Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Method optimization parameters

Setting up a dosage method includes three important steps (1) development of the GC-MS method (optimizing parameters for chromatography and mass spectrometry), (2) optimization of the steps of sample preparation (extraction, re-concentration, chemical derivation, etc.), and (3) validation. [Pg.113]

Method development remains the most challenging aspect of chiral chromatographic analysis, and the need for rapid method development is particularly acute in the pharmaceutical industry. To complicate matters, even structurally similar compounds may not be resolved under the same chromatographic conditions, or even on the same CSP. Rapid column equilibration in SFC speeds the column screening process, and automated systems accommodating multiple CSPs and modifiers now permit unattended method optimization in SFC [36]. Because more compounds are likely to be resolved with a single set of parameters in SFC than in LC, the analyst stands a greater chance of success on the first try in SFC [37]. The increased resolution obtained in SFC may also reduce the number of columns that must be evaluated to achieve the desired separation. [Pg.305]

Optimal parameters for the extraction, washing and stripping of niobium were determined to be number of stages for all three processes - 4, volumetric ratios Vorg Vaqu are 1 1, 20 1 and 8 1, respectively. Additional fine purification of the extractant was recommended by stripping of tantalum and niobium remainders using a 0.5% wt. ammonia solution. This additional stripping leads to final concentrations of both tantalum and niobium in the extractant that are < 0.001 g/1. Table 62 shows the purity of niobium oxide prepared by the described method. [Pg.289]

To determine the optimal parameters, traditional methods, such as conjugate gradient and simplex are often not adequate, because they tend to get trapped in local minima. To overcome this difficulty, higher-order methods, such as the genetic algorithm (GA) can be employed [31,32]. The GA is a general purpose functional minimization procedure that requires as input an evaluation, or test function to express how well a particular laser pulse achieves the target. Tests have shown that several thousand evaluations of the test function may be required to determine the parameters of the optimal fields [17]. This presents no difficulty in the simple, pure-state model discussed above. [Pg.253]

To our surprise and satisfaction, the general approach worked the CBI derivatives did chemiluminescence, and the sensitivity enhancement was 30- to 50-fold over fluorescence With this success, we embarked on a more thorough study of chemiluminescence with the goal of optimizing the method. Identifiable parameters that affected the efficiency of light emission from a chemically generated fluorescent molecule included ... [Pg.139]

Parameter estimates should not differ by orders of magnitude from those evaluated using well established methods of thermodynamics or known from the literature several rules concerning adsorption phenomena have been worked out by Boudart et al. (1967) the optimal parameter estimates should not differ very much from the initial guesses if the latter were determined in well designed separate dedicated experiments. [Pg.550]

Table 2.3 is used to classify the differing systems of equations, encountered in chemical reactor applications and the normal method of parameter identification. As shown, the optimal values of the system parameters can be estimated using a suitable error criterion, such as the methods of least squares, maximum likelihood or probability density function. [Pg.112]

Five critical points for the methane-n-hexane system in the temperature range of 198 to 273 K measured by Lin et al. (1977) are available. By employing the Trebble-Bishnoi EoS in our critical point regression least squares estimation method, the parameter set (k , kb) was found to be the optimal one. Convergence from an initial guess of (ka,kb=0.001, -0.001) was achieved in six iterations. The estimated values are given in Table 14.8. [Pg.264]

Indeed, using the Gauss-Newton method with an initial estimate of k(0)=(450, 7) convergence to the optimum was achieved in three iterations with no need to employ Marquardt s modification. The optimal parameter estimates are k = 420.2 8.68% and k2= 5.705 24.58%. It should be noted however that this type of a model can often lead to ill-conditioned estimation problems if the data have not been collected both at low and high values of the independent variable. The convergence to the optimum is shown in Table 17.5 starting with the initial guess k(0)=(l, 1). [Pg.326]

Method validation is carried out to provide objective evidence that a method is suitable for a given application. A formal assessment of the validation information against the measurement requirements specification and other important method performance parameters is therefore required. Although validation is described as a sequential process, in reality it can involve more than one iteration to optimize some performance parameters, e.g. if a performance parameter is outside the required limits, method improvement followed by revalidation is needed. [Pg.92]

Compounds were optimized in positive ionization mode and in negative mode if necessary. Automaton can also perform automatic MS method development from solutions containing multiple compounds to increase throughput. When mixture solutions are used, Automaton injects a mixture once to determine all precursor ions and DP values and then injects once per compound to determine product ion and CE value. This approach allows automatic and unattended optimization of MS parameters for hundreds of compounds. The optimized parameters are stored in a compound database that permits fast and efficient retrieval of information about a specific compound and allows a compound to be used in multiple assays, eliminating the need to re-optimize the LC/MS/MS conditions. [Pg.236]

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and Soxhlet extraction under various experimental conditions were applied for spiked poly(vinyl) chloride samples. Extracted dyes were separated in an ODS column (250 X 4.6 mm i.d. particle size 5 jum) using methanol as the mobile phase. Dyes are well separated by this method as demonstrated in Fig. 3.59. The optimal parameters of the extraction methods are compiled in Table 3.23. Recoveries depended on both the type of extraction method and the chemical structure of the dye. It was found that the highest recovery can be obtained by MAE and the extraction efficacy was the lowest for Solvent red 24 [129],... [Pg.440]

FIGURE 5.28 Comparison of the test errors for the glass data using different classification methods. One hundred replications of the evaluation procedure (described in the text) are performed for the optimal parameter choices (if the method depends on the choice of a parameter). The methods are LDA, LR, Gaussian mixture models (Mix), fc-NN classification, classification trees (Tree), ANN, and SVMs. [Pg.253]

Method Linear Parameters to Optimize Direct Use in High Dimensions Data Need to Be Autoscaled... [Pg.260]

After method optimization the most important aspects of the validation are checked in a pre-validation study to examine whether the method is ready for evaluation at the customer site. If necessary, method optimization may need to be repeated. Suggested parameters to be... [Pg.178]

F. Ozgulsen, R.A. Adomaitis, and A. Cinar. A numerical method for determining optimal parameter values in forced periodic operation. Chem. Eng. Sci., 47 605-613, 1992. [Pg.114]

The multilevel coordinate search (MGS) method was used to optimize parameters to get best fit between the experimental and predicted intensities. The NOE R-factor was used as the energy function to be minimized. A version of the MGS method was written based on the version presented by Huyer and Neumaier [65]. The algorithm performs the minimization by a standard coordinate search method. The method was carefully tested by the use of different starting points for the coordinate search and using simulated data sets. This alleviates local minima trapping by MGS, and identifies fhe global minimum within the parameter ranges used in the optimization. [Pg.36]

Fig. 11 Comparison of experimental STDs (shaded circles) and calculated STD values (solid line) from CORCEMA-ST method for the crystal structure of chicken liver DHFR/TMP complex. The optimized parameters are tl =0.101 ns tp = 20.43 ns t i = 0.81 ps Tm2 = 3.04 ps Tm3 = 3.26 ps leakage factor = 0.065 and NOE R-factor = 0.076. Reprinted with permission from [75] 2005, American Chemical Society... Fig. 11 Comparison of experimental STDs (shaded circles) and calculated STD values (solid line) from CORCEMA-ST method for the crystal structure of chicken liver DHFR/TMP complex. The optimized parameters are tl =0.101 ns tp = 20.43 ns t i = 0.81 ps Tm2 = 3.04 ps Tm3 = 3.26 ps leakage factor = 0.065 and NOE R-factor = 0.076. Reprinted with permission from [75] 2005, American Chemical Society...
Like ANNs, SVMs can be useful in cases where the x-y relationships are highly nonlinear and poorly nnderstood. There are several optimization parameters that need to be optimized, including the severity of the cost penalty , the threshold fit error, and the nature of the nonlinear kernel. However, if one takes care to optimize these parameters by cross-validation (Section 12.4.3) or similar methods, the susceptibility to overfitting is not as great as for ANNs. Furthermore, the deployment of SVMs is relatively simpler than for other nonlinear modeling alternatives (such as local regression, ANNs, nonlinear variants of PLS) because the model can be expressed completely in terms of a relatively low number of support vectors. More details regarding SVMs can be obtained from several references [70-74]. [Pg.389]


See other pages where Method optimization parameters is mentioned: [Pg.197]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.82]   


SEARCH



Method parameters

Optimization methods

Optimization parameter

Optimized method

© 2024 chempedia.info