Miscibility glass transition

Polycarbonate—polyester blends were introduced in 1980, and have steadily increased sales to a volume of about 70,000 t. This blend, which is used on exterior parts for the automotive industry, accounting for 85% of the volume, combines the toughness and impact strength of polycarbonate with the crystallinity and inherent solvent resistance of PBT, PET, and other polyesters. Although not quite miscible, polycarbonate and PBT form a fine-grained blend, which upon analysis shows the glass-transition temperature of the polycarbonate and the melting point of the polyester. 

Fig. 2. Glass-transition temperature, T, for two commercially available, miscible blend systems (a) poly(phenylene oxide) (PPO) and polystyrene (PS) (42) ...

Park et al. [20] reported on the synthesis of poly-(chloroprene-co-isobutyl methacrylate) and its compati-bilizing effect in immiscible polychloroprene-poly(iso-butyl methacrylate) blends. A copolymer of chloroprene rubber (CR) and isobutyl methacrylate (iBMA) poly[CP-Co-(BMA)] and a graft copolymer of iBMA and poly-chloroprene [poly(CR-g-iBMA)] were prepared for comparison. Blends of CR and PiBMA are prepared by the solution casting technique using THF as the solvent. The morphology and glass-transition temperature behavior indicated that the blend is an immiscible one. It was found that both the copolymers can improve the miscibility, but the efficiency is higher in poly(CR-Co-iBMA) than in poly(CR-g-iBMA),... 

In a fundamental sense, the miscibility, adhesion, interfacial energies, and morphology developed are all thermodynamically interrelated in a complex way to the interaction forces between the polymers. Miscibility of a polymer blend containing two polymers depends on the mutual solubility of the polymeric components. The blend is termed compatible when the solubility parameter of the two components are close to each other and show a single-phase transition temperature. However, most polymer pairs tend to be immiscible due to differences in their viscoelastic properties, surface-tensions, and intermolecular interactions. According to the terminology, the polymer pairs are incompatible and show separate glass transitions. For many purposes, miscibility in polymer blends is neither required nor de-... 

The PBE dendron has a glass transition at about 40 °C and is soluble in various organic solvents (e.g., THF, acetone, toluene). It is therefore a moldable, thermoplastic, film-forming material. This practical feature is maintained for the lanthanide-cored dendrimer complexes. The complexes are partially miscible with poly(methyl methacrylate), affording transparent luminescence compositions by mixing in solvent. 

Figure 10.7 The phase diagram (a) and the glass transition temperatures (b) of a PSC/PVME mixture obtained, respectively, by light scattering and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Irradiation experiments were performed in the miscible region at 127 C indicated by (X) in the figure of trans-cinnamic acid-labeled polystyrene/poly(vinyl methyl ether) blends.

Though both miscible and immiscible blends are composite materials, their properties are very different. A miscible blend will exhibit a single glass transition temperature that is intermediate between those of the individual polymers. In addition, the physical properties of the blends will also exhibit this intermediate behavior. Immiscible blends, on the other hand, still contain discrete phases of both polymers. This means that they have two glass transition temperatures and that each represents one of the two components of the blend. (A caveat must be added here in that two materials that are immiscible with very small domain sizes will also show a single, intermediate value for Tg.) In addition, the physical properties... 

Several attempts have been made to superimpose creep and stress-relaxation data obtained at different temperatures on styrcne-butadiene-styrene block polymers. Shen and Kaelble (258) found that Williams-Landel-Ferry (WLF) (27) shift factors held around each of the glass transition temperatures of the polystyrene and the poly butadiene, but at intermediate temperatures a different type of shift factor had to be used to make a master curve. However, on very similar block polymers, Lim et ai. (25 )) found that a WLF shift factor held only below 15°C in the region between the glass transitions, and at higher temperatures an Arrhenius type of shift factor held. The reason for this difference in the shift factors is not known. Master curves have been made from creep and stress-relaxation data on partially miscible graft polymers of poly(ethyl acrylate) and poly(mcthyl methacrylate) (260). WLF shift factors held approximately, but the master curves covered 20 to 25 decades of time rather than the 10 to 15 decades for normal one-phase polymers. 

In general, the miscibility between two polymers can be predicted by thermal characterization of the blends [36], One of the most simple and effective ways to predict miscibility between two polymers is to consider the behavior of the glass transition temperature in the blend systems, which is known as the Tg method. In miscible blend systems, only a single 7 g intermediate between two components appears in the amorphous state. Therefore, we studied the change of... 

Table 10 summarizes the glass transition behavior of these polyimide blends and demonstrates that there is only one Tg for each blend. Similar results have been confirmed by Koros of the University of Texas [29], This data confirms that as long as the dianhydride is the same in the composition, the change of 6F diamine from 3,3 to 4,4 does not alter solubility significantly, and the pairs are miscible. The relationship between the Tg and the Fox equation is discussed by MacKnight et al. work [17]. 

Recently, alternative theoretical expressions have been developed by using classical thermodynamic treatments to describe the compositional dependence of the glass transition temperature in miscible blends and further extended also to the epoxywater systems 2S,27). The studies carried out on DGEBA epoxy resins of relatively low glass transition have shown that the plasticization induced by water sorption can be described by theoretical predictions given by ... 

These differences in modulus may be at least partially explained by DSC data such as that in Fig. 10. It is seen that in general the glass transition regions of the ATBN-and CTBN-modified epoxies are broader and have a lower midpoint than those of the control and two siloxane-modified materials. This thermal data suggests that the butadiene oligomers are relatively more miscible with the epoxy and may act as plasticizers. As an additional point, it is likely that the higher molecular weight of the... 

Fig. 2. Correlation of experimental values of the Langmuir capacity parameter (Sq) for C02 at 35 °C with the glass transition temperature of the polymer25) [cf. Eq. (10)]. Pure polymers (PSF = a poly-sulphone 231 COP = a copolyester 26) remaining abbreviations as in the text). Miscible polymer blends O PPO-PS 65> O PC-COP 26>...

---