Maximum likelihood expectation

Parameter Estimation. WeibuU parameters can be estimated using the usual statistical procedures however, a computer is needed to solve readily the equations. A computer program based on the maximum likelihood method is presented in Reference 22. Graphical estimation can be made on WeibuU paper without the aid of a computer however, the results caimot be expected to be as accurate and consistent. 

The parameter values found by the two methods differ slightly owing to the different criteria used which were the least squares method for ESL and the maximum-likelihood method for SIMUSOLV and because the T=10 data point was included with the ESL run. The output curve is very similar and the parameters agree within the expected standard deviation. The quality of parameter estimation can also be judged from a contour plot as given in Fig. 2.41. 

Since the final form of a maximum likelihood estimator depends on the assumed error distribution, we partially answered the question why there are different criteria in use, but we have to go further. Maximum likelihood estimates are only guaranteed to have their expected properties if the error distribution behind the sample is the one assumed in the derivation of the method, but in many cases are relatively insensitive to deviations. Since the error distribution is known only in rare circumstances, this property of robustness is very desirable. The least squares method is relatively robust, and hence its use is not restricted to normally distributed errors. Thus, we can drop condition (vi) when talking about the least squares method, though then it is no more associated with the maximum likelihood principle. There exist, however, more robust criteria that are superior for errors with distributions significantly deviating from the normal one, as we will discuss... 

Assume the distribution of x is fix) = 1/0. 0 random sampling from this distribution, prove that the sample maximum is a consistent estimator of 0. Note you can prove that the maximum is the maximum likelihood estimator of 0. But, the usual properties do not apply here. Why not (Hint Attempt to verify that the expected first derivative of the log-likelihood with respect to 0 is zero.)... 

If we had estimates in hand, the simplest way to estimate the expected values of the Hessian would be to evaluate the expressions above at the maximum likelihood estimates, then compute the negative inverse. First, since the expected value of <51nL/3a is zero, it follows that E[x/5] = 1/a. Now,... 

The Maximum Likelihood Criterion. Let it be assumed that for m different values of an independent variable x(x , i= 1,..., m) there are corresponding measured values of a dependent variable 7(7, i=. ., ni). Let us further assume that there is a theoretical model predicting the way in which jis expected to depend on vand that this model may be represented by an analytical function f ... 

This program will give variance estimates for each of the precision components along with two-sided 95% confidence intervals for the population variance component for each expected mass. SAS PROC MIXED will provide ANOVA estimates, maximum likelihood estimates, and REML estimates the default estimation, used here, is REML. 

The training problem determines the set of model parameters given above for an observed set of wavelet coefficients. In other words, one first obtains the wavelet coefficients for the time series data that we are interested in and then, the model parameters that best explain the observed data are found by using the maximum likelihood principle. The expectation maximization (EM) approach that jointly estimates the model parameters and the hidden state probabilities is used. This is essentially an upward and downward EM method, which is extended from the Baum-Welch method developed for the chain structure HMM [43, 286]. 

A multiscale Bayesian approach for data rectification of Gaussian errors with linear steady-state models was also presented in this chapter. This approach provides better rectification than maximum likelihood rectification and single-scale Bayesian rectification for measured data where the underlying signals or errors are multiscale in nature. Since data from most chemical and manufacturing processes are usually multiscale in nature due to the presence of deterministic and stochastic features that change over time and/or frequency, the multiscale Bayesian approach is expected to be beneficial for rectification of most practical data. 

Population pharmacokinetics offered as a feature of a broader PK/PD application within an Enterprise (end-to-end, LIMS to report) solution population approach uses a parametric expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm to compute maximum likelihood estimates... 

Maximum-likelihood haplotype frequencies are estimated from the observed data using an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm and standardized linkage disequilibrium values (D = D/D ax). and D values are shown as graphic maps (http // www.weU.ox.ac.uk/asthma/GOLD/docs/ldmax.html) and HAPLOVIEW program. 

When the available number of data points is small, the method of maximum likelihood has significantly smaller variance than the methods just suggested. It is a powerful statistical tool and was first used in the analysis of resonance widths by Porter and Thomas 42). The technique is outlined here because it can be expected that additional experimental data will continue to become available over the next few years, and the fast reactor analyst will wish to re-evaluate the parameters of the Doppler effect continually. 

Weighted average. It is a common situation that the value of a physical quantity is determined from different types of experiments, and the experimental values Xf) obtained for those quantities have their own (different) accuracies characterized by the standard deviation (tk)- When the error distribution of each experimental value can be considered normal, then the maximum likelihood estimate of the expected value of the physical quantity is given by the following weighted average (Orear 1987) ... 

Continuing from the previous remark, the following conclusion can be drawn According to remark ( 53), the sum of squares taken at the parameter values Oi, fl2>- would have a distribution because in this case the exact expected values (/i,) would show up in the sum. It is important to stress this, because it will be shown in the section on the evaluation of nuclear spectra that the values ai,a2,...,a are the maximum likelihood estimates of the exact values Ui, ti2.. > Therefore, one might expect that the relation of a to the concrete measured spectrum is the same as that of the parameter vector a that it estimates. Well, the decrease of the degree of freedom indicates that this assumption is false. The reason is that minimization tends to divert the estimated values from the exact parameter values so that they can attribute the largest possible likelihood to the concrete spectrum. And this will be so even if the concrete spectrum has a rather low likelihood when calculated with the exact values of the parameters. 

---