Metal extraction, effect

The enhanced rate expressions for regimes 3 and 4 have been presented (48) and can be appHed (49,50) when one phase consists of a pure reactant, for example in the saponification of an ester. However, it should be noted that in the more general case where component C in equation 19 is transferred from one inert solvent (A) to another (B), an enhancement of the mass-transfer coefficient in the B-rich phase has the effect of moving the controlling mass-transfer resistance to the A-rich phase, in accordance with equation 17. Resistance in both Hquid phases is taken into account in a detailed model (51) which is apphcable to the reversible reactions involved in metal extraction. This model, which can accommodate the case of interfacial reaction, has been successfully compared with rate data from the Hterature (51). 

One of the most attractive roles of liquid liquid interfaces that we found in solvent extraction kinetics of metal ions is a catalytic effect. Shaking or stirring of the solvent extraction system generates a wide interfacial area or a large specific interfacial area defined as the interfacial area divided by a bulk phase volume. Metal extractants have a molecular structure which has both hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups. Therefore, they have a property of interfacial adsorptivity much like surfactant molecules. Adsorption of extractant at the liquid liquid interface can dramatically facilitate the interfacial com-plexation which has been exploited from our research. 

Chlorination and fluorination, as processes of metal extraction, are important not only because they are effective in liberating metal values from refractory ores but also because the chlorides and the fluorides are excellent interprocess intermediates for metal reduction. The chlorides have the additional advantage of being compounds which may be made very pure by certain additional processes. 

Metal effect pigments, 29 411 Metal emission limits, 23 183 Metal extractants, 20 750 Metal extruders, for VDC copolymers, 25 726... 

Theory Iron (III) upto an extent of 50-200 meg can be extracted effectively from an aqueous solution with a 1% solution of 8-hydroxyquinoline (symbolized as HQ) in chloroform by carrying out a double extraction when the pH of the resulting aqueous solution ranges between 2 and 10. Evidently, between pH 2.0 to 2.5 metals like Ni, Co, Ce (III) and A1 do not interfere at all. However, iron (III) oxinate is dark-coloured in chloroform and absorbs at 470 nm. 

The amount of modifier required to prevent third phase formation can be determined in the following way. The aqueous and solvent phases are first contacted, and once the three phases have separated, the lower aqueous phase is drawn off and discarded. The modifier to be considered is then added from a burette in small increments to the two organic phases, and the mixture shaken after each addition. The amount of modifier required to produce a single organic phase is then used to calculate the amount required to be added to the solvent. Generally, about 2-5 vol% of modifier is needed, but more may be necessary if high concentrations of extractant are used in the solvent. Any effects of modifiers on the kinetics and equilibria of metal extraction and stripping can be determined by shakeout tests. 

One important point regarding microemulsion extraction is that the complexity of the system with its three phases, two interfaces, and usually unknown phase morphology makes the prediction of its performance quite difficult, particularly when dealing with solutes of diverse properties. The literature indicates that it does not always improve metal extraction, and in cases it may even hinder it due to the effect of the emulsifying additives. 

The chemical or physical form of trace metals in water is often of interest. The form in which a specific element is present will often influence is toxic effects. For instance the chemical state of chromium affects its toxicity i.e., Cr+6 is more carcino genic than Cr+3, Kopp (48) has described the various forms in which metals may he present. The categories include dissolved metals, suspended metals, total metals, extractable metals and organometallics. In addition, Kopp describes sample preparation requirements for each category. Gihhs (20) has also studied metal species in river water. It should be obvious that the desired analytical result has to he considered beforehand. For example, if dissolved metal concentrations were desired and normal acid preservation performed, suspended metals could possibly be solubilized to a large extent. Both Hamilton (25) and Robertson (81) have shown vast differences between acidified and non-acidified samples. Many other publications have dealt with this subject (16, 37, 80, 30). 

The separation of hidden gold from every other metal is effected by extraction in aqua regia, for this water attacks to dissolve no other metal than fine gold alone. This is a loose and incorrect statement. 

Quantitative determinations of the thicknesses of a multiple - layered sample (for example, two polymer layers in intimate contact) by ATR spectroscopy has been shown to be possible. The attenuation effect on the evanescent wave by the layer in contact with the IRE surface must be taken into account (112). Extension of this idea of a step-type concentration profile for an adsorbed surfactant layer on an IRE surface was made (113). and equations relating the Gibbs surface excess to the absorbance in the infrared spectrum of a sufficiently thin adsorbed surfactant layer were developed. The addition of a thin layer of a viscous hydrocarbon liquid to the IRE surface was investigated as a model of a liquid-liquid interface (114) for studies of metal extraction ( Ni+2, Cu+2) by a hydrophobic chelating agent. The extraction of the metals from an aqueous buffer into the hydrocarbon layer was monitored kinetically by the appearance of bands unique to the complex formed. 

Honaker and Preiser reported the first fundamental kinetic mechanism of chelate extraction in 1962 [1]. They elucidated that the rate-determining step for the extraction of divalent metal ions with dithizone was the formation of their 1 1 complexes in the aqueous phase. They proposed that a simple batch extraction method could be used as an alternative method of the complicated stopped-flow method, which was the only method available at the time, to measure such a fast reaction rate. Since the 1970s, hydrometallurgy has been developed in many countries, and extensive kinetic studies on the metal extraction have been conducted in an effort to improve the extraction rate as well as to develop effective and reusable extractants. The extractants used in hydrometallurgy are required to be highly hydrophobic and readily coordinative with various metal ions. On the basis of the interfacial adsorptivity of the extractant, Flett et al. [2] expected an interfacial reaction mechanism in the chelate extraction process. There was, however, no experimental evidence to prove the interfacial mechanism directly [3]. 

Table 31.3 gives a few typical examples on recovery of actinides by ELM. Myriad literature reports exist on the use of HDEHP for metal extraction involve ELMs. Comparative studies between column and batch liquid emulsion membrane techniques based on HDEHP/HCl system were carried out to develop a system for the isolation of Th from natural uranium, which showed that, kineticaUy, the equilibrium for thorium separation using batch technique is faster than the continuous column system [37]. The effective separation of Th from natural uranium was found to be independent of time. El-Sherif studied... 

---