Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Orbital time-dependent

The time dependence of the molecular wave function is carried by the wave function parameters, which assume the role of dynamical variables [19,20]. Therefore the choice of parameterization of the wave functions for electronic and nuclear degrees of freedom becomes important. Parameter sets that exhibit continuity and nonredundancy are sought and in this connection the theory of generalized coherent states has proven useful [21]. Typical parameters include molecular orbital coefficients, expansion coefficients of a multiconfigurational wave function, and average nuclear positions and momenta. We write... [Pg.224]

In this minimal END approximation, the electronic basis functions are centered on the average nuclear positions, which are dynamical variables. In the limit of classical nuclei, these are conventional basis functions used in moleculai electronic structure theoiy, and they follow the dynamically changing nuclear positions. As can be seen from the equations of motion discussed above the evolution of the nuclear positions and momenta is governed by Newton-like equations with Hellman-Feynman forces, while the electronic dynamical variables are complex molecular orbital coefficients that follow equations that look like those of the time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) approximation [24]. The coupling terms in the dynamical metric are the well-known nonadiabatic terms due to the fact that the basis moves with the dynamically changing nuclear positions. [Pg.228]

In large systems there can be many orbitals in a small energy range, and the size of the Cl matrix can be very sensitive to the value of the maximum excitation if you use Biergy Criterion. Since calculation time depends heavily on the size of the Cl matrix, you can end up with very long calculations, especially if you use the ab initio methods or the MNDO, AMI, or PM3 semi-empirical methods. This could exhaust the memory of your system. Again, inspecting the results of an RHF (no Cl) calculation will help you avoid these pitfalls. [Pg.40]

This expression is derived as the Fourier transform of a time-dependent one-particle autocorrelation function (26) (i.e. propagator), and cast in matrix form G(co) over a suitable molecular orbital (e.g. HF) basis, by means of the related set of one-electron creation (ai" ") and annihilation (aj) operators. In this equation, the sums over m and p run over all the states of the (N-1)- and (N+l)-electron system, l P > and I P " respectively. Eq and e[ represent the energy of the... [Pg.79]

The field- and time-dependent cluster operator is defined as T t, ) = nd HF) is the SCF wavefunction of the unperturbed molecule. By keeping the Hartree-Fock reference fixed in the presence of the external perturbation, a two step approach, which would introduce into the coupled cluster wavefunction an artificial pole structure form the response of the Hartree Fock orbitals, is circumvented. The quasienergy W and the time-dependent coupled cluster equations are determined by projecting the time-dependent Schrodinger equation onto the Hartree-Fock reference and onto the bra states (HF f[[exp(—T) ... [Pg.115]

Molecular rearrangement resulting from molecular collisions or excitation by light can be described with time-dependent many-electron density operators. The initial density operator can be constructed from the collection of initially (or asymptotically) accessible electronic states, with populations wj. In many cases these states can be chosen as single Slater determinants formed from a set of orthonormal molecular spin orbitals (MSOs) im as / =... [Pg.328]

However, TDSE permits an analysis of the time-dependent population of the molecular orbitals during the tunneling, which is unavailable with the TISE. [Pg.222]

Fig. 2 Electronic conduction of a benzene ring between two conducting electrodes. These calculations are performed by the time-dependent method presented here (solid line) and by the ESQC method (dashed line). The electrodes are connected either in ortho (left column) or meta (right column) position. Two regimes are investigated tunneling with v = —0.25 ev (upper row), pseudoballistic with v = —2 ev (lower row). The vertical dashed lines represent the energy of the benzene s molecular orbitals... Fig. 2 Electronic conduction of a benzene ring between two conducting electrodes. These calculations are performed by the time-dependent method presented here (solid line) and by the ESQC method (dashed line). The electrodes are connected either in ortho (left column) or meta (right column) position. Two regimes are investigated tunneling with v = —0.25 ev (upper row), pseudoballistic with v = —2 ev (lower row). The vertical dashed lines represent the energy of the benzene s molecular orbitals...
The actual form of the Hamiltonian operator hp does not have to be defined at this moment. As in standard perturbation theory, it is assumed that the solution of the electronic structure problem of the combined Hamiltonian HKS +HP can be described as the solution y/(0) of HKS, corrected by a small additional linear-response wavefunction /b//(,). Only these response orbitals will explicitly depend on time - they will follow the oscillations of the external perturbation and adopt its time dependency. Thus, the following Ansatz is made for the solution of the perturbed Hamiltonian HKS +HP ... [Pg.34]

Because of the separation into a time-independent unperturbed wavefunction and a time-dependent perturbation correction, the time derivative on the right-hand side of the time-dependent Kohn-Sham equation will act only on the response orbitals. From this perturbed wavefunction the first-order response density follows as ... [Pg.34]

Time-dependent response theory concerns the response of a system initially in a stationary state, generally taken to be the ground state, to a perturbation turned on slowly, beginning some time in the distant past. The assumption that the perturbation is turned on slowly, i.e. the adiabatic approximation, enables us to consider the perturbation to be of first order. In TD-DFT the density response dp, i.e. the density change which results from the perturbation dveff, enables direct determination of the excitation energies as the poles of the response function dP (the linear response of the KS density matrix in the basis of the unperturbed molecular orbitals) without formally having to calculate a(co). [Pg.121]

The electrons in a molecule s outer orbitals are relatively free to move. If we could compare snapshots of the molecule at two different instants in time then we would see slight differences in the charge distributions, reflecting the changing positions of the electrons in their orbitals. The ease with which the electrons can move with time depends on the molecule s polarizability, which itself measures how easily the electrons can move within their orbitals. [Pg.48]

The second type of time-dependent term, which couples 0> to the band orbitals and is therefore responsible for charge transfer, is... [Pg.340]


See other pages where Orbital time-dependent is mentioned: [Pg.1357]    [Pg.2976]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.150]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.232 , Pg.250 ]




SEARCH



Molecular orbital time-dependent

Time-dependent orbital functional theory (TOFT)

© 2024 chempedia.info