Micropores membrane

Ceramic, Metal, and Liquid Membranes. The discussion so far implies that membrane materials are organic polymers and, in fact, the vast majority of membranes used commercially are polymer based. However, interest in membranes formed from less conventional materials has increased. Ceramic membranes, a special class of microporous membranes, are being used in ultrafHtration and microfiltration appHcations, for which solvent resistance and thermal stabHity are required. Dense metal membranes, particularly palladium membranes, are being considered for the separation of hydrogen from gas mixtures, and supported or emulsified Hquid films are being developed for coupled and facHitated transport processes. 

Fig. 3. Microporous membranes are characterized by tortuosity, T, porosity, S, and their average pore diameter, d. (a) Cross-sections of porous membranes containing cylindrical pores, (b) Surface views of porous membranes of equal S, but differing pore size.

Fig. 8. Equipment to prepare microporous membranes by the polymer precipitation by cooling technique (23).

Fig. 10. Schematic of casting machine used to make microporous membranes by watervapor imbibition. A casting solution is deposited as a thin film on a moving stainless steel belt. The film passes through a series of humid and dry chambers, where the solvent evaporates from the solution, and water vapor is absorbed from the air. This precipitates the polymer, forming a microporous membrane that is taken up on a collection roU (25).

Cellulose acetate Loeb-Sourirajan reverse osmosis membranes were introduced commercially in the 1960s. Since then, many other polymers have been made into asymmetric membranes in attempts to improve membrane properties. In the reverse osmosis area, these attempts have had limited success, the only significant example being Du Font s polyamide membrane. For gas separation and ultrafUtration, a number of membranes with useful properties have been made. However, the early work on asymmetric membranes has spawned numerous other techniques in which a microporous membrane is used as a support to carry another thin, dense separating layer. 

Although microporous membranes are a topic of research interest, all current commercial gas separations are based on the fourth type of mechanism shown in Figure 36, namely diffusion through dense polymer films. Gas transport through dense polymer membranes is governed by equation 8 where is the flux of component /,andare the partial pressure of the component i on either side of the membrane, /is the membrane thickness, and is a constant called the membrane permeability, which is a measure of the membrane s ability to permeate gas. The ability of a membrane to separate two gases, i and is the ratio of their permeabilities,a, called the membrane selectivity (eq. 9). 

Surface media Captures particles on the upstream surface with efficiencies in excess of depth media, sometimes close to 100% with minimal or no off-loading. Commonly rated according to the smallest particle the media can repeatedly capture. Examples of surface media include ceramic media, microporous membranes, synthetic woven screening media and in certain cases, wire cloth. The media characteristically has a narrow pore size distribution. 

D. S. Cannel, F. Rondelez. Diffusion of polystyrene through microporous membranes. Macromolecules 75 1599-1602, 1980. 

M. P. Bohrer, G. D. Paterson, P. J. Carrol. Hindered diffusion of dextran and ficoll in microporous membranes. Macromolecules 77 1170-1173, 1984. 

Battery makers sometimes view separators with disdain the separator is needed but does not actively contribute to battery operation. Consequently, very little work (relative to that on electrode materials and electrolytes) is directed towards characterizing separators. In fact, development efforts are under way to displace microporous membranes as battery separators and instead to use gel electrolytes or polymer electrolytes. Polymer electrolytes, in particular, promise enhanced safety by elimi-... 

Table l. Commercially available microporous membrane materials used as separators in lithium-ion batteries. 

The processes for manufacturing microporous membranes can be broadly divided into wet processes and dry processes. Both processes usually employ one or more orientation steps to impart porosity and/or increase tensile strength. Figure 2 shows scanning electron micrographs of surfaces of separators made by each process. 

Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs of surfaces of microporous membranes made by wet and dry processes. (a) Setela microporous membrane (net process) (b) Celgard microporous membrane (dry process).

Dasgupta and Jacobs [29] patented a concept of using a gel layer in combination with a microporous membrane. The gel layer acts as an adhesive bridge between separator and electrodes, just as in the flat pack Zn/MnC cell [30], The microporous membrane (for example, Celgard membrane) provides excellent mechanical... 

Table 3. Typical properties of some Celgard microporous membranes. ...

Figure 5. Thermal-mechanical analysis of Celgard microporous membranes.

The predominant RO membranes used in water applications include cellulose polymers, thin film oomposites (TFCs) consisting of aromatic polyamides, and crosslinked polyetherurea. Cellulosic membranes are formed by immersion casting of 30 to 40 percent polymer lacquers on a web immersed in water. These lacquers include cellulose acetate, triacetate, and acetate-butyrate. TFCs are formed by interfacial polymerization that involves coating a microporous membrane substrate with an aqueous prepolymer solution and immersing in a water-immiscible solvent containing a reactant [Petersen, J. Memhr. Sol., 83, 81 (1993)]. The Dow FilmTec FT-30 membrane developed by Cadotte uses 1-3 diaminobenzene prepolymer crosslinked with 1-3 and 1-4 benzenedicarboxylic acid chlorides. These membranes have NaCl retention and water permeability claims. 

Classical LLEs have also been replaced by membrane extractions such as SLM (supported liquid membrane extraction), MMLLE (microporous membrane liquid-liquid extraction) and MESI (membrane extraction with a sorbent interface). All of these techniques use a nonporous membrane, involving partitioning of the analytes [499]. SLM is a sample handling technique which can be used for selective extraction of a particular class of compounds from complex (aqueous) matrices [500]. Membrane extraction with a sorbent interface (MESI) is suitable for VOC analysis (e.g. in a MESI- xGC-TCD configuration) [501,502]. 

MMLLE Microporous membrane liquid-liquid extraction... 

---