Model of a Water Molecule

The chemical formula for a water molecule is H20. Using the atomic model kit, construct a model of a water molecule. Use toothpicks to hold the atoms together. Have your teacher check your model to see if it is correct. 

Scientists use models to represent molecules. The models are made from small balls with the balls representing atoms. These models allow scientists to understand more about molecules. Models of a water molecule, a carbon dioxide molecule, an oxygen molecule, and a methane molecule are shown below. You can make similiar models with marshmallows or gumdrops held together by toothpicks. Each marshmallow or gumdrop can represent one atom. 

Fig. 22 A and B. Electron-domain models of a water molecule sharing with a metal cation (solid circle) (A) one and (B) two electron pairs...

Figure 1,4. Model of a water molecule. The curved lines represent borders at which van der Waals attractions are counterbalanced by repulsive forces (after Hillel, 1980, with permission).

Figure 1. Scheme of the arrangement of the cations LT, K, and Cs" at Sji sites (hatched circles) and Sm sites (filled circles). The other prolection of that part of the lattice of the KX zeolite containing a six-membered oxygen ring as well as a model of a water molecule are also shown on the same scale... 

How would you build a gumdrop model of a water molecule First, you would draw the electron dot diagram. Remember that the dot diagram models the arrangement of valence electrons in the molecule in two dimensions. The electron dot diagram for a water molecule shows that each hydrogen shares a pair of electrons with the oxygen. 

In this gumdrop model of a water molecule, you can see that the three atoms form a bent structure. ... 

FIGURE 3.2 Structure of water, (a) Model of a water molecule. The distance between the nuclei of O and H is l 0.1 nm, the net charges q are 0.24 times the charge of an electron, and the bond angles 6 are 109°. After Israelachvilli (see Bibliography), (b) Example of how water molecules form H-bonds with one another schematic and not to scale. (After O. R. Fennema. Food Chemistry, 3d ed. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996 (Chapter 2). 

Figure 1. Schematic diagrams of (a) 3-point, (b) 4-point, and (c) 5-point models of a water molecule.

TIk experimentally determined dipole moment of a water molecule in the gas phase is 1.85 D. The dipole moment of an individual water molecule calculated with any of thv se simple models is significantly higher for example, the SPC dipole moment is 2.27 D and that for TIP4P is 2.18 D. These values are much closer to the effective dipole moment of liquid water, which is approximately 2.6 D. These models are thus all effective pairwise models. The simple water models are usually parametrised by calculating various pmperties using molecular dynamics or Monte Carlo simulations and then modifying the... 

Recently, Engel et al.92 critically discussed these models and concluded by equilibrium measurements in different solvents that bridging of the hydroxy group of hydroxyproline by means of a water molecule must be an unspecific reaction and can be caused as... 

An ab initio MO calculation by Jorgensen revealed enhanced hydrogen bonding of a water molecule to the transition states for the Diels-Alder reactions of cyclopentadiene with methyl vinyl ketone and acrylonitrile, which indicates that the observed rate accelerations for Diels-Alder reactions in aqueous solution arise from the hydrogenbonding effect in addition to a relatively constant hydrophobic term.7,76 Ab initio calculation using a self-consistent reaction field continuum model shows that electronic and nuclear polarization effects in solution are crucial to explain the stereoselectivity of nonsymmetrical... 

With the addition of a pseudopotential interaction between electrons and metal ions, the density-functional approach has been used82 to calculate the effect of the solvent of the electrolyte phase on the potential difference across the surface of a liquid metal. The solvent is modeled as a repulsive barrier or as a region of dielectric constant greater than unity or both. Assuming no specific adsorption, the metal is supposed to be in contact with a monolayer of water, modeled as a region of 3-A thickness (diameter of a water molecule) in which the dielectric constant is 6 (high-frequency value, appropriate for nonorientable dipoles). Beyond this monolayer, the dielectric constant is assumed to take on the bulk liquid value of 78, although the calculations showed that the dielectric constant outside of the monolayer had only a small effect on the electronic profile. 

This effect of the position of the lone pair is relevant not only in the case of phthalocyaninato ligands, but also can be a clue to the intriguing behaviour of the [Dy(DOTA)] complex, where the rotation of a water molecule changes the magnetic properties [13]. A PCE or an REC model cannot account for the effect of such a rotation, but an LPEC model would predict a dramatic effect, since the change in the position of the lone pair effectively means a completely different geometry. 

Various approaches have been used to model the interaction between the metal electrode and the water molecules. They range from simple Lennard-Jones or Morse potentials, which have been adjusted to give good values for experimental porperties like the energy of adsorption of a water molecule, to potentials derived from ab initio calculations performed for a cluster of metal atoms and one water molecule. 

Two cell models of water have been reported. Weissman and Blum 63> considered the motion of a water molecule in a cell generated by an expanded but perfect ice lattice. Weres and Rice 64> developed a much more detailed model, based on a more sophisticated description of the cell and a good, nonparametric water-water interaction namely the Ben-Naim-Stillinger potential 60>. The major features of the WR model are the following ... 

One of the important electrochemical interfaces is that between water and liquid mercury. The potential energy functions for modeling liquid metals are, in general, more complex than those suitable for modeling sohds or simple molecular liquids, because the electronic structure of the metal plays an important role in the determination of its structure." However, based on the X-ray structure of liquid mercury, which shows a similarity with the solid a-mercury structure, Heinzinger and co-workers presented a water/Hg potential that is similar in form to the water/Pt potential described earlier. This potential was based on quantum mechanical calculations of the adsorption of a water molecule on a cluster of mercury atoms. ... 

---