Mechanical yield strength

Figure 7.6 shows the relationship between the meehanieal threshold and the separation between pinning points for dislocation segments. The mechanical yield strength is controlled by the largest separation, Hence, behind... 

The property that needs improvement is extrinsic and is therefore manufacture-dependent dielectric strength depends largely on microstructure. Flaws such as microcracks lead to local voltage peaks that may trigger dielectric breakdown. Moreover, the insulator in the X-ray tubes operates in a plasma that contains electrons and metal atoms that both interact strongly with the surface of the insulator. The values of the material properties that are listed in tables have not been determined in such an exceptional atmosphere and those values are therefore not very reliable selection criteria. The situation is similar to mechanical yield strength, which also depends on surface flaws. 

Fig. 41. Typical stress—strain curve. Points is the yield point of the material the sample breaks at point B. Mechanical properties are identified as follows a = Aa/Ae, modulus b = tensile strength c = yield strength d = elongation at break. The toughness or work to break is the area under the curve.

Structural Properties at Low Temperatures It is most convenient to classify metals by their lattice symmetiy for low temperature mechanical properties considerations. The face-centered-cubic (fee) metals and their alloys are most often used in the construc tion of cryogenic equipment. Al, Cu Ni, their alloys, and the austenitic stainless steels of the 18-8 type are fee and do not exhibit an impact duc tile-to-brittle transition at low temperatures. As a general nile, the mechanical properties of these metals with the exception of 2024-T4 aluminum, improve as the temperature is reduced. Since annealing of these metals and alloys can affect both the ultimate and yield strengths, care must be exercised under these conditions. 

Figure 11.7 shows how the mechanical properties of normalised carbon steels change with carbon content. Both the yield strength and tensile strength increase linearly with carbon content. This is what we would expect the FejC acts as a strengthening phase, and the proportion of FojC in the steel is linear in carbon concentration (Fig. 11.6a). The ductility, on the other hand, falls rapidly as the carbon content goes up (Fig. 11.7) because the a-FejC interfaces in pearlite are good at nucleating cracks.

Cellular materials can collapse by another mechanism. If the cell-wall material is plastic (as many polymers are) then the foam as a whole shows plastic behaviour. The stress-strain curve still looks like Fig. 25.9, but now the plateau is caused by plastic collapse. Plastic collapse occurs when the moment exerted on the cell walls exceeds its fully plastic moment, creating plastic hinges as shown in Fig. 25.12. Then the collapse stress (7 1 of the foam is related to the yield strength Gy of the wall by... 

In the case of commercial crystalline polymers wider differences are to be noted. Many polyethylenes have a yield strength below 20001bf/in (14 MPa) whilst the nylons may have a value of 12 000 Ibf/in (83 MPa). In these polymers the intermolecular attraction, the molecular weight and the type and amount of crystalline structure all influence the mechanical properties. 

Another manifestation of a time dependence to particle adhesion involves the phenomenon of total engulfment of the particle by the substrate. It is recognized that both the JKR and MP theories of adhesion assume that the contact radius a is small compared to the particle radius R. Realistically, however, that may not be the case. Rather, the contact radius depends on the work of adhesion between the two materials, as well as their mechanical properties such as the Young s modulus E or yield strength Y. Accordingly, there is no fundamental reason why the contact radius cannot be the same size as the particle radius. For the sake of the present discussion, let us ignore some mathematical complexities and simply assume that both the JKR and MP theories can be simply expanded to include large contact radii. Let us further assume that, under conditions of no externally applied load, the contact and particle radii are equal, that is a(0) = R. Under these conditions, Eq. 29 reduces to... 

The yield strengths of defect-free SWNTs may be higher than that measured for Bacon s scroll structures, and measurements on defect-free carbon nanotubes may allow the prediction of the yield strength of a single, defect-free graphene sheet. Also, the yield strengths of MWNTs are subject to the same limitations discussed above with respect to tube slippage. All the discussion here relates to ideal nanotubes real carbon nanotubes may contain faults of various types that will influence their properties and require experimental measurements of their mechanical constants. 

In spite of these representative first-order descriptions, experiments, theory, and material models do not typically agree to second order. Compressibility (derivatives of pressure with volume) shows complex behaviors that do not generally agree with data obtained from other loadings. Mechanical yielding and strength behavior at pressure show complexities that are not... 

The concept of a welt defined elastic range to large strain is not realistic. The concept of well defined stress at which mechanical yielding occurs leading to well defined elastic-inelastic conditions is not realistic. Actually, such conclusions could well be anticipated from strength studies at atmospheric pressure, but there has been little explicit reason to consider the nonideal effects from the mechanical-response shock studies. 

Mechanical Properties. The mechanical properties used for design shall be the minimum values allowed by the applicable material specification or shall be the minimum values determined by the manufacturer in accordance with the test procedures specified in ASTM A370 Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products, or by mill certification for mill products. The yield point shall be used in lieu of yield strength for those materials exhibiting a yield point. Yield strength shall be determined at 0.2% offset. 

The stress corrosion resistance of maraging steel has been evaluated both by the use of smooth specimens loaded to some fraction of the yield strength and taking the time to failure as an indication of resistance, and by the fracture mechanics approach which involves the use of specimens with a pre-existing crack. Using the latter approach it is possible to obtain crack propagation rates at known stress intensity factors (K) and to determine critical stress intensity factors (A iscc) below which a crack will not propagate (see Section 8.9). 

In many cases, a product fails when the material begins to yield plastically. In a few cases, one may tolerate a small dimensional change and permit a static load that exceeds the yield strength. Actual fracture at the ultimate strength of the material would then constitute failure. The criterion for failure may be based on normal or shear stress in either case. Impact, creep and fatigue failures are the most common mode of failures. Other modes of failure include excessive elastic deflection or buckling. The actual failure mechanism may be quite complicated each failure theory is only an attempt to explain the failure mechanism for a given class of materials. In each case a safety factor is employed to eliminate failure. 

Sm is the maximum allowable operating stress, calculated as specified minimum yield strength x Hf, where Hf is the material performance factor from Mandatory Appendix IX, Table IX-5A or IX-5B. Material performance factors account for the adverse effects of hydrogen gas on the mechanical properties of carbon steels used in the construction of pipelines. 

---