Micellar aggregates, molecular

Some of the more remarkable examples of this form of topologically controlled radical polymerization were reported by Percec et cii.231 234 Dendron maeromonomers were observed to self-assemble at a concentration above 0.20 mol/L in benzene to form spherical micellar aggregates where the polymerizable double bonds are concentrated inside. The polymerization of the aggregates initiated by AIBN showed some living characteristics. Diversities were narrow and molecular weights were dictated by the size of the aggregate. The shape of the resultant macroniolecules, as observed by atomic force microscopy (ATM), was found to depend on Xn. With A, <20, the polymer remained spherical. On the other hand, with X>20, the polymer became cylindrical.231,232... 

Solutions of surfactant-stabilized nanogels share both the advantage of gels (drastic reduction of molecular diffusion and of internal dynamics of solubilizates entrapped in the micellar aggregates) and of nonviscous liquids (nanogel-containing reversed micelles diffuse and are dispersed in a macroscopicaUy nonviscous medium). Effects on the lifetime of excited species and on the catalytic activity and stability of immobilized enzymes can be expected. 

In aqueous solution, amphiphilic molecules aggregate into micelles above the critical micelle concentration. Such solutions have been the object of research for many years, with special interest in shape and size of these micellar aggregates [37]. Size and shape (spherical, wormlike, or disklike micelles) depend strongly on the molecular structure of the amphiphilic molecule. 

As we demonstrate in this chapter, FTIR spectroscopy can be an ideal technique for studying the molecular packing in micellar aggregates. The major... 

This new family of mesoporous silica and aluminosilicate compounds were obtained by the introduction of supramolecular assemblies. Micellar aggregates, rather than molecular species, were used as structure-directing agents. Then, the growth of inorganic or hybrid networks templated by structured surfactant assemblies permitted the construction of novel types of nanostructured materials in the mesoscopic scale (2-100 nm) [110,113,117],... 

Micellar aggregates are considered in chapter 3 and a critical concentration is defined on the basis of a change in the shape of the size distribution of aggregates. This is followed by the examination, via a second order perturbation theory, of the phase behavior of a sterically stabilized non-aqueous colloidal dispersion containing free polymer molecules. This chapter is also concerned with the thermodynamic stability of microemulsions, which is treated via a new thermodynamic formalism. In addition, a molecular thermodynamics approach is suggested, which can predict the structural and compositional characteristics of microemulsions. Thermodynamic approaches similar to that used for microemulsions are applied to the phase transition in monolayers of insoluble surfactants and to lamellar liquid crystals. 

The resulting micellar aggregates resemble, in most of their aspects, those obtained with classical low molecular weight surfactants, but the nonergodicity of BCs allows the preparation of many different kinetically frozen morphologies. From the initial basic observations of micelle formation by Merret in 1954 [24] to the last structures of living micelles obtained by Winnik and co-workers in 2007... 

The o c experimental results for the water/pentanol/potas-slum oleate system (18,19) show that a pentanol/potasslum oleate molecular ratio of 5.5 and lower should give a premlcellar aggregate/lamellar liquid crystal transition instead of the pre-micellar aggregate/Inverse micelle transition at high alcohol/ soap ratios. 

The reverse micelle phase behavior in supercritical fluids is markedly different than in liquids. By increasing fluid pressure, the maximum amount of solubilized water increases, indicating that these higher molecular weight structures are better solvated by the denser fluid phase. The phase behavior of these systems is in part due to packing constraints of the surfactant molecules and the solubility of large micellar aggregates in the supercritical fluid phase. 

For low molecular mass amphiphiles, hydrophobic interactions and surface effects determine the critical concentration at which micellar aggregates are favored over the molecularly dispersed amphiphilic solutes. For polysurfactants, however, the amphiphiles are linked together and the dynamic exchange of associated and non-associated amphiphilic monomer units is prevented. Consequently the micelle formation does not only depends on the hydrophilic/ hydrophobic balance of the monomer... 

---