Material dispersion comparisons

Figure 2. Comparison of the material dispersion among PMMA, PHFIP 2-FA, and silica. (A) PMMA (B) Silica (C) PHFIP 2-FA.

Figure A.16 shows a comparison of the material dispersions among PMMA, CYTOP, and silica glass. The material dispersion of CYTOP is even lower than that of silica glass. The theoretical dependence of the bandwidth of the CYTOP-based Gl POF and a multimode GOF on wavelength is shown in Figure A.17. CYTOP-based Gl POFs are predicted to have a higher bandwidth than multimode GOFs...

Figure A.16 Comparison of the material dispersion of fiber materials for pure CYTOP, PMMA, and silica. (Adapted with permission from Ref [55], 2006 IEEE.)...

Toxic chemical munitions have unique characteristics in comparison to other weapons systems, reaching personnel both widely dispersed and concentrated in fortifications, ie, gases and aerosols are not bound by corners. These materials can penetrate crevices reaching personnel physically protected from high explosives. In addition, toxic chemicals are minimum-destmction weapons as regards matHriel (5). 

Comparison of Table 5.4 and 5.7 allows the prediction that aromatic oils will be plasticisers for natural rubber, that dibutyl phthalate will plasticise poly(methyl methacrylate), that tritolyl phosphate will plasticise nitrile rubbers, that dibenzyl ether will plasticise poly(vinylidene chloride) and that dimethyl phthalate will plasticise cellulose diacetate. These predictions are found to be correct. What is not predictable is that camphor should be an effective plasticiser for cellulose nitrate. It would seem that this crystalline material, which has to be dispersed into the polymer with the aid of liquids such as ethyl alcohol, is only compatible with the polymer because of some specific interaction between the carbonyl group present in the camphor with some group in the cellulose nitrate. 

It has been shown that the polarizability of a substance containing no dipoles will indicate the strength o/any dispersive interactions that might take place with another molecule. In comparison, due to self-association or internal compensation that can take place with polar materials, the dipole moment determined from bulk dielectric constant measurements will often not give a true indication of the strength of any polar interaction that might take place with another molecule. An impression of a dipole-dipole interaction is depicted in Figure 11. 

Table 5 compares the tensile properties of Vectra A950 in the form of dispersed fibers and droplets in the matrix by injection molding, microfibril by extrusion and drawing [28], injection molded pure thick sample and pure thin sample, and the pure drawn strand [28]. As exhibited, our calculated fiber modulus with its average of 24 GPa is much higher than that of the thick and thin pure TLCP samples injection molded. It can be explained that in cases of pure TLCP samples the material may only be fibrillated in a very thin skin layer owing to the excellent flow behavior in comparison with that in the blends. However, this modulus value is lower than that of the extruded and drawn pure strand. This can be... 

There have been remarkably few reviews of the chemistry of decompositions and interactions of solids. The present account is specifically concerned with the kinetic characteristics described in the literature for the reactions of many and diverse compounds. Coverage necessarily includes references to a variety of relevant and closely related topics, such as the background theory of the subject, proposed mechanistic interpretations of observations, experimental methods with their shortcomings and errors, etc. In a survey of acceptable length, however, it is clearly impossible to explore in depth all features of all reports concerned with the reactivity and reactions of all solids. We believe that there is a need for separate and more detailed reviews of topics referred to here briefly. The value of individual publications in the field, which continue to appear in a not inconsiderable flow, would undoubtedly be enhanced by their discussion in the widest context. Systematic presentation and constructive comparisons of observations and reports, which are at present widely dispersed, would be expected to produce significant correlations and conclusions. Useful advances in the subject are just as likely to emerge in the form of generalizations discerned in the wealth of published material as from further individual studies of specific systems. Perhaps potential reviewers have been deterred by the combination of the formidable volume and the extensive dispersal of the information now available. 

Worker safety studies are not likely to normally include a control substance (i.e., a material used in the study to serve as basis of comparison with the test substance). However, if a control substance is included as a treatment group, then it must (1) be fully characterized as to its identity, purity (or strength), and stability (and solubility, if appropriate) (2) be appropriately tested in mixtures with any carrier used and (3) meet all the other GLP recordkeeping, labeling, and storage requirements, as specified for the test substance. There is some regulatory relief here, however, in that water, by definition, is excluded from being considered a control substance, and vehicles (those substances added to enhance solubilization or dispersion of the test substance) are addressed separately in the FIFRA GLP Standards. 

---