Modeling advanced solution methods

The most obvious defect of the Thomas-Fermi model is the neglect of interaction between electrons, but even in the most advanced modern methods this interaction still presents the most difficult problem. The most useful practical procedure to calculate the electronic structure of complex atoms is by means of the Hartree-Fock procedure, which is not by solution of the atomic wave equation, but by iterative numerical procedures, based on the hydrogen model. In this method the exact Hamiltonian is replaced by... 

Despite advances in MILP solution methods, problem size is still a major issue since scheduling problems are known to be NP-hard (i.e., exponential increase of computation time with size in worst case). While effective modeling can help to overcome to some extent the issue of computational efficiency, special solution strategies such as decomposition and aggregation are needed in order to address the ever increasing sizes of real-world problems. 

Another detailed method of determining pressures is computational fluid dynamics (CFD), which uses a numerical solution of simplified equations of motion over a dense grid of points around the building. Murakami et al. and Zhoy and Stathopoulos found less agreement with computational fluid dynamics methods using the k-e turbulence model typically used in current commercial codes. More advanced turbulence models such as large eddy simulation were more successful but much more costly. ... 

Much effort has been expended on models that can be used to predict the solubility behavior of solutes, with good success being attained using a semi-empirical, group contribution approach [75]. In this system, the contributions made by individual functional groups are summed to yield a composite for the molecule, which implies a summation of free energy contributions from constituents. This method has proven to be useful in the prediction of solubility in water and in water-cosolvent mixtures. In addition to the simplest methodology, a variety of more sophisticated approaches to the prediction of compound solubility have been advanced [68]. 

More advanced mathematical aspects of the graph-theoretical models for aromaticity are given in other references [36, 48, 49]. Some alternative methods, beyond the scope of this chapter, for the study of aromaticity in deltahedral molecules include tensor surface harmonic theory [51-53] and the topological solutions of non-linear field theory related to the Skyrmions of nuclear physics [54]. 

---