Phase-appropriate method development

When analytes lack the selectivity in the new polar organic mode or reversed-phase mode, typical normal phase (hexane with ethanol or isopropanol) can also be tested. Normally, 20 % ethanol will give a reasonable retention time for most analytes on vancomycin and teicoplanin, while 40 % ethanol is more appropriate for ristocetin A CSP. The hexane/alcohol composition is favored on many occasions (preparative scale, for example) and offers better selectivity for some less polar compounds. Those compounds with a carbonyl group in the a or (3 position to the chiral center have an excellent chance to be resolved in this mode. The simplified method development protocols are illustrated in Fig. 2-6. The optimization will be discussed in detail later in this chapter. 

The development phase invokes many instances where reactions must be optimised quickly because of changes in the route to or specification of the drug substance. The final challenge is to converge upon the most appropriate and environmentally acceptable methods for manufacture. In identifying optimal synthesis conditions, real-time tuning of a mi-... 

This derivation shows that retention time is dependant on three factors temperature, energies of intermolecular interactions and flow rate. Temperature and flow rate are controlled by the user. Energies of intermolecular interactions are controlled by stationary phase choice. This theory is also the basis for the popular software programs that are available for computer-assisted method development and optimization [4,5,6,7]. More detailed descriptions of the theory behind retention times can be found in the appropriate chapters in the texts listed in the bibliography. 

What is the reason for the overwhelming acceptance of stationary phases based on high-purity silicas in the pharmaceutical industry The answer is simple superior peak shapes for analytes with basic functional groups, which has been a problem with older phases. The older, low-purity silicas contain metal ions buried in the matrix of the silica. These contaminants acidify the surface silanols, and the consequence is a strong and non-uniform interaction with basic analytes. This in turn results in tailing peaks, which is an impediment for accurate peak integration and peak resolution. Of course, adding appropriate additives, such as amine modifiers, to the mobile phase can solve these difficulties. But this is an unnecessary and undesired complication in methods development. Therefore, silicas that are free from this complication are much preferred. 

The overall process from concept to validated method is illustrated on Page 4 (Figure 1). Once an appropriate analytical principle has been selected and the method performance criteria defined, the actual method development process can begin. Usually, this phase is carried out using pure materials and limited samples that are known, or assumed, to be homogeneous. 

With all these tools, you can usually find a way to separate the components of a mixture if it does not contain too many compounds. If reversed-phase chromatography fails, normal-phase chromatography or one of the methods in Chapter 26 could be appropriate. Method development is part science, part art, and part luck. 

The fast isomerization of the spiropyran to the merocyanine provides a possibility of generating an interfacial shock wave. The methods used so far in studying the transmission of waves in mono-layers and the adjacent bulk phases require mechanical (16) or electrocapillary (17) excitation of the interface which involves the displacement of the aqueous bulk phase. In addition, the range of frequencies accessible to the investigation of interfacial waves by the conventional techniques is very limited. The fast photochemical generation of an interfacial shock wave is strictly occurring in the monolayer and provides a larger spectrum of frequencies which can be fully explored only after the development of appropriate detection methods. 

Apart from regulations aimed at product quality, there are also issues concerned with the safe operation of certain processes, for example, where genetically modified or pathogenic microorganisms are being handled. In such cases, the bioseparation process is normally contained in other words, the potential for release of hazardous material is minimized by various methods. Many bioseparations also involve the use of solvents which must be handled in appropriately designed equipment and facilities with proper explosion protection. Again there are cost implications associated with these types of processes which must be identified at the outset of the development phase. 

Initially the mobile phase was too strong and elutes all of the compounds at V0 The mobile phase strength is decreased stepwise until all four components are resolved. It is important to reemphasize that when using ion suppression, the additive used to adjust the pH must remain at a constant concentration during the method development process. Also, it should be mentioned that while acetic acid adjusts the pH to an approximate value of 3 and is often used in ion suppression, it is not a buffer. Therefore, use of a sodium acetate buffer (0.001 to 0.01 M) may be more appropriate for some bonded phases. 

Method development is simply finding an appropriate mobile phase (the blend of the good and poor solvents) in which the sample solutes are retained and separated. For this experiment the structures of sample components are shown in Figure 12-1, methanol is the strong solvent and water is the poor solvent. The water contains acetic acid which adjusts the pH so that the aspirin is not ionized. This ionization control is necessary to have adequate retention and good peak shape for the aspirin. 

---