Modeling, computational aspects,

When the simulation of deep-well temperatures, pressures, and salinities is imposed as a condition, the number of codes that may be of value is reduced to a much smaller number. Nordstrom and Ball121 recommend six references as covering virtually all the mathematical, thermodynamic, and computational aspects of chemical-equilibrium formulations (see references 123-128). Recent references on modeling include references 45, 63, 70, 129, and 130. 

Theory and computational aspects of intestinal permeability have been reviewed in detail by Egan and Lauri [27], Briefly, a drug must be somewhat permeable through the membrane of the intestinal tract if it is to be administered orally and achieve systemic exposure. The rate of membrane permeability is strongly related to the lipophilicity and hydrophilicity of the molecule. Thus, models with a small number of descriptors related to those two properties can provide useful predictions of drug absorption. 

The focus of the next four chapters (Chapters 14-17) is mainly on the theoretical/computational aspects. Chapter 14 by T. S. Sorensen and E. C. F. Yang examines the involvement of p-hydrido cation intermediates in the context of the industrially important heptane to toluene dehydrocyclization process. Chapter 15 by P. M. Esteves et al. is devoted to theoretical studies of carbonium ions. Chapter 16 by G. L. Borosky and K. K. Laali presents a computational study on aza-PAH carbocations as models for the oxidized metabolites of Aza-PAHs. Chapter 17 by S. C. Ammal and H. Yamataka examines the borderline Beckmann rearrangement-fragmentation mechanism and explores the influence of carbocation stability on the reaction mechanism. 

Hall LH (1990) In Rouvray DH (ed) Computational aspects of molecular connectivity and its role in structure-property modeling computational chemical graph theory. Nova Science Publishers, New York, NY, chap 8, p 202... 

The Human Genome Project went three-dimensional in late 2000. Structural genomics efforts will determine the structures of thousands of new proteins over the next decade. These initiatives seek to streamline and automate every experimental and computational aspect of the structural determination pipeline, with most of the steps involved covered in previous chapters of this volume. At the end of the pipeline, an atomic model is built and iteratively refined to best fit the observed data. The final atomic model, after careful analysis, is deposited in the Protein Data Bank, or PDB (Berman et ah, 2000). About 25,000 unique protein sequences are currently in the PDB. High-throughput and conventional methods will dramatically increase this number and it is crucial that these new structures be of the highest quality (Chandonia and Brenner, 2006). 

The quote by Schleyer that computational chemistry is to model all aspects of chemistry by calculation rather than experiment tells us that practically every mechanistic question can be tackled by computational methods. This is true in principle, but it says nothing about the quality of the computed numbers, and Coulson said, Give us insights, not numbers , which emphasises this point and relates to the fact that it is easy- fortune or curse - to compute numbers. This chapter presents some guidelines regarding the value and the interpretation of the numbers when it comes to elucidating reaction mechanisms with computational chemistry approaches. 

The last aspect we stress is the flexibility of the method. Simplified versions are abundant, and they have an important role in computational chemistry, but in this chapter we consider extensions and refinements which introduce in the model other aspects of the physics of solvation. 

To this end, the presentation of the various contributions follows a step-by-step scheme in which the physical bases of the models come first followed by an analysis of both mathematical and computational aspects and finally by a review of their applications to different physical-chemical problems. For all the parts of the book two reading levels will thus be possible one, more introductory, on the given theoretical issue or on the given application, and the other, more detailed (and more technical), on specific physical and numerical aspects involved in each issue and/or application. In such a way, the reader will first be introduced to a given subject through a general description of the problem (with more emphasis on those aspects which are more directly related to the presence of the solvent), and then she/he will discover how continuum models can be extended and generalized to properly describe such a problem. In parallel, possible limitations or incompleteness of these models are pointed out with indications of future developments. 

Huber, M.T., Braun, H.A., Voigt, K., and Krieg, J.C. Some computational aspects of the kindling model for neuropsychiatric disorders. Neurocomputing 2001, 38 1297-1306. 

In numerical work and use of computers, the critical difficulty is in determining whether or not we have the right model. That can only be assessed through a comparison with experiments. That means we have to do the experiments or look for somebody else to do them, and the latter rarely occurs. Our ability to compute has outrun our ability to run critical tests to see whether or not the model is valid. If our measurements don t agree with the computations, then we ve made a breakthrough or something is wrong with the model. That aspect needs more attention. 

The complexity of viscoelastic flows requires a multidisciplinary approach including modelling, computational and mathematical aspects. In this chapter we will restrict ourselves to the latter and briefly review the state of the art on the most basic mathematical questions that can be raised on differential models of viscoelastic fluids. We want to emphasize the intimate connections that exist between the theoretical issues discussed here and the modelling of complex polymer flows (see Part III) and their numerical simulations (see Chapter II.3). 

Hall, L.H. (1990). Computational Aspects of Molecular Connectivity and its Role in Structure-Property Modeling. In Computational Chemical Graph Theory (Rouvray, D.H., ed.). Nova Press, New York (NY), pp. 202-233. 

Before entering in a more detailed description of the computational aspects of the model, we report a concise outline of the most important ways according to which one may use G(R) values in the study of chemical reactions. 

When the external electric field is time-dependent, there is no well-defined energy of the molecular system in accordance with Eq. (100), and the wave function response can thus not be retrieved from a variational condition on the energy as in the analytic derivative approach described above. Instead the response parameters have to be determined from the time-dependent Schrodinger equation, a procedure which was illustrated in Section 3 for the exact state case. In approximate state theories, however, our wave function space only partially spans the 7V-electron Hilbert space, and the response functions that correspond to an approximate state wave function will clearly be separate from those of the exact state wave function. This fact is disregarded in the sum-over-states approach, and, apart from the computational aspect of slowly converging SOS expressions, it is of little concern when highly accurate wave function models are used. But for less flexible wave function models, the correct response functions should be used in the calculation of nonlinear optical properties. 

In a recent study, students manipulation of physical models was compared to their use of a technology-mediated modeling tool called Chemation [13]. The computer visuaUzation tool described in the study helped students to model dynamic aspects of microscopic representations, since it allowed a build-up of frame-by-frame animations. Students had access to a palette of 21 atoms they could manipulate electronically. Sections of the curriculum that were studied included properties of substances, pure substances and mixtures, chemical reactions. 

Computational aspects, including advantages and disadvantages, of the solution of the chemical reaction equilibrium model formulation are discussed by Michelsen and Mollerup [12]. In particular, readers not familiar with the theory for constrained optimization can find a short introduction therein. A more extensive discussion of practical methods of optimization can be found in the book of Fletcher [5]. 

---