Linear potential response

The scan rate, u = EIAt, plays a very important role in sweep voltannnetry as it defines the time scale of the experiment and is typically in the range 5 mV s to 100 V s for nonnal macroelectrodes, although sweep rates of 10 V s are possible with microelectrodes (see later). The short time scales in which the experiments are carried out are the cause for the prevalence of non-steady-state diflfiision and the peak-shaped response. Wlien the scan rate is slow enough to maintain steady-state diflfiision, the concentration profiles with time are linear within the Nemst diflfiision layer which is fixed by natural convection, and the current-potential response reaches a plateau steady-state current. On reducing the time scale, the diflfiision layer caimot relax to its equilibrium state, the diffusion layer is thiimer and hence the currents in the non-steady-state will be higher. 

One uses a simple CG model of the linear responses (n= 1) of a molecule in a uniform electric field E in order to illustrate the physical meaning of the screened electric field and of the bare and screened polarizabilities. The screened nonlocal CG polarizability is analogous to the exact screened Kohn-Sham response function x (Equation 24.74). Similarly, the bare CG polarizability can be deduced from the nonlocal polarizability kernel xi (Equation 24.4). In DFT, xi and Xs are related to each other through another potential response function (PRF) (Equation 24.36). The latter is represented by a dielectric matrix in the CG model. 

Figure 6.23. Linear potential sweep voltammetry (a) input function (b) response function.

The rotating disc electrode is constructed from a solid material, usually glassy carbon, platinum or gold. It is rotated at constant speed to maintain the hydrodynamic characteristics of the electrode-solution interface. The counter electrode and reference electrode are both stationary. A slow linear potential sweep is applied and the current response registered. Both oxidation and reduction processes can be examined. The curve of current response versus electrode potential is equivalent to a polarographic wave. The plateau current is proportional to substrate concentration and also depends on the rotation speed, which governs the substrate mass transport coefficient. The current-voltage response for a reversible process follows Equation 1.17. For an irreversible process this follows Equation 1.18 where the mass transfer coefficient is proportional to the square root of the disc rotation speed. 

Another evolution from the linear sweep mode is cyclic voltammetry, namely, a sequential combination of two (or more) linear sweep potential scans in the opposite direction for this reason, the current versus potential response supplies information about the reversibility of redox systems. 

Linear and cyclic sweep stationary electrode voltammetry (SEV) play preeminent diagnostic roles in molten salt electrochemistry as they do in conventional solvents. An introduction to the theory and the myriad applications of these techniques is given in Chapter 3 of this volume. Examples of the linear and cyclic sweep SEV current-potential responses expected for a reversible, uncomplicated electrode reaction are shown in Figures 3.19 and 3.22, respectively. The important equation of SEV, which relates the peak current, ip, to the potential sweep rate, v, is the Randles-Sevcik equation [67]. For a reversible system at some temperature, T, this equation is... 

Inside a rectangular well a dipole rotates freely until it suffers instantaneous collision with a wall of the well and then is reflected, while in the field models a continuously acting static force tends to decrease the deflection of a dipole from the symmetry axis of the potential. Therefore, if a dipole has a sufficiently low energy, it would start backward motion at such a point inside the well, where its kinetic energy vanishes. Irrespective of the nature of forces governing the motion of a dipole in a liquid, we may formally regard the parabolic, cosine, or cosine squared potential wells as the simplest potential profiles useful for our studies. The linear dielectric response was found for this model, for example, in VIG (p. 359) and GT (p. 249). 

This section presents a fundamental development of Sections V and VI. Here a linear dielectric response of liquid H20 is investigated in terms of two processes characterized by two correlation times. One process involves reorientation of a single polar molecule, and the second one involves a cooperative process, namely, damped vibrations of H-bonded molecules. For the studies of the reorientation process the hat-curved model is employed, which was considered in detail in Section V. In this model a hat-like intermolecular potential comprises a flat bottom and parabolic walls followed by a constant potential. For the studies of vibration process two variants are employed. 

In this section, a brief discussion will be presented about the solution for the current-potential response of different charge transfer processes taking place at a planar electrode when a cyclic linear sweep potential is applied. This procedure has been discussed in detail in references [1-3] and only a short deduction will be provided here. The potential waveform can be written as... 

Stochastic Responses. A basic principle of health protection for both radionuclides and hazardous chemicals is that the probability of a stochastic response, primarily cancers, should be limited to acceptable levels. For any substance that causes stochastic responses, a linear dose-response relationship, without threshold, generally is assumed for purposes of health protection. However, the probability coefficients for radionuclides and chemicals that induce stochastic responses that are generally assumed for purposes of health protection differ in two potentially important ways. 

High-speed linear-sweep voltammetry (LSV) or linear potential sweep chronoamperometry (top) potential waveform (bottom) current response. The areas between the solid lines and the dotted lines measure approximately the charge transferred in the oxidation or reduction. 

EIS has proven to be a useful technique for the analysis of electrochemical systems, such as corrosion systems and batteries. In comparison with DC electrochemical techniques, EIS has tremendous advantages, as it can provide a wealth of information about the system being studied. Also, due to the small perturbation in the AC signal, the electrode response is in a linear potential region, causing no destructive damage to the electrode. Therefore, EIS can be used to evaluate the time relation of interface parameters. 

Time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) as a complete formalism [7] is a more recent development, although the historical roots date back to the time-dependent Thomas-Fermi model proposed by Bloch [8] as early as 1933. The first and rather successful steps towards a time-dependent Kohn-Sham (TDKS) scheme were taken by Peuckert [9] and by Zangwill and Soven [10]. These authors treated the linear density response of rare-gas atoms to a time-dependent external potential as the response of non-interacting electrons to an effective time-dependent potential. In analogy to stationary KS theory, this effective potential was assumed to contain an exchange-correlation (xc) part, r,c(r, t), in addition to the time-dependent external and Hartree terms ... 

Here Xa(r, r, m) and Xt(r, f, are the exact density-density response functions (157) of each separate system in the absence of the other. Xa is defined by the linear density response nia(r) exp(wt) of the electrons in system a to an externally applied electron potential energy perturbation Ff (r)e ... 

In the fixed interference method, the potential response is measured using solutions containing a constant activity of interfering ion J in the mixture of ions I and J. This is symbolised as oj (IJ), the constant interferent ion activity in the mixture of I and J and a (IJ) the varying activities of the primary ion in the mixture of I and J. The potential values obtained are plotted against the activity of the primary ion. The intersection obtained from the extrapolation of the linear portions of this curve will indicate the value of ui (IJ) that is to be used to calculate from the following ... 

The oxygen-containing surface groups are responsible for the potential response of carbon electrodes to hydrogen ion concentration in. solution. Potential measurements of carbon materials in buffer solutions show that the relationship E = /(pH) is linear in the pH range 2.0-7.0 and can be de.scribed by a linear equation with a slope between 20 and 60 mV/pH. depending on the nature of the electrode material [160,161]. 

---