Molecular orbital theory, essentials

The trick is to make two equivalent orbitals in Be out of the atomic orbitals so that each hydrogen will see essentially the same electronic environment. We can accomplish this by mixing the 2s orbital and one of the empty 2p orbitals (say, the 2p ) to form two equivalent orbitals we call sp" hybrids, since they have both s and p characteristics. As with molecular orbital theory, we have to end up with the same number of orbitals we started with. The bonding lobes on the new spa and spb orbitals on Be are 180° apart, just as we need to form BeH2. In this manner, we can mix any type of orbitals we wish to come up with specific bond angles and numbers of equivalent orbitals. The most common combinations are sp, sp, and sp hybrids. In sp hybrids, one and one p orbital are mixed to get two sp orbitals, both of which... 

By referring to the diagrams in Figure 3.1 it may be seen that the orbital <)), transforms as Gg+, and that the orbital < )2 transforms as ou+. That two molecular orbitals are produced from the two atomic orbitals is an important part of molecular orbital theory a law of conservation of orbital numbers- The two molecular orbitals differ in energy, both from each other and from the energy of the atomic level. To understand how this arises it is essential to consider the normalization of the orbitals. 

In the proper development of a scientific theory it is to be expected that theory and experimental observations should be consistent with one another, preferably the theory being refined by further observations. It is essential to obtain experimental observations by which ideas such as molecular orbital theory may be tested and possibly refined. This section describes a method of studying molecules using electromagnetic radiation. 

It is essential to have tools that allow studies of the electronic structure of adsorbates in a molecular orbital picture. In the following, we will demonstrate how we can use X-ray and electron spectroscopies together with Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations to obtain an understanding of the local electronic structure and chemical bonding of adsorbates on metal surfaces. The goal is to use molecular orbital theory and relate the chemical bond formation to perturbations of the orbital structure of the free molecule. This chapter is complementary to Chapter 4, which... 

In molecular orbital theory, there is a clear and well defined path to the exact solution of the Schrodinger equation. All we need do is express our wave function as a Unear combination of all possible configurations (full CI) and choose a basis set that is infinite in size, and we have arrived. While such a goal is essentially never practicable, at least the path to it can be followed unambiguously until computational resources fail. 

Ligand field theory may be taken to be the subject which attempts to rationalize and account for the physical properties of transition metal complexes in fairly simple-minded ways. It ranges from the simplest approach, crystal field theory, where ligands are represented by point charges, through to elementary forms of molecular orbital theory, where at least some attempt at a quantum mechanical treatment is involved. The aims of ligand field theory can be treated as essentially empirical in nature ab initio and even approximate proper quantum mechanical treatments are not considered to be part of the subject, although the simpler empirical methods may be. 

The VSEPR approach is largely restricted to Main Group species (as is Lewis theory). It can be applied to compounds of the transition elements where the nd subshell is either empty or filled, but a partly-filled nd subshell exerts an influence on stereochemistry which can often be interpreted satisfactorily by means of crystal field theory. Even in Main Group chemistry, VSEPR is by no means infallible. It remains, however, the simplest means of rationalising molecular shapes. In the absence of experimental data, it makes a reasonably reliable prediction of molecular geometry, an essential preliminary to a detailed description of bonding within a more elaborate, quantum-mechanical model such as valence bond or molecular orbital theory. 

Correlation of the effect of substituents on the rates of reactions with early transition states often is best accomplished in terms of perturbational molecular orbital theory, and polar effects can play a major role for such reactions [100, 101]. Essentially this theory states that energy differences between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of one reactant and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the other reactant are decisive in determining the reaction rate the smaller the difference in energy, the faster the predicted rate of reaction [102,103]. Since the HOMO of a free radical is the SOMO, the energy difference between the SOMO and the alkene HOMO and/or LUMO is of considerable importance in determining the rates of radical additions to alkenes [84],... 

The current model of bonding in coordination complexes developed gradually between 1930-1950, and has largely superseded the hybridization model discussed previously. It is essentially a simplified adaptation of molecular orbital theory which focuses on the manner in which the electric field due to the unpaired electrons on the ligands interact with the five different d orbitals of the central ion. 

Including tt bonding in molecular orbital theory is essential to understand the nature of bonding in coordination complexes and to account for the trends observed in the spectrochemical series. 

---