Micellar pore

Virtual vertical cutting of this unimolecular barrel gives the barrel-stave , horizontal cutting the barrel-hoop , horizontal and vertical cutting the barrel-rosette motif (Fig. 11.2). More complex motifs that include modification of the lipid bilayer are summarized as micellar pores. 

The barrel-stave architecture is a classic for both biological and synthetic ion channels and pores (Fig. 11.3). Whereas barrel-hoop motifs have received considerable attention, barrel-rosette ion channels and pores are just beginning to emerge. The more complex micellar (or toroidal ) ion channels and pores are, on the one hand, different from detergents because the micellar defects introduced into the lipid bilayer are only transient. Micellar pores differ, on the other hand, from membrane-spanning (i.e. transmembrane ) barrel-stave pores because (a) they disturb the bilayer suprastructure and (b) they always remain at the membrane-water interface. A representative synthetic barrel-stave pore is shown in Fig. 11.3 [3, 4] comprehensive collections of recently created structures can be found in pertinent reviews [2],... 

NBD probes are often used to assay flip-flop. Flip-flop refers to the reversible transversal diffusion of lipids from one leaflet to the other leaflet of a lipid bilayer membrane. In intact membranes, this transversal diffusion is very slow (fi/2 on the order of hours to days). However, it can be accelerated by biological or synthetic flippases, which are a special class of membrane transporters related to ion carriers. Alternatively, micellar pores are synthetic ion channels and pores with flippase activity and can thus be identified with flip-flop assay (Figure 2 interfacial location of the transporter, as second distinctive characteristic of micellar pores, can be identified by fluorescence depth quenching experiments with DOXYL probes). 

Micellar/polymer (MP) chemical enhanced oil recovery systems have demonstrated the greatest potential of all of the recovery systems under study (170) and equivalent oil recovery for mahogany and first-intent petroleum sulfonates has been shown (171). Many somewhat different sulfonate, ie, slug, formulations, slug sizes (pore volumes), and recovery design systems were employed. Most of these field tests were deemed technically successful, but uneconomical based on prevailing oil market prices (172,173). 

Ultrafiltration of micellar solutions combines the high permeate flows commonly found in ultrafiltration systems with the possibility of removing molecules independent of their size, since micelles can specifically solubilize or bind low molecular weight components. Characteristics of this separation technique, known as micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF), are that micelles bind specific compounds and subsequent ultrafiltration separates the surrounding aqueous phase from the micelles [70]. The pore size of the UF membrane must be chosen such, that the micelles are retained but the unbound components can pass the membrane freely. Alternatively, proteins such as BSA have been used in stead of micelles to obtain similar enan-tioselective aggregates [71]. 

Effectiveness of selective adsorption of phenanthrene in Triton X-100 solution depends on surface area, pore size distribution, and surface chemical properties of adsorbents. Since the micellar structure is not rigid, the monomer enters the pores and is adsorbed on the internal surfaces. The size of a monomer of Triton X-100 (27 A) is larger than phenanthrene (11.8 A) [4]. Therefore, only phenanthrene enters micropores with width between 11.8 A and 27 A. Table 1 shows that the area only for phenanthrene adsorption is the highest for 20 40 mesh. From XPS results, the carbon content on the surfaces was increased with decreasing particle size. Thus, 20 40 mesh activated carbon is more beneficial for selective adsorption of phenanthrene compared to Triton X-100. 

A typical sequence followed in this test series consists in injecting (1) a micellar slug of one pore volume of aqueous solution of 4% of the preceding pseudobinary system (2% sulfonate/2% Genapol) (2) a slug of desorbent solution corresponding to a fixed amount of additive (e.g. equal to 1 PV at a concentration of 0.5 %) (3) at least 1.5 PV of brine with no additive. 

Figures 5 and 6 show that the concentration of the two surfactants in the effluents increases simultaneously with the production of the desorbent, which confirms the mixed micellization mechanism described above. Figure 5, where the three additives are produced lately, illustrates the phenomenon particularly well. At the lower pH corresponding to strong adsorption conditions for sulfonate (test 4), the one pore-volume micellar slug would have been entirely consumed by the medium in the absence of any desorbent.

Efficient extraction of proteins has been reported with reverse micellar liquid membrane systems, where the pores of the membrane are filled with the reverse micellar phase and the enzyme is extracted from the aqueous phase on one side of membrane while the back extraction into a second aqueous phase takes place at the other side. By this, both the forward and back extractions can be performed using one membrane module [132,208]. Armstrong and Li [209] confirmed the general trends observed in phase transfer using a glass diffusion cell with a reverse micellar liquid membrane. Electrostatic interactions and surfactant concentration affected the protein transfer into the organic membrane and... 

The structure and thermodynamics of formation of mixed micelles is of great theoretical interest. Micelles are also present and often integrally involved in practical processes. For example, in a small pore volume surfactant flooding process (sometimes called micellar flooding), the solution injected into an oil field generally contains 5-12 weight X surfactant (i) and the surfactant is predominately in micellar form in the reservoir water. In detergency, solubilization can be... 

A few papers have been published recently on the problem of surfactant adsorption maxima on solids in the region of the CMC (1-5). Scamehorn et al. (1,2) and Trogus et al. (3) expTTined the origin of these maxima by various radios of the surfactant solution to the solid, in connection with isomeric impurity of the surfactant. Ananthapadmanabhan and Soniasundaran (4) examined critically the presence of such maxima from the viewpoint of various proposed adsorption mechanisms. They have shown that a mechanism including micellar exclusion, mixed micelle formation and properties of solids, such as the pore size, cannot explain satisfac-... 

Micelles and vesicles can be formed above a certain concentration. For instance, small micelles are formed above critical micellar concentration, cmc. (The latter abbreviation is often used for critical vesicle concentration, too. However, sometimes a more general term critical aggregate concentration, cac is also applied.) Bilayers of specific amphiphiles with two tails are typical of the central part of cell membranes discussed in some detail in the next chapter. Studying artificial mono- and bilayers (uniform or with built in pores) is indispensable for gaining information about the structure and functioning of cell membranes involving the transport through them. 

The process utilizing supramolecular organization involves pore expansion in silicas. A schematic view of such micelles built from the pure surfactant and those involving in addition n-alkane is shown in Figure 4.9. Another example of pore creation provides a cross-linking polymerization of monomers within the surfactant bilayer [30]. As a result vesicle-templated hollow spheres are created. Dendrimers like that shown in Figure 4.10 exhibit some similarity to micellar structures and can host smaller molecules inside themselves [2c]. Divers functionalized dendrimers that are thought to present numerous prospective applications will be presented in Section 7.6. 

Besides the above differentiation, restricted-access media can be further subdivided on the basis of the topochemistry of the bonded phase. Packings with a uniform surface topochemistry show a homogenous ligand coverage, whereas packings with a dual topochemistry show a different chemical modification of the pore internal surface and the particle external surface (114). Restricted-access media of the former type are divided into mixed-mode and mixed-function phases, bonded-micellar phases, biomatrix, binary-layered phases, shielded hydrophobic phases, and polymer-coated mixed-function phases. Restricted-access media of the latter type include the Pinkerton s internal surface reversed-phase, Haginaka s internal surface reversed-phase diol, alkyl-diol silica, Kimata s restricted-access media, dual-zone phase, tris-modified Styrosorb, Svec s restricted-access media, diphil sorbents, Ultrabiosep phases. Bio Trap phases, and semipermeable surface phases. 

Incorporating jointly decane and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene during the micellar solution preparation allows us to expand further the pore size, which can be adjusted up to 9.0 nm. Using only alkane [16] and in particular decane [17] as swelling agent the maximum pore size archived was 5.0 nm. 

Synthesis conditions, specific surface area (Sbet), pore volume (V) and pore diameter (0) of products obtained by adding different source of silica to the micellar solution ... 

From Table 1, it is evident, compared to the sample obtained without introduction of decane with the pore size of 2.6 nm, that the introduction of decane during the synthesis has a beneficial effect on the pore diameter. However the largest pore size is obtained if the swelling agent is added during the preparation of the micellar solution. In fact, if the decane is... 

---