Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mixing process model assumptions

Infinitely Fast Reaction In this representation, one or more chemical reactions are specified, but they are assumed be infinitely fast. In modeling of combustion processes, this approach is known in terms of the mixed is burned assumption. Typically this approach involves one-step description, where reactants are converted directly to final products. An example is the one-step oxidation of a hydrocarbon fuel,... [Pg.543]

Numerous studies suggest that the relative proportion of calcium derived from the watershed compared to the calcium derived from atmospheric inputs can be inferred by using strontium isotope data. The strontium isotope ratios for the bedrock, atmospheric input, and output are combined in a linear mixing model to infer the ultimate sources of calcium (bedrock/soil complex versus atmosphere). The explicit assumption in this technique is that calcium and strontium behave similarly during all biogeochemical processes. The assumption has been challenged by Bullen et al. (2002). [Pg.4917]

The measuring system developed was successfully applied within various secondary combustion chambers (SCC) of biomass furnaces to determine important process parameters. With certain model assumptions for the reactor dynamics, the degree of mixing and the mean residence time are calculated from the measured residence time distribution (RTD). The determination of the fluctuating process parameters is possible with a time resolution of 15 seconds. [Pg.583]

Two-component, catalyzed, interfacial polymerization of polyurethane has been previously modeled by means of a set of partial differential equations for the diffusion-reaction process, with concentration-dependent difiusivities [105-108]. Their main assumptions were that reactions were fadlitated only toward the end of the mixing process, such as at the end of the reaction injection-molding process, wherein molecular diffusion was significant. It was also assumed that the diisocyanate and diols formed lamellar mixing structures, whereby alternative striations of diisocyanates and diols were present. [Pg.32]

Yang et al [14] also developed a model that functions in a very similar way to that by Zhu et al [13]. It again considers a mixed friction model with friction split into that developed by the process of shearing the lubricant and also that due to asperity contact. The same assumptions were taken as regards the use of the Greenwood ami Tripp model [25] and the method used to sum the friction with respect to the asperity contact area is also familiar. [Pg.39]

The two models commonly used for the analysis of processes in which axial mixing is of importance are (1) the series of perfectly mixed stages and (2) the axial-dispersion model. The latter, which will be used in the following, is based on the assumption that a diffusion process in the flow direction is superimposed upon the net flow. This model has been widely used for the analysis of single-phase flow systems, and its use for a continuous phase in a two-phase system appears justified. For a dispersed phase (for example, a bubble phase) in a two-phase system, as discussed by Miyauchi and Vermeulen, the model is applicable if all of the dispersed phase at a given level in a column is at the same concentration. Such will be the case if the bubbles coalesce and break up rapidly. However, the model is probably a useful approximation even if this condition is not fulfilled. It is assumed in the following that the model is applicable for a continuous as well as for a dispersed phase in gas-liquid-particle operations. [Pg.87]

The mathematical models used to infer rates of water motion from the conservative properties and biogeochemical rates from nonconservative ones were flrst developed in the 1960s. Although they require acceptance of several assumptions, these models represent an elegant approach to obtaining rate information from easily measured constituents in seawater, such as salinity and the concentrations of the nonconservative chemical of interest. These models use an Eulerian approach. That is, they look at how a conservative property, such as the concentration of a conservative solute C, varies over time in an infinitesimally small volume of the ocean. Since C is conservative, its concentrations can only be altered by water transport, either via advection and/or turbulent mixing. Both processes can move water through any or all of the three dimensions... [Pg.95]

Mass and energy transport occur throughout all of the various sandwich layers. These processes, along with electrochemical kinetics, are key in describing how fuel cells function. In this section, thermal transport is not considered, and all of the models discussed are isothermal and at steady state. Some other assumptions include local equilibrium, well-mixed gas channels, and ideal-gas behavior. The section is outlined as follows. First, the general fundamental equations are presented. This is followed by an examination of the various models for the fuel-cell sandwich in terms of the layers shown in Figure 5. Finally, the interplay between the various layers and the results of sandwich models are discussed. [Pg.450]

Important limitations of the PBPK approach are realized for class 3 and 4 compounds with significant active distribution/absorption processes, where biliary elimination is a major component of the elimination process or where the assumptions of flow-limited distribution and well mixed compartments are not valid and permeability-limited distribution is apparent. These drawbacks could be addressed by the addition of permeability barriers for some tissues and by the incorporation of a more complex liver model which addresses active uptake into the liver, active efflux into the bile, biliary elimination and enterohepatic recirculation. However, this improvement to current methodologies requires the availability of the appropriate input data for quantification of the various processes involved as well as validation of the corresponding in vitro to in vivo scaling approaches. [Pg.237]


See other pages where Mixing process model assumptions is mentioned: [Pg.167]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.3454]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.573]    [Pg.2684]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.1378]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.1338]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.685]    [Pg.182]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.77 ]




SEARCH



Mixed models

Mixing models

Mixing process modeling

Modeling assumptions

Modeling mixing

© 2024 chempedia.info