Merge in Transit

Transportation costs will usually be lower than drop shipping because any order with products from three manufacturers would require only a single delivery to the customer compared to three, otherwise (Chopra 2003). Performing the in-transit merge requires additional capability of doing so. Customer s transaction cost will be lower because a single delivery is received. The required information infrastructure would be complex, as operations at the retailer, manufacturers, and the carrier must be coordinated. 

---

Merge-in- transit A technique for combining order components from various sources while those components are in transit from sources to customers. 

Merge-in-Transit/Hub consolidation Merge-in-Transit is a practice to combine items from multiple sources into a single customer shipment. This includes items on stock in the distribution center, from which the shipment is sent, items on stock in other distribution centers, items on stock elsewhere (e.g. at a plant or a supplier) as well as make-to-order items. The items to be merged are cross-docked from inbound receipt to outbound shipping. Merging is usually performed in a shipper s distribution center (DC) or in a carrier s terminal 6-Functional supply chain processes (source and deliver) X 0... 

If a logistics company chooses to focus on (say) iron ore, it would have little use for trucks, vans, and aircraft. It would choose a mass transportation mode such as an ocean liner or freight train. In contrast, a company specializing in computers may design logistics to support merge-in-transit, and drop shipping (discussed later). 

As shown in Fig. 6.3, order information flows from the customer to the manufacturer s online store. Inventory is held at the manufacturing plant. The manufacturer ships the products to customers using carriers, as per actual orders. To reduce response time, the manufacturer can contract with carriers with faster modes of transportation. Fulfillment time depends on the distance between the manufacturer s warehouse and the location of the customer. Note that in this model a retailer can also be the immediate customer, and it plays the role of an intermediary. The carrier would now deliver to the retailer, and customers would visit the retail stores to make a purchase. Fulfillment models using a retail store are discussed in Chap. 5. In a variation to this model, Dell uses a merge in transit facility, described later. 

Ala-Risku, T., Karkkainen, M., Hohnstidm, J. (2003). Evaluating the applicability of merge-in-transit. International Journal of Logistics Management, 14, 67—82. 

Companies may also use some of the following approaches (discussed in Chap. 6) use drop-shipping where contract manufacturers directly ship the finished products to customers, and use 3PL services with merge-in-transit capability. The distribution centers may also be owned and operated by 3rd party service providers. Vendor managed inventory (VMI) with its proximity to the customer, would be very effective from distribution centers. To implement merge in transit, the logistics partner would pick up the major components of an order (such as the CPU and monitor) from different contract manufacturers and assembles them while in... 

Therefore an entirely different approach is preferred. The aforementioned TRG I is used to elaborate trees of reactions, pathways from EM(B) and EM(E) until they merge. Since the reaction pathways have an orientation that is enforced by the transition tables, the latter must be reflected about their main diagonals when the trees are originating from the product side. The chemical constitution of the species generated is represented in canonical form. Thus the identity of any two species is immediately noticed. This does not only eliminate redundancies, but, more importantly, indicates any nodes at which the two trees merge. In this context the distinct resonance structures of a molecule and its tautomeric forms can be treated as equivalent. 

Figure 9. Schematic representation of upper portion of potential eneigy surface for merging of substitution mechanisms. A Sjsj 1 mechanism. No nucleophilic solvation in transition state ion pair intermediate (possibly nudeophilically solvated) B Sn2 (intermediate). Transition state is nudeophilically solvated by solvent (SOH) intermediate is a nudeophilically solvated ion pair (see Fig. 8) C Classical Sn2. No energy minimum. In curves A and B, the second transition state may be of higher energy than the first in cases where internal return is important.

One kind of a multicritical point is a point over a critical line where more than two different states coalesce. The common multicritical points in statistical mechanics theory of phase transition are tricritical points (the point that separates a first order and a continuous line) or bicritical points (two continuous lines merge in a first order line) (see, for example, Ref. 166). These multicritical points were observed in quantum few-body systems only in the large dimension limit approximation for small molecules [10,32]. For three-dimensional systems, this kind of multicritical points was not reported yet. 

As we mentioned in Section V, near the temperature of phase transition to the metaphase the solid state of alkyl- and alkoxybenzoic acids is unstable in relation to the formation of hydrogen-bonded open associates. The associates merge in polymer chains, which can include over 10 acid molecules. Let us treat how the statistical model described above can account for such a behavior of the associates. 

---