Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Moduli, elastic relationships between

Tackifying resins enhance the adhesion of non-polar elastomers by improving wettability, increasing polarity and altering the viscoelastic properties. Dahlquist [31 ] established the first evidence of the modification of the viscoelastic properties of an elastomer by adding resins, and demonstrated that the performance of pressure-sensitive adhesives was related to the creep compliance. Later, Aubrey and Sherriff [32] demonstrated that a relationship between peel strength and viscoelasticity in natural rubber-low molecular resins blends existed. Class and Chu [33] used the dynamic mechanical measurements to demonstrate that compatible resins with an elastomer produced a decrease in the elastic modulus at room temperature and an increase in the tan <5 peak (which indicated the glass transition temperature of the resin-elastomer blend). Resins which are incompatible with an elastomer caused an increase in the elastic modulus at room temperature and showed two distinct maxima in the tan <5 curve. [Pg.620]

In the region where the relationship between stress and strain is linear, the material is said to be elastic, and the constant of proportionality is E, Young s modulus, or the elastic modulus. [Pg.186]

Analysis of the relationships between the moduli and bond strength between particles [222] has shown that for Vf = 0.1 — 0.15 the concentration dependence of the modulus corresponds to the lower curve in the Hashin-Shtrikman equation [223] (hard inclusion in elastic matrix), and for Vf — 0.34 to the upper boundary (elastic inclusion in a hard matrix). The 0.1 to 0.34 range is the phase inversion region. [Pg.32]

Here E is Young modulus. Comparison with Equation (3.95) clearly shows that the parameter k, usually called spring stiffness, is inversely proportional to its length. Sometimes k is also called the elastic constant but it may easily cause confusion because of its dependence on length. By definition, Hooke s law is valid when there is a linear relationship between the stress and the strain. Equation (3.97). For instance, if /q = 0.1 m then an extension (/ — /q) cannot usually exceed 1 mm. After this introduction let us write down the condition when all elements of the system mass-spring are at the rest (equilibrium) ... [Pg.189]

Most engineering materials, particularly metals, follow Hooke s law by which it is meant that they exhibit a linear relationship between elastic stress and strain. This linear relationship can be expressed as o = E where E is known as the modulus of elasticity. The value of E, which is given by the slope of the stress-strain plot, is a characteristic of the material being considered and changes from material to material. [Pg.12]

Both the Einstein and Debye theories show a clear relationship between apparently unrelated properties heat capacity and elastic properties. The Einstein temperature for copper is 244 K and corresponds to a vibrational frequency of 32 THz. Assuming that the elastic properties are due to the sum of the forces acting between two atoms this frequency can be calculated from the Young s modulus of copper, E = 13 x 1010 N m-2. The force constant K is obtained by dividing E by the number of atoms in a plane per m2 and by the distance between two neighbouring planes of atoms. K thus obtained is 14.4 N m-1 and the Einstein frequency, obtained using the mass of a copper atom into account, 18 THz, is in reasonable agreement with that deduced from the calorimetric Einstein temperature. [Pg.244]

Ultimate strength for concrete is greater under dynamic loads. Though the modulus of elasticity is also greater, this difference is small and is usually ignored. Figure 5.6 describes the relationship between dynamic and static response for... [Pg.31]

The tensile modulus can be determined from the slope of the linear portion of this stress-strain curve. If the relationship between stress and strain is linear to the yield point, where deformation continues without an increased load, the modulus of elasticity can be calculated by dividing the yield strength (pascals) by the elongation to yield ... [Pg.451]

Now, in rheological terminology, our compressibility JT, is our bulk compliance and the bulk elastic modulus K = 1 /Jr- This is not a surprise of course, as the difference in the heat capacities is the rate of change of the pV term with temperature, and pressure is the bulk stress and the relative volume change, the bulk strain. Immediately we can see the relationship between the thermodynamic and rheological expressions. If, for example, we use the equation of state for a perfect gas, substituting pV = RTinto a = /V(dV/dT)p yields a = R/pV = /Tand so for our perfect gas ... [Pg.20]

The phase angle changes with frequency and this is shown in Figure 4.7. As the frequency increases the sample becomes more elastic. Thus the phase difference between the stress and the strain reduces. There is an important feature that we can obtain from the dynamic response of a viscoelastic model and that is the dynamic viscosity. In oscillatory flow there is an analogue to the viscosity measured in continuous shear flow. We can illustrate this by considering the relationship between the stress and the strain. This defines the complex modulus ... [Pg.111]

The relationship between the compressive strength and the modulus of elasticity for a number of similar concretes is shown in Fig. 3.29 [35] and Fig. 3.30 [33]. Again it is clear that the presence of entrained air does not alter the normal relationship. [Pg.211]

Fig. 3.29 The relationship between the compressive strength and modulus of elasticity of plain and air-... Fig. 3.29 The relationship between the compressive strength and modulus of elasticity of plain and air-...
Figure 1.4 Schematic representation of the relationship between the shape of the potential energy well and selected physical properties. Materials with a deep well (a) have a high melting point, high elastic modulus, and low thermal expansion coefficient. Those with a shallow well (b) have a low melting point, low elastic modulus, and high thermal expansion coefficient. Adapted from C. R. Barrett, W. D. Nix, and A. S. Tetelman, The Principles of Engineering Materials. Copyright 1973 by Prentice-Hall, Inc. Figure 1.4 Schematic representation of the relationship between the shape of the potential energy well and selected physical properties. Materials with a deep well (a) have a high melting point, high elastic modulus, and low thermal expansion coefficient. Those with a shallow well (b) have a low melting point, low elastic modulus, and high thermal expansion coefficient. Adapted from C. R. Barrett, W. D. Nix, and A. S. Tetelman, The Principles of Engineering Materials. Copyright 1973 by Prentice-Hall, Inc.
The thus obtained high-density Mn-Zn ferrite was investigated in detail from the view of physical and mechanical properties, that is, the relationships between the composition of metals (a,) ) and <5 the magnetic properties such as temperature and frequency dependence of initial permeability, magnetic hysteresis loss and disaccommodation and the mechanical properties such as modulus of elasticity, hardness, strength, and workability. Figures 3.13(a) and (b) show the optical micrographs of the samples prepared by the processes depicted in Fig. 3.12(a) and (b), respectively. The density of the sample shown in Fig. 3.13(a) reached up to 99.8 per cent of the theoretical value, whereas the sample shown in Fig. 3.13(b) which was prepared without a densification process, has many voids. [Pg.217]

The above experimental results as expressed in Eqs. (11) and (12), together with our experimental results Eq. (8), confirm the relationship between the collective diffusion coefficient, the elastic modulus, and the friction coefficient which is given in the Eq. (2). [Pg.39]

Stress/strain relationships are commonly studied in tension, compression, shear or indentation. Because in theory all stress/strain relationships except those at breaking point are a function of elastic modulus, it can be questioned as to why so many modes of test are required. The answer is partly because some tests have persisted by tradition, partly because certain tests are very convenient for particular geometry of specimens and partly because at high strains the physics of rubber elasticity is even now not fully understood so that exact relationships between the various moduli are not known. A practical extension of the third reason is that it is logical to test using the mode of deformation to be found in practice. [Pg.110]

Fig. 9.8. Relationship between scratching hardness and modulus of elasticity. (After Decneut, 1967)... Fig. 9.8. Relationship between scratching hardness and modulus of elasticity. (After Decneut, 1967)...

See other pages where Moduli, elastic relationships between is mentioned: [Pg.369]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.158]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.165 ]




SEARCH



Elasticity modulus

© 2024 chempedia.info