Lower order models

The idealized flow models and axial dispersion model are used extensively to predict the performance of three-phase slurry reactors. For example, mixed flow model and axial dispersion models are used to predict the reactant conversion and product distribution for conversion of synthesis gas to liquid fuels using FT synthesis [52-57], methanol synthesis 

It is necessary to obtain realistic and reliable estimates of the various transport and hydrodynamic parameters used in the models described in Sections 6.2 and 6.3, as well as the kinetic parameters (estimated preferably in a transport-free environment). A full treatment of the latter is beyond the scope of this chapter, and the interested reader is referred to the extensive expositions in Ramachandran and Chaudhari [46] and Dorais-wamy and Sharma [49]. The estimation of relevant transport and hydrodynamic parameters is discussed in the following section. 

---

Determining the significance of the variables would begin with comparing the higher-order to the lower-order model, sequentially ... 

Fig. 2. Wave number dependence of the empirical function x(k

While the lower order models described in Section 6.3 are useful for the quick prediction of the overall performance of a reactor, these models often rely on simplified flow approximations and often fail to account for change in the local fluid dynamics or transport processes during the presence of internal hardware or changes in flow regimes. Moreover, these models are also based on empirical knowledge (as discussed in Section 6.4) of several parameters such as interfacial area, dispersion coefficients, and mass transfer coefficients. Some of these limitations may be avoided by using CFD models for simulations of gas-liquid-solid flows in three-phase slurry and fluidized bed. 

As implied in the figure, the outputs of the more detailed fundamental models can be used in lower-order models. This flow of information is, in fact, a critical application for high fidelity models. Recently, much work has been done in the development of algorithms to integrate or embed high-fidelity models into system analysis simulation tools. 

In this section, we present a general approach for approximating higher-order transfer function models with lower-order models that have similar dynamic and steady-state characteristics. The low-order models are more convenient for control system design and analysis, as discussed in Chapter 12. 

In Chapter 5, we will review models referred to as moment methods, which attempt to close the chemical source term by expressing the unclosed higher-order moments in terms of lower-order moments. However, in general, such models are of limited applicability. On the other hand, transported PDF methods (discussed in Chapter 6) treat the chemical source term exactly. 

Figure 5.1. Closures for the chemical source term can be understood in terms of their relationship to the joint composition PDF. The simplest methods attempt to represent the joint PDF by its (lower-order) moments. At the next level, the joint PDF is expressed in terms of the product of the conditional joint PDF and the mixture-fraction PDF. The conditional joint PDF can then be approximated by invoking the fast-chemistry or flamelet limits, by modeling the conditional means of the compositions, or by assuming a functional form for the PDF. Similarly, it is also possible to assume a functional form for the joint composition PDF. The best method to employ depends strongly on the functional form of the chemical source term and its characteristic time scales.

The multi-variate DQMOM method, (B.43), ensures that the mixed moments used to determine the unknowns (an,b n,. .., b Ngn) are exactly reproduced for the IEM model in the absence of chemical reactions.11 As discussed earlier, for the homogeneous case (capn = 0) the solution to (B.43) is trivial (an = 0, b yn = 0) and exactly reproduces the IEM model for moments of arbitrary order. On the other hand, for inhomogeneous cases the IEM model will not be exactly reproduced. Thus, since many multi-variate PDFs exist for a given set of lower-order mixed moments, we cannot be assured that every choice of mixed moments used to solve (B.43) will lead to satisfactory results. 

However, there are two practical problems with this ideal choice of the feedback controller C, y. First, it assumes that the model is perfect More importantly it assumes that the inverse of the plant model Cmo) physically realizable. This is almost never true since most plants have deadtime and/or numerator polynomials that are of lower order than denominator polynomials. 

The diagram can be developed from the top downward and can model a system, subsystem, or any individual component. For each level, a set of necessary and sufficient lower-order conditions or events is identified. 

The above is not intended to be a definitive list but rather to indicate some of the more commonly used models at the present time. Other, more historical, models have been used extensively, for example the polymerisation models of Toop and Samis (1962) and Masson (1965), the models of Flood (1954), Richardson (1956) and Yokakawa and Niwa (1969). More recently the central atom model by Satsri and Lahiri (1985, 1986) and the complex model of Hoch and Arpshofen (1984) have been proposed. Each has been used with some success in lower-order systems, but the extension to multicomponent systems is not always straightforward. 

In each case, the mean-field model forms only a starting point from which one attempts to build a fully correct theory by effecting systematic corrections (e.g., using perturbation theory) to the mean-field model. The ultimate value of any particular mean-field model is related to its accuracy in describing experimental phenomena. If predictions of the mean-field model are far from the experimental observations, then higher-order corrections (which are usually difficult to implement) must be employed to improve its predictions. In such a case, one is motivated to search for a better model to use as a starting point so that lower-order perturbative (or other) corrections can be used to achieve chemical accuracy (e.g., 1 kcal/mole). 

Strong support should be given to innovative ideas for modeling and tests on lower-order surrogate species that help to reduce the cost of tests for potential adverse environmental health effects on humans or shorten the response time needed to obtain that information. 

The bridging procedure finds reduced-order parameters for upper level scale models. As shown in Figure 15, ROMs are introduced to capture the predictive behavior of the lower scale model and provide the links to capturing behavioral information from all of the lower scales, while... 

Approximations for the covalent-space model retain only lower-order permutations, from Eq. (3). Most simply (and most commonly) just the terms involving a transposition P=(ab) exchanging the ath bth (site) indices are retained, whence the exchange parameter can [109] be nicely approximated to be of the form... 

---