic formulation to study ground state properties of molecular solutes. The consideration of molecular properties of excited states has led to the elaboration of numerous additional features not present in the PCM basic version. Nonequilibrium effects, state-specific versus linear response quantum mechanical description, analytical gradients, and electronic coupling between solvated chromophores are reviewed in the present contribution. The presentation of some selected computational results shows the potentialities of the approach. 

The next section (Sect. 2) is devoted to a lengthy discussion of the molecular hypothesis from the point of view of quantum field theory, and this provides the basis for the subsequent discussion of optical activity. Having used linear response theory to establish the equations for optical activity (Sect. 3), we pause to discuss the properties of the wavefunctions of optically active isomers in relation to the space inversion operator (Sect. 4), before indicating how the general optical activity equations can be related to the usual Rosenfeld equation for the optical rotation in a chiral molecule. Finally (Sect. 5), there are critical remarks about what can currently be said in the microscopic quantum-mechanical theory of optical activity based on some approximate models of the field theory. 

Jensen, L., Duijnen P.Th. van and Snijders J.G., A discrete solvent reaction field model for calculating molecular linear response properties in solution. J.Chem.Phys. (2003) 119 12998-13006. 

Our present focus is on density functional theory and coupled cluster methods for describing molecular systems interacting with a structured environment, and we focus on the derivation of linear response properties and compare the expressions that we obtain for the two different electronic structure methods. Based on linear response... 

An alternative approach to DS study is to examine the dynamic molecular properties of a substance directly in the time domain. In the linear response approximation, the fluctuations of polarization caused by thermal motion are the same as for the macroscopic rearrangements induced by the electric field [27,28], Thus, one can equate the relaxation function < )(t) and the macroscopic dipole correlation function (DCF) V(t) as follows ... 

Terms of higher order in the field amplitudes or in the multipole expansion are indicated by. . . The other two tensors in (1) are the electric polarizability ax and the magnetizability The linear response tensors in (1) are molecular properties, amenable to ab initio computations, and the tensor elements are functions of the frequency m of the applied fields. Because of the time derivatives of the fields involved with the mixed electric-magnetic polarizabilities, chiroptical effects vanish as a> goes to zero (however, f has a nonzero static limit). Away from resonances, the OR parameter is given by [32]... 

We observe that these contributions to the response equations have the same structure as the response equations for the molecule in vacuum [83]. We note that the implementation of these modifications to the vacuum MCSCF response equations gives us the possibility of investigating linear and nonlinear molecular properties of molecular systems interacting with heterogeneous dielectric media. 

---