Lower-upper factorization

Holland (8) recommends LU (lower-upper) factorization for calculating the A vector. Older methods such as a Gauss-Jordan elimination should be avoided because they build excessive computer error. In LU factorization, the Jacobian is rearranged into two matrices ... 

Assume we have the production in a chemical reactor whereby the product yield y is essentially affected by three factors X, reaction mixture temperature, X2 pressure in reactor and X3 time of reaction. If all factors are changed at two levels (p=2) then the research program is encompassed by four trials (N=4). The lower level factor values are marked by the symbol and the upper ones by + . The conditions of doing each run are shown in Table 2.1. 

The PMS can be used to schedule the starting up and shutting down of the main generators. A simple method can be used as follows. Set the upper load factor of each generator to be say 75% and the lower load factor to be say 60%. As the plant load increases from zero one generator would be used... 

Figure 16.3 shows the scheduling profile as the load increases from zero to full plant load, and decreases back to zero. The lines shown are based on a 75% upper load factor and a 60% lower load factor. 

Variations in lattice vibrations in fine particles with respect to the bulk may arise from (i) the reduced volume leading to lattice softening with resultant decrease of the Debye temperature, (ii) surface effects since the surface atoms are probably more weakly bound than the atoms in the interior, or (iii) changes in the lower and upper cut-off frequencies of the phonon spectrum. The first two phenomena should decrease / while the latter could increase /. In general, one observes a recoil-free fraction in fine particle systems that is much smaller than that of bulk materials. However, most often this is not due to effects of the lattice vibrations but to the motion of the particle as a whole, which indeed drastically lowers the / factor. 

The upper sign is for anti-Stokes scattering, the lower for Stokes scattering. The factor in the parentheses is... 

They must be coupled by separate radial factors in a full calculation [2] but, to the extent that non-adiabatic coupling between the upper and lower... 

This technique (also known as the Grout reduction or Cholesky factorization) is based on the transfonnation of the matrix of coefficients in a system of algebraic equations into the product of lower and upper triangular matrices as... 

In addition to the mixed results in Table 10-1, the G2 calculation for H2 produces an energy that is lower than the experimental value, in contradiction to the rule that variational procedures reach a least upper bound on the energy. Some new factors are at work, and we must look into the stmcture of the G2 procedure in temis of high-level Gaussian basis sets and electron correlation. 

The experimental design for ruggedness testing is balanced in that each factor level is paired an equal number of times with the upper case and lower case levels... 

LV Factorization of a Matrix To eveiy m X n matrix A there exists a permutation matrix P, a lower triangular matrix L with unit diagonal elements, and a.nm X n (upper triangular) echelon matrix U such that PA = LU. The Gauss elimination is in essence an algorithm to determine U, P, and L. The permutation matrix P may be needed since it may be necessaiy in carrying out the Gauss elimination to... 

We have considered ihe niaxinuini overcunenl facior I or illustration. It corresponds to the nia.ximuni permissible upper variation in the capacitance value of a capacitor or a bank. One can. however, consider a lower factor depending upon the maximum permissible upper variation for a particular type (voltage and VAr rating) of capacitor unit or hank. A factor of. ]f> is, however, recommended lor capacitor duties. See also Section 2.5.6. 

A molecular dynamics force field is a convenient compilation of these data (see Chapter 2). The data may be used in a much simplified fonn (e.g., in the case of metric matrix distance geometry, all data are converted into lower and upper bounds on interatomic distances, which all have the same weight). Similar to the use of energy parameters in X-ray crystallography, the parameters need not reflect the dynamic behavior of the molecule. The force constants are chosen to avoid distortions of the molecule when experimental restraints are applied. Thus, the force constants on bond angle and planarity are a factor of 10-100 higher than in standard molecular dynamics force fields. Likewise, a detailed description of electrostatic and van der Waals interactions is not necessary and may not even be beneficial in calculating NMR strucmres. 

---