Model Hamiltonian theory

Most microscopic theories of adsorption and desorption are based on the lattice gas model. One assumes that the surface of a sohd can be divided into two-dimensional cells, labelled i, for which one introduces microscopic variables Hi = 1 or 0, depending on whether cell i is occupied by an adsorbed gas particle or not. (The connection with magnetic systems is made by a transformation to spin variables cr, = 2n, — 1.) In its simplest form a lattice gas model is restricted to the submonolayer regime and to gas-solid systems in which the surface structure and the adsorption sites do not change as a function of coverage. To introduce the dynamics of the system one writes down a model Hamiltonian which, for the simplest system of a one-component adsorbate with one adsorption site per unit cell, is... 

A spin-gas microscopic theory has been pursued by Berker et al. [32] to explain the multiplicity of smectic ordering and the re-entrance phenomenon in strongly polar mesogens. They have used a model Hamiltonian of the form... 

Calculating the exact response of a semiconductor heterostructure to an ultrafast laser pulse poses a daunting challenge. Fortunately, several approximate methods have been developed that encompass most of the dominant physical effects. In this work a model Hamiltonian approach is adopted to make contact with previous advances in quantum control theory. This method can be systematically improved to obtain agreement with existing experimental results. One of the main goals of this research is to evaluate the validity of the model, and to discover the conditions under which it can be reliably applied. 

In this chapter, we wiU review electrochemical electron transfer theory on metal electrodes, starting from the theories of Marcus [1956] and Hush [1958] and ending with the catalysis of bond-breaking reactions. On this route, we will explore the relation to ion transfer reactions, and also cover the earlier models for noncatalytic bond breaking. Obviously, this will be a tour de force, and many interesting side-issues win be left unexplored. However, we hope that the unifying view that we present, based on a framework of model Hamiltonians, will clarify the various aspects of this most important class of electrochemical reactions. 

The authors [33] have elucidated the linear dependence of Ao0 (z-dep) on E for the polyanions by a quantum chemical consideration. A model Hamiltonian approach to the charge transfer (CT) interaction between a polyanion and solvents has been made on the basis of the Mulliken s CT complex theory [34]. 

The fundamental object in the quantum theory of matter is the wave function, which is the most compact way to represent all the information contained in a system. Exact wave functions are usually not available, so if we want to know certain properties of the system the procedure is to set up some model Hamiltonian and get an approximate wave function, from which the desired properties can be extracted. This program can be represented by... 

The reason for pursuing the reverse program is simply to condense the observed properties into some manageable format consistent with quantum theory. In favourable cases, the model Hamiltonian and wave functions can be used to reliably predict related properties which were not observed. For spectroscopic experiments, the properties that are available are the energies of many different wave functions. One is not so interested in the wave functions themselves, but in the eigenvalue spectrum of the fitted model Hamiltonian. On the other hand, diffraction experiments offer information about the density of a particular property in some coordinate space for one single wave function. In this case, the interest is not so much in the model Hamiltonian, but in the fitted wave function itself. 

Many theories of adatom-adatom interactions and other interactions are based on a model Hamiltonian developed by Anderson for dilute alloys. Such a Hamiltonian may also be used to explain adatom-impurity atom interactions. 

In this review we shall first establish the theoretical foundations of the semi-classical theory that eventually lead to the formulation of the Breit-Pauli Hamiltonian. The latter is an approximation suited to make the connection to phenomenological model Hamiltonians like the Heisenberg Hamiltonian for the description of electronic spin-spin interactions. The complete derivations have been given in detail in Ref. (21), but turn out to be very involved and are thus scattered over many pages in Ref. (21). For this reason, we aim here at a summary that is as brief and concise as possible so that all relevant connections between different levels of approximation are evident. This allows us to connect present-day quantum chemical methods to phenomenological Hamiltonians and hence to establish and review the current status of these first-principles methods applied to transition-metal clusters. 

Each of the semi-classical trajectory surface hopping and quantum wave packet dynamics simulations has its pros and cons. For the semi-classical trajectory surface hopping, the lack of coherence and phase of the nuclei, and total time per trajectory are cons whereas inclusion of all nuclear degrees of freedom, the use of potentials direct from electronic structure theory, the ease of increasing accuracy by running more trajectories, and the ease of visualization of results are pros. For the quantum wave packet dynamics, the complexity of setting up an appropriate model Hamiltonian, use of approximate fitted potentials, and the... 

The theoretical difficulty of making this separation derives from the indistinguish-ability of electrons and the requirement that the total wavefunction be antisymmetric with respect to permutations of the electronic co-ordinates. One approach has been to abandon a full quantum mechanical description in favour of a simplified model hamiltonian which can be conveniently parameterized in terms of experimental quantities. This is the rationale behind Huckel theory, CNDO, and other more sophisticated methods such as MINDO. These techniques have been well documented and reviewed elsewhere (Dewar,1 Pariser, Parr, and Pople,2 Murrell and Hargett,3 etc.) and will not be pursued further here. 

The above approaches estimate the excitation rate by using either second-order perturbation theory [6] or a re-summation to all orders in perturbation theory [20,21]. In order to be able to sum the infinite series of perturbation theory references [20,21], we use an orthogonal basis-set of the model Hamiltonian (2) (the creation and destruction operators need to... 

The delocalized state can be considered to be a transition state, and transition state theory [105], a well-known methodology for the calculation of the kinetics of events, [12,88,106-108] can be applied. In the present model description of diffusion in a zeolite, the transition state methodology for the calculation of the self-diffusion coefficient of molecules in zeolites with linear channels and different dimensionalities of the channel system is applied [88], The transition state, defined by the delocalized state of movement of molecules adsorbed in zeolites, is established during the solution of the equation of motion of molecules whose adsorption is described by a model Hamiltonian, which describes the zeolite as a three-dimensional array of N identical cells, each containing N0 identical sites [104], This result is very interesting, since adsorption and diffusion states in zeolites have been noticed [88],... 

To cover the gap between them the Hubbard model Hamiltonian was quite generally accepted. This Hamiltonian apparently has the ability of mimicking the whole spectrum, from the free quasi-particle domain, at U=0, to the strongly correlated one, at U —> oo, where, for half-filled band systems, it renormalizes to the Heisenberg Hamiltonian, via Degenerate Perturbation Theory. Thence, the Heisenberg Hamiltonian was assumed to be acceptable only for rather small t/U values. 

---