Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecular dynamics standard observations

Comparison of Molecular Dynamics with other Methods. In Table I are shown the results of the use of a variety of methods for the calculation of relative and absolute NOE s for the Man(al-3)Nan3 linkage. The values of the relative NOE s derived from the dynamics calculations are in better agreement with experiment than those derived from any other method (for example, the NOE to 3M-H4 is 1.2 s. which is less than two standard deviations from the observed value of 0.7+0.2 s., whereas the next closest value is that from the HSEA surface at 2.0, more than six standard deviations from the observed value). However, the absolute NOE s are overestimated considerably. There are several possible explanations for this... [Pg.276]

By employing a very strong external field, a gedankexperiment may be set up whereby the natural thermal motion of the molecules is put in competition with the aligning effect of the field. This method reveals some properties of the molecular liquid state which are otherwise hidden. In order to explain the observable effects of the applied fields, it is necessary to use equations of motion more generally valid than those of Benoit. These equations may be incorporated within the general structure of reduced model theory " (RMT) and illustrate the use of RMT in the context of liquid-state molecular dynamics. (Elsewhere in this volume RMT is applied to problems in other fields of physics where consideration of stochastic processes is necessary.) In this chapter modifications to the standard methods are described which enable the detailed study of field-on molecular dynamics. [Pg.184]

In the standard versions of HMMs the observables are i.i.d. random variables with stationary distributions that depend on the respective hidden states [13]. Within the scope of molecular dynamics this means, that one considers the simple case where t is comparable to the Tj and Tj -C mins, Tjk, i.e., the process samples the restricted invariant density before exiting from a metastable state, and the sampling time of the time series is long enough to assume statistical independence between steps. Nevertheless, if this is not the case, only a slight modification of the model structure is required to represent the relaxation behavior Instead of i.i.d. random variables one can use an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) process as a model for the output behavior in each hidden state. The HMM then gets the form [11] ... [Pg.506]

None of this can be detected by standard geometric criteria. First-principles simulations like CPMD allow for new wave-function-based descriptors [231] as the electronic structure is - in addition to the positions of all atomic nuclei involved -available on the fly . Of course, the above mentioned fundamental problem that the interaction energy is not an observable quantity is in first-principle simulations as apparent as in static calculations. However, the wavefunction naturally tracks all electronic changes in an aggregate. A wavefunction-based descriptor would also be helpful in traditional molecular dynamics because snapshots can be calculated with advanced static quantum chemical methods. [Pg.451]

It has also been demonstrated that molecular dynamics can play a useful role in the refinement of protein structures against X-ray data.420a By adding an effective potential that represents the difference between the observed and calculated structure factors (Eq. 99) to the standard empirical potential function (Eq. 6), simulated annealing4206 can be used to automatically refine a crude X-ray structure. In this way much of the manual rebuilding of the model structure, that is, the most time-consuming part of standard structure refinement,421 can be avoided. [Pg.199]

This chapter will focus on a simpler version of such a spatially coarse-grained model applied to micellization in binary (surfactant-solvent) systems and to phase behavior in three-component solutions containing an oil phase. The use of simulations for studying solubilization and phase separation in surfactant-oil-water systems is relatively recent, and only limited results are available in the literature. We consider a few major studies from among those available. Although the bulk of this chapter focuses on lattice Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, we begin with some observations based on molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of micellization. In the case of MC simulations, studies of both micellization and microemulsion phase behavior are presented. (Readers unfamiliar with details of Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics methods may consult standard references such as Refs. 5-8 for background.)... [Pg.106]

In order to ascertain whether the 3-regime behavior observed in the experimental vibrational lifetimes is indeed a result of local density enhancements, Goodyear and Tucker [12] computed both vibrational lifetimes and local density enhancements from molecular dynamics simulation for a model solute-solvent SCF solution. These authors considered a diatomic solute in a 2-dimensional supercritical Lennard-Jones fluid of 1150 atoms (Fig. 1). In this model, each of the solute atoms was designated as a Lennard-Jones site, and the Lennard-Jones parameters between solute and solvent atoms were taken to be the same as those between solvent atoms. The vibrational lifetimes were computed using the standard, classical Landau-Teller expression [69,70,72,73,78], i.e. [Pg.407]

Once the Hamiltonian is fully parametrized, standard sampling techniques (e.g. Monte Carlo, molecular dynamics, or dissipative particle dynamics) can be used to explore the phase space and to evaluate macroscopic observables. Note that the coarse-grained hexylthiophenes interact even at a distance of 2[Pg.151]

Chemistry is concerned with the study of molecular structures, equilibria between these structures and the rates with which some stractures are transformed into others. The study of molecular structures corresponds to study of the species that exist at the minima of multidimensional PESs, and which are, in principle, accessible through spectroscopic measurements and X-ray diffraction. The equihbria between these structures are related to the difference in energy between their respective minima, and can be studied by thermochemistry, by assuming an appropriate standard state. The rate of chemical reactions is a manifestation of the energy barriers existing between these minima, barriers that are not directly observable. The transformation between molecular structures implies varying times for the study of chemical reactions, and is the sphere of chemical kinetics. The journey from one minimum to another on the PES is one of the objectives of the study of molecular dynamics, which is included within the domain of chemical kinetics. It is also possible to classify nuclear decay as a special type of unimolecular transformation, and as such, nuclear chemistry can be included as an area of chemical kinetics. Thus, the scope of chemical kinetics spans the area from nuclear processes up to the behaviour of large molecules. [Pg.4]

Strongly non-linear rheology is characteristic of soft matter. In simple fluids, it is difficult to observe any deviations from Newtonian behavior, which is well described by the hydrodynamic equations of motion with linear transport coefficients that depend only on the thermodynamic state. Indeed, Molecular Dynamics simulations [9] have revealed that a hydrodynamic description is valid down to astonishingly small scales, of the order of a few collisions of an individual molecule. This means that one would have to probe the system with very short wave lengths and very high frequencies, which are typically not accessible to standard experiments (with the exception of neutron scattering [10]), and even less in everyday life. However, in soft-matter systems microstructural components (particles and polymers for example) induce responses that depend very much on frequency and length scale. These systems are often referred to as complex fluids. ... [Pg.91]


See other pages where Molecular dynamics standard observations is mentioned: [Pg.536]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.830]    [Pg.859]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.600]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.589]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.1925]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.106]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.237 ]




SEARCH



Standard Observer

© 2024 chempedia.info