Modeling drinking water

Da Two columns, residence Model drinking-water High (42.9) Ribas et al. (1995)... 

Clewell, H. J. I., and Andersen, M. E. (1987). Dose, species and route extrapolation using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models. Drinking Water and Health 8, 159-182. 

FIGURE 3. Dynamics of biofilm formation on polypropylene in a model drinking water supply system under flow velocities 0.3 m/s 0.5 m/s 0.7 m/s and 1 m/s. 

Figure S.8 Typical concentration profiles for nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia (Q and during hydrogenation of a model drinking water at two different hydrogen pressures over a bimetallic Pdf 1 %)-Cu(0.3 %)/Al2 O3 catalyst...

Monte Carlo simulation, an iterative technique which derives a range of risk estimates, was incorporated into a trichloroethylene risk assessment using the PBPK model developed by Fisher and Allen (1993). The results of this study (Cronin et al. 1995), which used the kinetics of TCA production and trichloroethylene elimination as the dose metrics relevant to carcinogenic risk, indicated that concentrations of 0.09-1.0 pg/L (men) and 0.29-5.3 pg/L (women) in drinking water correspond to a cancer risk in humans of 1 in 1 million. For inhalation exposure, a similar risk was obtained from intermittent exposure to 0.07-13.3 ppb (men) and 0.16-6.3 ppb (women), or continuous exposure to 0.01-2.6 ppb (men) and 0.03-6.3 ppb (women) (Cronin et al. 1995). 

In Fig. 42.9 we show the simulation results obtained by Janse [8] for a municipal laboratory for the quality assurance of drinking water. Simulated delays are in good agreement with the real delays in the laboratory. Unfortunately, the development of this simulation model took several man years which is prohibitive for a widespread application. Therefore one needs a simulator (or empty shell) with predefined objects and rules by which a laboratory manager would be capable to develop a specific model of his laboratory. Ideally such a simulator should be linked to or be integrated with the laboratory information management system in order to extract directly the attribute values. 

A model calculation showed that the HiPOx system may have been fully successful in limiting bromate formation under the chosen oxidant doses if the influent bromide concentration was 0.56 mg/L or less. Since a bromide concentration of 0.56 mg/L is still extremely high for a drinking water source, the HiPOx system appears to hold promise for destroying MTBE and its oxidative by-product TBA while controlling bromate formation, even in waters that have high bromide concentrations.101... 

O Flaherty EJ. 1987. Modeling An introduction. In Pharmacokinetics in risk assessment Drinking water and health, vol 8. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. National Academy Press, 27-3. 

Cifffoy P, Tanaka T, Johansson E, Brochot C (2011) Linking fate model in freshwater and PBPK model to assess human internal dosimetry of B(a)P associated with drinking water. Environ Geochem Health 33 371-387... 

Food and water ingestion (dietary exposition). To assess the dietary exposure, ingestion rates of the different food products and water are needed. Multimedia fate models or food sampling campaigns are the main ways to determine the concentration of substances in food products and water at the specific scenario. These models consider cattle, meat, milk, fish, crops, and drinking water, among others. 

Meranger, J.C., Gladwell, D.R., Lett, R.E. 1986. Application of a conceptual model to assessing the impact of acid rain on drinking water quality. WHO Water Quality Bulletin, 11, 179-186. 

Physiochemical properties of the test material should be a major consideration in selection of drinking water as a dosing matrix. Unlike diet preparation or preparation of gavage dose solutions and suspensions where a variety of solvents and physical processes can be utilized to prepare a dosable form, preparations of drinking water solutions are less flexible. Water solubility of the test chemical is the major governing factor and is dependent on factors such as pH, dissolved salts, and temperature. The animal model itself sets limitations for these factors (acceptability and suitability of pH and salt-adjusted water by the animals as well as animal environmental specifications such as room temperature). 

More sophisticated probabilistic models are used by EPA to comply with the aggregate and cumulative risk provisions of the FQPA. These models consider rolling windows of exposure, toxicological equivalence factors for pesticides that have common toxicological mechanisms, and include methods to incorporate exposure from drinking water and residential pesticide use into the pesticide exposure estimates. 

Most scientists would hold that these unknowns and uncertainties in the regulatory risk-assessment model would tend to favor risk overestimation rather than underestimation or accurate prediction. While this view seems correct, it must be admitted that there is no epidemiological method available to test the hypothesis of an extra lifetime cancer risk of about 10 per 1000 000 from methylene chloride in drinking water. The same conclusion holds for most environmental carcinogens. It is also the case that more uncertainties attend the risk assessment process than we have indicated above. 

---