Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Nuclear polarization effect

An ab initio MO calculation by Jorgensen revealed enhanced hydrogen bonding of a water molecule to the transition states for the Diels-Alder reactions of cyclopentadiene with methyl vinyl ketone and acrylonitrile, which indicates that the observed rate accelerations for Diels-Alder reactions in aqueous solution arise from the hydrogenbonding effect in addition to a relatively constant hydrophobic term.7,76 Ab initio calculation using a self-consistent reaction field continuum model shows that electronic and nuclear polarization effects in solution are crucial to explain the stereoselectivity of nonsymmetrical... [Pg.391]

Chemically Induced Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Effects. 132... [Pg.121]

Table 5. Lamb shift contribution for the ground state of 208Pb81+ i0n (in eV). The notations are the same as in Table 4. The finite nuclear size correction is calculated for a Fermi distribution with (r2 1,/2 = 5.505 0.001 fm. The SESE (a) (irred) correction is obtained by an interpolation from the known values for Z = 70, 80,92. The inaccuracy of the Uehling approximation for VPVP (f) and S(VP)E corrections is neglected. The zero value presented for the nuclear polarization is due to the cancellation of the usual nuclear polarization [35] with the mixed nuclear polarization (NP)-vacuum polarization correction [36]. The latter effect arises when the nucleus interacts with a virtual electron-positron pair. For lead, due to the collective monopole vibrations, specific for this nucleus, mixed NP-VP effect becomes rather large. Therefore, the nuclear polarization effects which otherwise limit very precise Lamb shift predictions are almost completely negligible for 208Pb, making this ion especially suitable for the most precise theoretical predictions... Table 5. Lamb shift contribution for the ground state of 208Pb81+ i0n (in eV). The notations are the same as in Table 4. The finite nuclear size correction is calculated for a Fermi distribution with (r2 1,/2 = 5.505 0.001 fm. The SESE (a) (irred) correction is obtained by an interpolation from the known values for Z = 70, 80,92. The inaccuracy of the Uehling approximation for VPVP (f) and S(VP)E corrections is neglected. The zero value presented for the nuclear polarization is due to the cancellation of the usual nuclear polarization [35] with the mixed nuclear polarization (NP)-vacuum polarization correction [36]. The latter effect arises when the nucleus interacts with a virtual electron-positron pair. For lead, due to the collective monopole vibrations, specific for this nucleus, mixed NP-VP effect becomes rather large. Therefore, the nuclear polarization effects which otherwise limit very precise Lamb shift predictions are almost completely negligible for 208Pb, making this ion especially suitable for the most precise theoretical predictions...
The first discovery of chemically induced dynamic electron polarization (CIDEP) was made by Fessenden and Schuler in 1963 (58). These authors observed the abnormal spectra of the H atoms produced during the irradiation of liquid methane. The low-field line in the esr spectrum was inverted compared to the corresponding high-field line. The related chemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization effect (CIDNP) was reported independently four years later by Bargon et al. (22) and by Ward and Lawler (134). Because of the wider application of nmr in chemistry, the CIDNP effect immediately attracted considerable theoretical and experimental attention, and an elegant theory based on a radical-pair model (RPM) was advanced to explain the effect. The remarkable development of the radical-pair theory has obviously brought cross-fertilization to the then-lesser-known CIDEP phenomenon. [Pg.284]

In 1969, Jemison and Morris followed the Stevens rearrangement of A, iV-dimethyl-4-nitrobenzylamine acetamide by NMR and noted a chemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization effect on benzylic protons consistent with a benzyl radical. They postulated that this Stevens-type rearrangement of a benzyl group from an ammonium center to a negatively-charged nitrogen center occurred via a homolytic dissociation... [Pg.2423]

Nuclear polarization effects on the rate of enzymatic reactions contributes significantly to the investigation of the kinetics and mechanism of electron transfer processes in catalytic systems. [Pg.428]

Carver TR, Slichter CP (1956) Experimental verification of the Overhauser nuclear polarization effect. Phys Rev 102 975-980... [Pg.200]


See other pages where Nuclear polarization effect is mentioned: [Pg.336]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.592]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.634]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.206]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.206 ]




SEARCH



Cross-Polarization Origin of the Nuclear Overhauser Effect

Dynamic nuclear polarization effects

Nuclear effective

Nuclear effects

Nuclear polarization

Polar effect

Polarity, effect

Polarization Transfer and the Nuclear Overhauser Effect

Polarization effects

Spin polarization induced nuclear Overhauser effect

© 2024 chempedia.info