Mass flow drawbacks

Some early calorimeters use thermal methods based on principles of heat and mass balance (12) and temperature rise of a constant flow of air through the combustion chamber (13). These calorimeters suffer from many drawbacks associated with their design. Heat and mass balance requires numerous measurements to account for all heat and mass flows. In most cases, thermal lag and losses in the equipment occur, which are not easily calculated. 

There are two ways to obtain stjo and st. In the first way, CH4 is measured in the bypass mode before or during the reaction and a comparison with the amount of CH4 after the gas passed the reactor is done. However, this procedure has drawbacks the gas flow through the reactor is never absolutely stable due to uncertainties of the mass flow controllers additionally, during such measurements one cannot measure the outlet gas of the reactor. Therefore, the obtained values have large errors, due to summation, especially at low conversions. In the second way, the sum of the remaining amount of CH4 and all the products is used to obtain si o, and the sum of the reaction products is used to obtain si o - Si. Therefore, the calculation can result in much lower uncertainties. For the detection of the hydrocarbon species, a flame ionization detector (FID), and for CO and CO2 a thermal conductivity detector (TCD), was used. When COT falls below the detection limit of the TCD, it drops... 

One of the drawbacks of using modifiers is their response in some of the detectors. The flame ionization detector (FID) is very popular with capillary and micropacked columns in SFC because of its near-universal response and high sensitivity and the lack of response of CO2 as the most popular mobile phase. The low mass flow rate of the mobile phase in small columns allows for a direct interfacing of the column to the FID and other detectors without flow splitting or back-pressure regulation. 

The homogeneous model shows a tendency to calculate small discharge mass flow rates, especially if short pipes are treated [9]. The factor N corrects this drawback, where... 

As discussed in Section 4.4.8 and Appendix 4.1, the El source is an archetypal example of a mass flow dependent detector for chromatography, as a result of the high level of pumping applied to the source that removes the analyte almost as soon as it enters. Further, the characteristics that led to the high level of spectral reproducibility, mentioned above, also lead to excellent quantitative precision with a wide linear dynamic range and low detection and quantitation limits. The main drawback of the El source is its limitation to thermally stable and volatile analytes also, in a significant number of... 

One possibility to decrease the temperature gradients and the maximum local temperamre is to increase and control the cooling air mass flow. As a drawback of this procedure the power consumption of the coolant blowers increases dramatically. For current densities of more than 800 mA cm the blower consumed more than 14 % of the stack power [10],... 

The benefits and drawbacks of mass flow are summarised in Table 5.1. 

A further drawback of this construction is that it is not convenient to have a taper outlet slot on a container so the practice is to slope the feeder casing from the screw diameter to a parallel hopper outlet size that matches the largest diameter of the screw. All most invariably, this results in a casing wall inclination at the smaller end of the feeder that is inadequate for product slip. In combination with the gap at the side of the screw to the casing wall that fills with static product and opposes wall, the effect is to create a narrow flow channel with non-mass flow characteristics. The economics of manufacture also detract from widespread adoption of this technique as both the screw and the casing have taper components that demand extra fabrication time. 

Strehlow (1975) achieved a solution by conducting a mass balance over the flow field. Such a balance can be drawn up under the assumptions of similarity and a constant density between shock and flame. The assumption of constant density violates the momentum-conservation equation, and is a drastic simplification. The maximum overpressure is, therefore, substantially underestimated over the entire flame speed range. An additional drawback is that the relationship of overpressure to flame speed is not produced in the form of a tractable analytical expression, but must be found by trial and error. 

As discussed in the previous section and summarized in Table II, a drawback of the MCFT method is that the mass accumulation in the fines removal system cannot be simulated, therefore we examined whether this mass accumulation has a notlcable effect on the process dynamics. In the simulation the fines removal is simulated with a cut sizes of 150 ]m. The fines flow rate and the recycle flow rate Q were 1.25 and. 75 liter per second. The results are sho%m in Flgi e 7 It is clear that the mass accumulation has Indeed an effect on the process dynamics. Even on the mean size of the crystals a clear shift in the response is seen. It appears that the effect is strongly dependent on the value of the recycle flow rate (not shown). The conclusion from these results is that the effects of mass accumulation in the fines system are present, and can only be neglected at low cutsizes and low fines recycle rates. 

While single-column methods work quite well, these methods have two main drawbacks. First, when coupling turbulent-flow directly to a mass spectrometer, the mobile-phase effluent (4 or 5 mL/min) has to be split to make the effluent flow compatible for mass spectrometers (< 1 mL/min). Although narrow-bore TFLC columns (0.5 mm i.d.) can be operated at 1-1.5 mL/min, only some mass spectrometers are capable of operating at these flow rates. The splitting will result in lower detection limits. The lower sensitivity is not due to the detection limit of the mass spectrometer, which acts as a concentration detector, but to the fact that the analyte is more diluted when contained in the higher TFLC flows. There is also more mobile-phase waste to dispose. Of course, this may not be a major drawback, if one were to collect fractions... 

By and large, ejectors and motionless mixers have similar mass transfer performance at a given gas-to-liquid flow ratio and energy input. However, ejectors have a number of benefits and drawbacks compared to a motionless mixer. On the positive side, the ejector suction means that a pressurized gas supply is not required. The unrestricted mixing tube means that solid formation due to reaction is not problematic. Against this, the operation is sensitive to changes in the gas-liquid flow ratio and diameter/length ratio. Gas-to-liquid flow ratios are also more limited in ejectors. 

---