Elimination Gauss

Numerical methods in linear algebra Gauss elimination [6] 

In this method unknowns are eliminated by combining equations such that the n equations and n unknowns are reduced to an equivalent upper triangular system, which is then solved by back substitution. Let us consider the following system  

For the first stage of elimination, multiply the first row of Equation 1.112 by 2i /a j j and Ajj /a j j, respectively, and subtract from the second and third rows. 

The first equation from each stage results in 

The elimination procedure described in the last sections forms a process, commonly called Gauss elimination. It is the backbone of the direct methods, and is the most useful in solving linear equations. Scaling and pivoting are essential in the Gauss elimination process. 

Step 3 Search for the largest element in magnitude in the first column and pivot that coefficient into the position. 

Step 4 Apply the elimination procedure to rows 2 to N to create zeros in the first column below the pivot element. The modified elements in row 2 to row N and column 2 to colunm iV + 1 of the augmented matrix must be computed and inserted in place of the original elements using the following formula  

Step 5 Repeat steps 3 and 4 for rows 3 to N. After this is completely done, the resulting augmented matrbc will be an upper triangular matrix. 

Step 6 Solve for x using back substitution with the following equations  

---

LV Factorization of a Matrix To eveiy m X n matrix A there exists a permutation matrix P, a lower triangular matrix L with unit diagonal elements, and a.nm X n (upper triangular) echelon matrix U such that PA = LU. The Gauss elimination is in essence an algorithm to determine U, P, and L. The permutation matrix P may be needed since it may be necessaiy in carrying out the Gauss elimination to... 

Pivoting in Gauss Elimination It might seem that the Gauss elimination completely disposes of the problem of finding solutions of linear systems, and theoretically it does. In practice, however, things are not so simple. 

The fact that = 1 indicates that our solution is not very good. Indeed the exact solution of the system is Xi = 1.00010 and I2 = 0.99990, so the result computed by Gauss elimination is pretty bad. 

In principle, the task of solving a linear algebraic systems seems trivial, as with Gauss elimination a solution method exists which allows one to solve a problem of dimension N (i.e. N equations with N unknowns) at a cost of O(N ) elementary operations [85]. Such solution methods which, apart from roundoff errors and machine accuracy, produce an exact solution of an equation system after a predetermined number of operations, are called direct solvers. However, for problems related to the solution of partial differential equations, direct solvers are usually very inefficient Methods such as Gauss elimination do not exploit a special feature of the coefficient matrices of the corresponding linear systems, namely that most of the entries are zero. Such sparse matrices are characteristic of problems originating from the discretization of partial or ordinary differential equations. As an example, consider the discretization of the one-dimensional Poisson equation... 

The system thus obtained involves N — n + 1 variables, including t//, related by the same number of equations. Since N — n of these are nonlinear equations because of the aq term, an iteration procedure is needed. One starts from a set of q values obtained for a = 0. The equations then become linear and the Gauss elimination method may thus be used to obtain these starting q values. In a second round, these values are used in the aq term and a new set of q values are obtained by... 

Many methods exist for solving the basic form AU = b for the potential U = A-1 b. The methods depend on various features exhibited by the matrices themselves, immediate byproducts of how the problem was set up in the previous stage of specification. A general method, assuming that A is nonsingular (determinant is nonzero), is to find the inverse matrix A-1, using techniques such as Gauss elimination. However, in practice this approach is not computationally viable. Typically, one looks for features of the problem that simplify A. 

Append this solution vector to the set of equations and remove elements to the right of the new pivot element by Gauss elimination. 

Gauss elimination subroutine with pivoting. Then the electron balance equations (40) were solved to obtain new values for... 

Example Assume three-decimal floating arithmetic (i.e., only the three most significant digits of any number are retained), and solve the following system by Gauss elimination ... 

Depending on the space discretisation techniques used, the set of equations to be solved may be different, but for FD- and FV- based methods, the discretisation results in a set of linear or non-linear algebraic equations. These depend on the nature of these partial differential equations and how they are derived. For linear equations, it is well known that a Gauss elimination method can be used as a basic method to solve them. Further details of the Gauss method can be found in [60],... 

This is a system of equations of the form Ax = B. There are several numeral algorithms to solve this equation including Gauss elimination, Gauss-Jacobi method, Cholesky method, and the LU decomposition method, which are direct methods to solve equations of this type. For a general matrix A, with no special properties such as symmetric, band diagonal, and the like, the LU decomposition is a well-established and frequently used algorithm. 

Gauss elimination The most fundamental solution algorithm. Solution of one set of linear equations at a time. 

LU decomposition Efficient if one set of linear equations is repeatedly solved with different inhomogeneous terms (e.g., in the inverse power method.) Less efficient and more cumbersome than Gauss elimination if used only once. 

This procedure completes the Gauss elimination. We can carry out the elimination process by writing only the coefficients and the matrix vector in an array as... 

We can summarize the operations of Gauss elimination in a form suitable for a computer program as follows ... 

A/j for the components (C//4, H O, H2, CO, CO2) at the collocation points (B.41-B.45) are found by a subroutine called FLUX. The subroutine FLUX evaluates ch4 Xcm the collocation points by solving the set of 2N linear algebraic equations (B.41-B.42) — excluding the centre of the pellet where the fluxes are known — by Gauss elimination with partial pivoting using the subroutine called GAUSL (Villadsen and Michelsen, 1978). The rest of the fluxes of the components are found from the stoichiometric equations (5.215). The roots (Uj) of the Jacobi polynomial (w) and the discretization... 

Explicit solutions cease to be computationally efficient as the number of components in the distillation process rises in fact the situation is already maiginal when n =3. But it is possible to use a direct method such as Gauss elimination or an indirect, iterative method, each of which will generate a rapid solution. The fact that the equations are linear means that there will never be a problem with convergence, as is possible with nonlinear equations. 

There is a similar procedure known as Gauss elimination, in which row operations are carried out until the left part of the augmented matrix is in upper triangular form. The bottom row of the augmented matrix then provides the root for one variable. This is substituted into the equation represented by the next-to-bottom row, and it is solved to give the root for the second variable. The two values are substituted into the next equation, and so on. 

---