Molecular orbital time-dependent

The time dependence of the molecular wave function is carried by the wave function parameters, which assume the role of dynamical variables [19,20]. Therefore the choice of parameterization of the wave functions for electronic and nuclear degrees of freedom becomes important. Parameter sets that exhibit continuity and nonredundancy are sought and in this connection the theory of generalized coherent states has proven useful [21]. Typical parameters include molecular orbital coefficients, expansion coefficients of a multiconfigurational wave function, and average nuclear positions and momenta. We write... 

In this minimal END approximation, the electronic basis functions are centered on the average nuclear positions, which are dynamical variables. In the limit of classical nuclei, these are conventional basis functions used in moleculai electronic structure theoiy, and they follow the dynamically changing nuclear positions. As can be seen from the equations of motion discussed above the evolution of the nuclear positions and momenta is governed by Newton-like equations with Hellman-Feynman forces, while the electronic dynamical variables are complex molecular orbital coefficients that follow equations that look like those of the time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) approximation [24]. The coupling terms in the dynamical metric are the well-known nonadiabatic terms due to the fact that the basis moves with the dynamically changing nuclear positions. 

This expression is derived as the Fourier transform of a time-dependent one-particle autocorrelation function (26) (i.e. propagator), and cast in matrix form G(co) over a suitable molecular orbital (e.g. HF) basis, by means of the related set of one-electron creation (ai" ") and annihilation (aj) operators. In this equation, the sums over m and p run over all the states of the (N-1)- and (N+l)-electron system, l P > and I P " respectively. Eq and e[ represent the energy of the... 

Molecular rearrangement resulting from molecular collisions or excitation by light can be described with time-dependent many-electron density operators. The initial density operator can be constructed from the collection of initially (or asymptotically) accessible electronic states, with populations wj. In many cases these states can be chosen as single Slater determinants formed from a set of orthonormal molecular spin orbitals (MSOs) im as / =... 

However, TDSE permits an analysis of the time-dependent population of the molecular orbitals during the tunneling, which is unavailable with the TISE. 

Fig. 2 Electronic conduction of a benzene ring between two conducting electrodes. These calculations are performed by the time-dependent method presented here (solid line) and by the ESQC method (dashed line). The electrodes are connected either in ortho (left column) or meta (right column) position. Two regimes are investigated tunneling with v = —0.25 ev (upper row), pseudoballistic with v = —2 ev (lower row). The vertical dashed lines represent the energy of the benzene s molecular orbitals...

Time-dependent response theory concerns the response of a system initially in a stationary state, generally taken to be the ground state, to a perturbation turned on slowly, beginning some time in the distant past. The assumption that the perturbation is turned on slowly, i.e. the adiabatic approximation, enables us to consider the perturbation to be of first order. In TD-DFT the density response dp, i.e. the density change which results from the perturbation dveff, enables direct determination of the excitation energies as the poles of the response function dP (the linear response of the KS density matrix in the basis of the unperturbed molecular orbitals) without formally having to calculate a(co). 

In principle there are three methods of calculation the ab initio molecular orbital (MO) method, the semiempirical MO method, and molecular mechanics. The choice depends on a number of factors such as the size of the molecule, the type of information required, and the budget. Whereas the ab initio method is the most basic and reliable quantum mechanical method,t the time requirement is so... 

The scheme we employ uses a Cartesian laboratory system of coordinates which avoids the spurious small kinetic and Coriolis energy terms that arise when center of mass coordinates are used. However, the overall translational and rotational degrees of freedom are still present. The unconstrained coupled dynamics of all participating electrons and atomic nuclei is considered explicitly. The particles move under the influence of the instantaneous forces derived from the Coulombic potentials of the system Hamiltonian and the time-dependent system wave function. The time-dependent variational principle is used to derive the dynamical equations for a given form of time-dependent system wave function. The choice of wave function ansatz and of sets of atomic basis functions are the limiting approximations of the method. Wave function parameters, such as molecular orbital coefficients, z,(f), average nuclear positions and momenta, and Pfe(0, etc., carry the time dependence and serve as the dynamical variables of the method. Therefore, the parameterization of the system wave function is important, and we have found that wave functions expressed as generalized coherent states are particularly useful. A minimal implementation of the method [16,17] employs a wave function of the form ... 

The UV Vis spectrum of 34 features a broad band centered at 363 nm, E— 17,400mol cm . As indicated by a time-dependent DFT calculation, electronic excitations from the Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital (HOMO), HOMO-1 and HOMO-2 to the LUMO are the major contributors to this broad band. 

The use of Effective Core Potential operators reduces the computational problem in three ways the primitive basis set can be reduced, the contracted basis set can be reduced and the occupied orbital space can be reduced. The reduction of the occupied orbital space is almost inconsequential in molecular calculations, since it neither affects the number of integrals nor the size of the matrices which has to be diagonalized. The reduction of the primitive basis set is of course more important, but since the integral evaluation time is in general not the bottleneck in molecular calculations, this reduction is still of limited importance. There are some cases where the size of the primitive basis set indeed is important, e.g. in direct SCF procedures. The size of the contracted basis set is very important, however. The bottleneck in normal SCF or Cl calculations is the disc storage and/or the iteration time. Both the disc storage and the iteration time depend strongly on the number of contracted functions. 

It will now be clear that the accuracy that may be attained in crystal analysis depends on the number of observed reflections and on the precision with which their intensities can be measured. (We assume that the structure is not complicated by any randomness or disorder, and that the necessary absorption and extinction corrections can be made.) A very useful discussion of the requirements necessary for determining bond lengths to within a limit of error of 0-01 A has been given by Cruickshank (1960). This is, of course, a very ambitious limit, but if it could be achieved it would enable the predictions of the molecular-orbital and valence-bond theories in aromatic hydrocarbons to be distinguished. It is pointed out that at the 0-1% level of significance a bond length difference must be 3-3 times the standard deviation to be accepted as genuine, so the limit of error of 0-01 A would require an e.s.d. (estimated standard deviation) of 0-003 A or better in the bond difference, or a coordinate e.s.d. of 0-0015 A or better. 

---