Methyl bromide production

In the late 1980s, however, the discovery of a noble metal catalyst that could tolerate and destroy halogenated hydrocarbons such as methyl bromide in a fixed-bed system was reported (52,53). The products of the reaction were water, carbon dioxide, hydrogen bromide, and bromine. Generally, a scmbber would be needed to prevent downstream equipment corrosion. However, if the focus of the control is the VOCs and the CO rather than the methyl bromide, a modified catalyst formulation can be used that is able to tolerate the methyl bromide, but not destroy it. In this case the methyl bromide passes through the bed unaffected, and designing the system to avoid downstream effects is not necessary. Destmction efficiencies of hydrocarbons and CO of better than 95% have been reported, and methyl bromide destmctions between 0 and 85% (52). 

Although ethereal solutions of methyl lithium may be prepared by the reaction of lithium wire with either methyl iodide or methyl bromide in ether solution, the molar equivalent of lithium iodide or lithium bromide formed in these reactions remains in solution and forms, in part, a complex with the methyllithium. Certain of the ethereal solutions of methyl 1ithium currently marketed by several suppliers including Alfa Products, Morton/Thiokol, Inc., Aldrich Chemical Company, and Lithium Corporation of America, Inc., have been prepared from methyl bromide and contain a full molar equivalent of lithium bromide. In several applications such as the use of methyllithium to prepare lithium dimethyl cuprate or the use of methyllithium in 1,2-dimethyoxyethane to prepare lithium enolates from enol acetates or triraethyl silyl enol ethers, the presence of this lithium salt interferes with the titration and use of methyllithium. There is also evidence which indicates that the stereochemistry observed during addition of methyllithium to carbonyl compounds may be influenced significantly by the presence of a lithium salt in the reaction solution. For these reasons it is often desirable to have ethereal solutions... 

Decision allocating production and import quotas for methyl bromide, import quotas for hydrobromofluorocarbons and consumption quotas for hydrochlorofluorocarbons for the period 1 January to 31 December 1995... 

Consumption and production of methyl bromide will end in 2005 in industrial countries (subject to phase-out stages and exemptions) and in 2015 in developing countries. 

With magnesium methyl bromide tuberostemonine gives a product, which on treatment with ammonium chloride solution yields a substance (a), C24H4JO4N, m.p. 110-2 , but with dilute sulphuric acid, furnishes the dehydrated compound, (b) C24H3903N, m.p. 164 . The results of this reaction are represented as follows —... 

Molecules that possess more than one nucleophilic si are referred to as ambident nucleophiles. Sn2 reactioi involving these nucleophiles may lead to mixtures i products. For example, nucleophilic attack by nitrite c methyl bromide gives both nitromethane and methyl nitrit... 

Examine atomic charges and the electrostatic potential nu for nitrite anion. Which atom(s) is most electron riel Which product would be obtained if this atom behav as a nucleophile in its reation with methyl bromide. 

Other possible ambident nucleophiles include cyanii anion (CN ), methyl sulfinate anion (CH3SO2 ), ar acetone enolate (CH3COCH2 ). Identify the most electro rich atom(s) in each anion (based on charges alone), ar indicate the major product that should result from an S, reaction with methyl bromide at this atom(s). 

Another way to assess nucleophilic reactivity is to examii the shape of the nucleophile s electron-donor orbital (th is the highest-occupied molecular orbital or HOMC Examine the shape of each anion s HOMO. At which ato would an electrophile, like methyl bromide, find the be orbital overlap (Note This would involve overlap of tl the HOMO of the nucleophile and the lowest-unoccupif molecular orbital or LUMO of CH3Br.) Draw all of tl products that might result from an Sn2 reaction wi CHaBr at these atoms. 

Triphenylmethylphosphonium bromide A pressure bottle is charged with a solution of 55 g (0.21 mole) of triphenylphosphine in 45 ml of dry benzene and cooled in an ice-salt bath. A commercially available ampoule of methyl bromide is cooled below 0° (ice-salt bath), opened, and 28 g (0.29 mole, approx. 16.2 ml) is added to the bottle in one portion. The pressure bottle is tightly stoppered, brought to room temperature, and allowed to stand for 2 days. After this time, the bottle is opened and the product is collected by suction filtration, the transfer being effected with hot benzene as needed. The yield of triphenylphosphonium bromide is about 74 g (99%), mp 232-233°. This material should be thoroughly dried (vacuum oven at 100°) before use in preparing the ylide. 

Preparation of the Methyl Bromide To the acetone solution of the free base was added an acetone solution, containing an excess of methyl bromide. Within a few minutes the methobromide started to crystallize. The mixture was allowed to stand for several hours. The crystallized solid was filtered, and additional product was obtained by evaporation of the filtrate. The yield was nearly quantitative. After recrystallization from acetone, the product melted at 329°C. 

A mixture containing 8 g (0.06 mol) of N-methyl-3-chloro-piperidine and 13.6 g (0.06 mol) of benzilic acid in 50 cc of anhydrous isopropyl alcohol was refluxed for 3 days the isopropyl alcohol was removed by distillation in vacuo, the residue treated with dilute aqueous hydrochloric acid and the aqueous acid mixture extracted repeatedly with ether. The aqueous phase was separated, made strongly alkaline with 20% aqueous sodium hydroxide and extracted with ether. The ether extracts were dried with potassium carbonate and distilled the product was collected at 175° to 176°C (0.03 mm), yield 11.5 g (59%). The ester base thus prepared was then dissolved in 75 cc of isopropyl alcohol and 3.4 g (0.037 mol) methyl bromide added. The reaction mixture was allowed to stand at 30°C for 2 days and the product isolated by filtration, yield, 13 g (87%), MP 228° to 229°C dec. 

The bromoketone 17 was prepared via bromination of 15 with PTAB in DME. Hydrogen bromide, formed during the reaction, reacted with DME to generate methyl bromide and 2-methoxyethanol, both of which could be easily removed from the reaction medium under vacuum. This method was more convenient than the bromination reaction in TH F because the resulting 4-bromobutanol by-product formed from THF was not volatile. The bromide 17 was used directly in the next reaction, partly because 17 is rather reactive with limited stability. 

The solvent dependence of the reaction rate is also consistent with this mechanistic scheme. Comparison of the rate constants for isomerizations of PCMT in chloroform and in nitrobenzene shows a small (ca. 40%) rate enhancement in the latter solvent. Simple electrostatic theory predicts that nucleophilic substitutions in which neutral reactants are converted to ionic products should be accelerated in polar solvents (23), so that a rate increase in nitrobenzene is to be expected. In fact, this effect is often very small (24). For example, Parker and co-workers (25) report that the S 2 reaction of methyl bromide and dimethyl sulfide is accelerated by only 50% on changing the solvent from 88% (w/w) methanol-water to N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) at low ionic strength this is a far greater change in solvent properties than that investigated in the present work. Thus a small, positive dependence of reaction rate on solvent polarity is implicit in the sulfonium ion mechanism. 

Methyl bromide has been identified as an ozone-depleting substance and is being gradually removed from world markets. Current legislation and plans call for the elimination of methyl bromide in most industrial countries by 2005, with possible exemptions for quarantine (UNEP, 1996). Currently there is an extensive search worldwide for products that are alternatives to methyl bromide (Kawakami, 1999). These alternatives are broadly defined and include components of management plans such as sanitation, monitoring, contact insecticides, heat treatments, and modified atmospheres, in addition to new fumigants (Batchelor, 1998). 

---